Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
There are several factors that can influence which committee a member of Congress joins, including:
The member's personal interests and expertise: Members of Congress may join committees that align with their personal interests or areas of expertise, allowing them to have a greater impact on issues that they care about.
The member's constituency: Members of Congress may also join committees that are particularly relevant to the needs and interests of their constituents. For example, a member representing a district with a significant agricultural sector may join the Agriculture Committee.
The member's seniority: Seniority is often an important factor in committee assignments, particularly in the House of Representatives. Members who have been in Congress longer may have greater opportunities to join high-profile committees.
The needs of the party leadership: The party leadership may also play a role in committee assignments, particularly for members who are seen as potential leaders within the party. Party leaders may try to place members on committees that align with the party's priorities and where they can have the greatest impact on policy.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
The four factors that determine what committee a member of Congress joins are party affiliation, seniority, personal interests, and constituent needs.
Party affiliation is often the most important factor, as committee assignments are usually controlled by the majority party in each chamber. Seniority is also a significant factor, as more experienced members often receive priority in committee assignments. Personal interests can also play a role, as members may seek out committees that align with their expertise or policy goals.
Finally, constituent needs may influence committee assignments, as members may prioritize committees that address issues important to their constituents. Overall, committee assignments are a key way that members of Congress can shape policy and influence the legislative process.
Learn more about Congress: https://brainly.com/question/779570
#SPJ11
Related Questions
Most homicides involve victims who are ______ and offenders who are _______
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:A majority of homicides involve offenders and victims who share a large number of characteristics. The most typical homicide involves a victim and offender who are similar in age, race/ethnicity, gender, and prior involvement in the criminal justice system.
Julie was pulled over by police at 2:00 am and was charged with breaking the curfew law in her town. She was fined and released back to her parents. Which court relates to this case
Answers
The court that relates to the case of Julie being pulled over by police at 2:00 am and being charged with breaking the curfew law in her town is the Juvenile court.
Juvenile courts are courts established for dealing with legal issues involving minors or juveniles who are not yet of legal age to be tried as adults in most jurisdictions.
In this case, since Julie was released back to her parents, it can be inferred that she is a minor, hence the case would have been handled by the Juvenile court. The Juvenile court is mandated with the responsibility of dealing with cases involving minors such as curfew violations, runaways, truancy, and other delinquent acts.
Juvenile courts are designed to address legal matters involving minors who have not reached the age of majority. They handle a range of issues related to juvenile delinquency, including curfew violations, truancy, and other offenses committed by underage individuals. These courts aim to provide rehabilitation and support for young offenders rather than focusing solely on punishment.
To learn more about Juvenile court
https://brainly.com/question/11399114
#SPJ11
Which method did some white southerners use to try to overcome republican rule?.
Answers
Answer:
After the Civil War, some white southerners used various methods to try to overcome Republican rule, including voter intimidation, violence, and fraud. These methods were part of a larger effort to suppress the political power of African Americans and maintain white supremacy in the South. Other methods included the use of paramilitary groups like the Ku Klux Klan, as well as legal challenges and court cases aimed at limiting the rights of African Americans and other minority groups.
After a lengthy pursuit involving one assailant and 2 Troopers, the assailants vehicle had been disabled, the assailant decides to flee from the troopers on foot and was seen with a shotgun on his back, and a pistol on his side. The senior trooper on scene fired upon the assailant incapacitating him because he felt there was probable cause that the suspect presented a serious threat of injury or death to officers or others. What popular case law could apply in defense of the officer in this situation?
Answers
Answer:
I would think that only if they are pointing the guns at the officers or other individuals.
Explanation:
I found this on the internet though. Hope it helps some.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/can-police-use-lethal-force-fleeing-suspect
Can police officers shoot at fleeing individuals?
Only in very narrow circumstances. A seminal 1985 Supreme Court case, Tennessee vs. Garner, held that the police may not shoot at a fleeing person unless the officer reasonably believes that the individual poses a significant physical danger to the officer or others in the community. That means officers are expected to take other, less-deadly action during a foot or car pursuit unless the person being chased is seen as an immediate safety risk.
In other words, a police officer who fires at a fleeing man who a moment earlier murdered a convenience store clerk may have reasonable grounds to argue that the shooting was justified. But if that same robber never fired his own weapon, the officer would likely have a much harder argument.
“You don’t shoot fleeing felons. You apprehend them unless there are exigent circumstances — emergencies — that require urgent police action to safeguard the community as a whole,” said Greg Gilbertson, a police practices expert and criminal justice professor at Centralia College in Washington state.
Statistics on arson are limited in the sense that only fires classified as arson are reported to agencies like the FBI. True False
Answers
Answer:
This is true.
Agencies must classify arson as fires.I hope this helped at all.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
The Sherman Act, the Clayton Act and the Federal Trade Commission Act are all examples of legislation designed to curb anticompetitive business practices. True or False
Answers
The Sherman Act, the Clayton Act, and the Federal Trade Commission Act are all examples of legislation aimed at curbing anticompetitive business practices. The statement is true.
The Sherman Act, enacted in 1890, is a federal law in the United States that prohibits monopolistic and anticompetitive practices. It prohibits agreements and actions that restrain trade and prevent competition.
The Clayton Act, passed in 1914, further strengthened antitrust laws by addressing specific practices such as price discrimination, exclusive dealing, and mergers and acquisitions that may substantially lessen competition.
The Federal Trade Commission Act, also enacted in 1914, established the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to enforce and regulate fair business practices, including investigating and preventing unfair methods of competition and deceptive trade practices. These acts collectively aim to foster fair competition and prevent the abuse of market power.
Visit here to learn more about anticompetitive:
brainly.com/question/1159660
#SPJ11
Two equal forces act in opposite directions on object A. Two unequal forces act in opposite directions on object B. If these are the only forces acting on objects A and B.
Answers
d
Explanation:
Equal forces acting in opposite directions are called balanced forces. Balanced forces actingon an object will not change the object's motion. When you add equal forces inopposite direction, the net force is zero.
1. Look at the Image called Judicial Referees.This political cartoon best depicts what important government concept
2. Look at the Image called Judicial Referees. What does the team called Legislative lions represent? How about the team called Executive Eagles?
Answers
2. The Legislative Lions represent the legislative branch, also known as the U.S. Congress. The Congress consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and their job is primarily to make laws, consider confirming cabinet / government appointees (Only the Senate), declare war if necessary, provide money, approve treaties, impeach and remove an office holder if necessary, and other legislative duties.
The team called Executive Eagles represent the Executive Branch. The Executive Branch is known for the U.S. President. The President works in the Executive Branch, as does his Vice-President, cabinet and other federal government employees. The Executive Branch is run by the President, who’s job is to sign or veto (deny) any laws passed by Congress, sign treaties, enforce the laws passed by congress and signed by the President, represent the United States abroad, lead the U.S. Armed Forces, and overall, be the head leader of the USA, from a vision standpoint.
Hope this helps.
A court renders a judgment which authorizes a lien to be placed against the defendant's house, car, and personal belongings. This is an example of a
Answers
legal action taken to secure payment of a debt owed by the defendant. The lien creates a security interest in the defendant's assets and serves as collateral for the debt.
The creditor can then enforce the lien by seizing and selling the property if the defendant fails to pay the debt. Liens can be voluntary, such as when a borrower pledges property as collateral for a loan, or involuntary, such as when a court issues a judgment lien against a debtor's property. In this case, the court's judgment authorizing a lien against the defendant's house, car, and personal belongings is an example of an involuntary lien.
Learn more about payment here:https://brainly.com/question/15136793
#SPJ11
Ok we're going to be looking at border security issues for several countries around the world including of course, America. I want you to get a feel for three current state of order security in America and in one other nation in the world. You pick the nation you are going to be dealing with throughout the semester along with America. Each week I'll post an assignment referring to America and you will complete that assignment as it pertains to US but also as it pertains to the nation you select. For instance, if you choose Israel and I assign you to tell me the number of security personnel assigned to customs issues, you'll tell me the number in American customs, and Israeli customs.
This week I want you to give me at least 250 words explaining the state of border security in America, and of course in the country you've chosen. (You'll use this same alternate country throughout the semester so put a little thought into it. The 'state' will be based on fact but you can also use some of your own opinion.
Answers
Both the United States and Canada recognize the importance of border security in maintaining national sovereignty, protecting public safety, and facilitating legitimate travel and trade. While each country faces unique challenges and employs distinct strategies, both strive to strike a balance between security measures and the facilitation of cross-border activities.
What informs their border security?For this semester, focus on comparing the state of border security in the United States and Canada.
United States: Border security in the United States has always been a crucial concern due to its vast land borders with Canada and Mexico, as well as its extensive coastlines. The United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP) plays a central role in securing the borders by ensuring the lawful movement of people, goods, and services while preventing the entry of unauthorized individuals and contraband.
Canada: While Canada shares the longest undefended border in the world with the United States, border security remains a priority for both countries. The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) is responsible for border management and protection, ensuring the integrity of Canada's borders while facilitating legitimate trade and travel.
Overall, both the United States and Canada recognize the importance of border security in maintaining national sovereignty, protecting public safety, and facilitating legitimate travel and trade. While each country faces unique challenges and employs distinct strategies, both strive to strike a balance between security measures and the facilitation of cross-border activities.
learn more about border security: https://brainly.com/question/9630000
#SPJ1
What are the categories of controlled substances and how are they different from one another?
Answers
Controlled substances are drugs and other substances that are regulated by the government due to their potential for abuse and dependence, as well as their medical benefits. There are five categories, or schedules, of controlled substances in the United States, as defined by the Controlled Substances Act:
Schedule I: This category includes drugs that have no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Examples include heroin, LSD, and marijuana.
Schedule II: This category includes drugs that have a high potential for abuse and dependence, but also have some accepted medical uses. Examples include oxycodone, fentanyl, and Adderall.
Schedule III: This category includes drugs that have a moderate to low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include codeine and anabolic steroids.
Schedule IV: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include Xanax and Ambien.
Schedule V: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include cough medicines that contain codeine.
The categories are differentiated based on the substance's medical uses, potential for abuse, and likelihood of causing dependence. The stricter regulations on Schedule I substances reflect the fact that they are considered to have a higher potential for harm and abuse, while Schedule V substances are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse and dependence. The schedules are used to guide the regulation of these substances, including their manufacture, distribution, and prescription.
g Supply
Question 1 (20 points)
What is the principle of the Law of Supply?
a
Ob
The lower the price, the larger the quantity produced.
The higher the price, the larger the quantity produced.
The lower the price, the more manufacturers will produce the good.
The higher the price, the smaller the quantity produced.
C С
d
Question 2020 points)
Answers
Answer:
The higher the price, the larger the quantity produced.
Explanation:
The Principle of the Law of Supply has nothing to do with Law. It relates to economics.
A good case to illustrate the Law of Supply would be Apple iPhones. Prices remained very high therefore, the quantity was LARGE.
Conversely, during the pandemic people were not spending and out of jobs. Apple responded with a much affordable iPhone. *Everything is driven by market forces.
In which type of jurisdiction does a sovereign
have power over a defendant because the
defendant is accused of engaging in an act either
in or through contact with the place in which the
court is located?
Oa. venue
4
Ob. concurrent jurisdiction
Oc. subject matter jurisdiction
Od. personal jurisdiction
Answers
Answer:
b which is concurrent jurisdiction
1.) Describe an economic problem the government in America is trying to solve. What solution to this public policy issue do you think would work best?
2.) Explain why this policy would be the best solution using Sowell's three questions.
3.) Why is your proposed solution the best response to this issue?
4.) What is the cost of your proposed solution?
ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is there evidence (statistics or statements from experts) from a credible source that shows your proposed solution would work? Remember you can use the Helpful Links tab on our class homepage.
Answers
An economic issue the government in America is trying to handle is the problem the inflation. The solution that can be used to combat it is called contractionary monetary policy.
A rise in the nation's unemployment rate could be a cost of implementing contractionary monetary policy.
What is the most effective strategy for reducing inflation in the economy?Implementing a contractionary monetary policy is a common method of controlling inflation. A contractionary policy aims to lower the amount of money available in an economy by reducing bond prices and boosting interest rates. Price declines, as well as slower inflation, and less consumption follow as a result.
One crucial monetary strategy to fight inflation is to manage the flow of money through the economy. If the money supply shrinks, prices will rise and demand will decrease.
Note that Another method of reducing the amount of money in circulation is when the government bans certain coins or denominations of paper money. As a result of the economic slowdown and decreasing production, businesses hire fewer personnel.
Learn more about Raising inflation from
https://brainly.com/question/8149429
#SPJ1
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
Answers
A small amount of alcohol leaves the body through the skin, in the breath and in urine.
The amount of alcohol in the blood at any time varies depending on the amount, the strength and how quickly the alcohol is consumed. Individual factors also contribute, such as body type, age, gender and how well the liver can break down alcohol to use for energy.
An insurer goes bankrupt and is unable to pay on any of its insureds' claims. Which of the following will happen?
A. The insureds will not be paid.
B. The claims will be paid by a nationally-based program.
C. The claims will be paid by the state Life and Health Guaranty Association.
D. The claims will be paid by the state Department of Insurance.
Answers
The insurer's claims will be paid by the state Life and Health Guaranty Association.
When insurers breach contractual obligations because of financial impairment, the New Jersey Life and Health Guaranty Association was established to safeguard policyowners, reinsurer, and recipients under life insurance policies, health insurances, annuity contracts, and supplemental contracts. The entity accepting the risk and promising to cover losses that occur during the policy period is known as the insurer, often known as a "insurance business." For regular premium payments, the insurer agrees to cover losses. The insurer is one of the parties who agrees to cover potential financial losses that may result from a calamity in an insurance contract. The insurance provider is able to cover the losses incurred by the insured.
Learn more about insurance here:
https://brainly.com/question/989296
#SPJ4
Christine listed her house with you. Tailleur represents the buyer, Rebecca, and the seller's mother, Freida, is paying your commission. Which of these factors determines how legal agency is determined in this situation?
A.) Tailleur represents the buyer
B.) Freida is paying your
commission
C.) Christine listed the property
with you.
D.) Christine's mother, Freida,
owns the house you listed
Answers
Which of these factors determines how legal agency is: Christine listed the property with you.
The law of agency is an area of business law managing a bunch of authoritative, semi legally binding and non-authoritative trustee connections that affect an individual, called the specialist, that is approved to follow up for another (called the head) to make legitimate relations with an outsider. Concisely, it very well might be alluded to as the equivalent connection between a head and a specialist by which the head, explicitly or certainly, approves the specialist to work under their influence and for their sake. The specialist is, hence, expected to haggle for the benefit of the head or bring them and outsiders into authoritative relationship. This part of law isolates and directs the connections between:
agents and administrators (inside relationship), known as the head specialist relationship;
agents and the outsiders with whom they bargain for their administrators' benefit (outer relationship); and
directors and the outsiders when the agents bargain.
to know more about authoritative click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13572643
#SPJ4
Why is DNA profiling not more commonly used in criminal investigations?
Answers
Answer:
DNA can be used to identify criminals with incredible accuracy when biological evidence exists. ... In cases where a suspect is identified, a sample of that person's DNA can be compared to evidence from the crime scene. The results of this comparison may help establish whether the suspect committed the crime.
Explanation:
Is there a better solution to bail? Explain.
Answers
1. Explain your answers to the following questions:
• Why is public order necessary?
2. Does society have enough public order or too little?
Answers
2 we do not have enough public order people now a days do whatever they want in public
1
Which statement best describes recent voter trends in the United States?
• A.
People living in the Midwest and the South mostly vote Democratic.
B.
Women since the 1950s mostly vote Republican.
C
People living on the US coasts mostly vote for conservative candidates.
D.
Cuban American families mostly vote Republican.
Answers
The correct answer is option (C) Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican.
Why did Women since the 1950s mostly votes Republican?The Constitution was written in 1787, while the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776. There were other occasions when the United States was founded than these. These seven men—George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison—are regarded as the principal Founding Fathers in order of significance.
While many other people also played a part in the establishment of the United States, most people regard these seven to be the Founding Fathers. The Americas were found in 1492, according to Christopher Columbus.
To learn more about vote visit:
https://brainly.in/question/20481185
#SPJ13
In order to be effective, a lien should be:
A. recorded.
B. published.
C. renewed.
D. delivered.
Answers
In order to be effective, a lien should be recorded. The Option A.
Why is recording a lien important?This is an essential step to ensure that it is legally recognized and enforceable. When a lien is recorded, it become matter of public record which means interested parties like potential buyers, creditors or lenders can easily find out about its existence and its priority.
This also establishes the lienholder's right to the property in question, which can be crucial in case of a dispute or default. It also creates a time-stamp that can be used to calculate the expiration date of the lien or the deadline for renewing it.
Read more about lien
brainly.com/question/13493911
#SPJ1
richard nixon tried to resist giving his taped conversations to the special prosecutor and the congress by claiming that
Answers
In order to protect the national interest and retain the confidentiality of discussions inside the executive branch, Nixon claimed that the idea of executive privilege allowed him the authority to withhold sensitive material, such as the tapes, from other congress government branches.
Nixon merely wanted to record every discussion he had in order to facilitate writing his memoirs, so he put the recordings in the White House. Ford believed he was spending too much time dealing with the fallout from Watergate and lacked the time to carry out his duties as president.
To put an end to the situation, he gave the pardon. In his offices, President Nixon kept a tape recorder, and he recorded a lot of conversations.
Learn more about congress Visit: brainly.com/question/491441
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Richard nixon tried to resist giving his taped conversations to the special prosecutor and the congress claiming it by using what?
Helen needs a replacement ball bearing for this part. the surface area of each spherical ball bearing is approximately 452. 16 square millimeters. what is the radius of the bearing that helen needs to buy? round your answer to a whole number
Answers
Helen needs to buy a ball bearing with a radius of approximately 6 millimeters.
What is the radius of the ball bearing that Helen needs to buy if the surface area of each spherical ball bearing is approximately 452.16 square millimeters?To find the radius of the ball bearing that Helen needs to buy, we can use the formula for the surface area of a sphere:
Surface Area =\(4πr^2\)
Given that the surface area of the ball bearing is approximately 452.16 square millimeters, we can set up the equation:
\(452.16 = 4πr^2\)
To solve for the radius (r), we need to isolate it. Divide both sides of the equation by 4π:
\(452.16 / (4π) = r^2\)
To find the value of r, we can simplify the expression on the left-hand side:
\(113.04 / π = r^2\)
To solve for r, we take the square root of both sides:
\(√(113.04 / π) = r\)
Calculating the square root and rounding to the nearest whole number, we get:
r ≈ 6
Learn more about Helen needs
brainly.com/question/20033859
#SPJ11
What are the different types of forensic evidence? What problems are presented? What recommendations are provided to fix probles? Are the recommendations realistic? Why/why not?
Answers
Overall, while there is room for improvement in the collection and analysis of forensic evidence, the challenges associated with implementing recommendations should be carefully considered in order to ensure that any changes are feasible and effective
What is forensic evidence?Generally, There are several types of forensic evidence that can be used in criminal investigations, including:
DNA evidence: DNA can be extracted from a variety of sources, including blood, semen, hair, and skin cells. DNA evidence can be used to identify suspects or link them to a crime scene.
Fingerprints: Fingerprints can be used to identify suspects and link them to a crime scene. Fingerprints are unique to each individual, making them a valuable form of forensic evidence.
Ballistics evidence: Ballistics evidence includes bullets, casings, and firearms. This type of evidence can be used to link a weapon to a crime or to identify a suspect.
Trace evidence: Trace evidence includes fibers, hair, and other small pieces of material that can be found at a crime scene. This type of evidence can be used to link a suspect to a crime scene or to identify the type of weapon used in a crime.
One problem presented with forensic evidence is the potential for contamination or mishandling of the evidence. For example, if DNA evidence is not properly collected, stored, or analyzed, it may be compromised or rendered inadmissible in court. Similarly, fingerprints may be difficult to recover if they are not properly preserved or collected.
To address these issues, recommendations have been made to improve the collection, handling, and analysis of forensic evidence. These recommendations include implementing standardized procedures for evidence collection and analysis, improving training for forensic analysts, and establishing oversight mechanisms to ensure that evidence is handled properly.
While these recommendations are realistic in theory, there are challenges to implementing them in practice. For example, there may be resource constraints that make it difficult to train and retain skilled forensic analysts, or to implement standardized procedures across different jurisdictions. Additionally, there may be resistance from law enforcement agencies or other stakeholders who are accustomed to operating in a certain way.
Read more about forensic evidence
https://brainly.com/question/15902971
#SPJ1
Which five amendments do you consider to be of greatest importance? Write a reason for each one.
Answers
Answer 1,2,8,13 15
Explanation: 1st amendment gives people the rights to religion of their choice, it also gives people the right to speak up for what they believe
2nd amendment allows people to keep and bear arms for one to protect themselves and other around them
8th amendment makes sure people do not get a cruel punishment for something minor
13th amendment allowed slaves to be free, giving them a chance into their own lives
15th amendment makes sure you cannot deny someone the right to vote based on gender or color
Which is an example of a secondary source?
photograph of an event
government census record
analysis of an event by someone who did not participate in the event
account of an event from the perspective of someone who participated in the event
Answers
Essay help- Discuss and resolve the debate, issue, or question of whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit the number of designated classes; e.g., LBTQI etc., or expand them. At what point should the “queering” or “queerness” end? Include in your discussion, how useful the race-class-gender paradigm has been in criminology and its expansion or refinement
Answers
Answer:
The debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is an ongoing issue. Some argue that limiting the number of designated classes, such as LBTQI, can lead to exclusion of marginalized groups within the LGBTQI community. On the other hand, others argue that expanding the number of designated classes can lead to an overly fragmented approach, making it difficult to address the root causes of crime and social inequality.
Taking a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual could help resolve this debate. Rather than focusing on a set of pre-determined classes, criminologists could determine how different forms of social inequality intersect and compound to produce distinct experiences of victimization, criminalization, and marginalization.
The race-class-gender paradigm helps understanding how social inequality operates in different contexts. It recognizes that social categories such as race, class, and gender intersect to create unique experiences of marginalization and disadvantage. However, some argue that this paradigm needs to be expanded or refined to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups. Critical race theorists support the inclusion of additional categories such as immigration status, sexuality, and disability.
In queering criminology, people should recognize that queerness is not limited to sexuality or gender identity. It can also refer to the ways in which norms, values, and institutions shape our understanding of gender and sexuality. Therefore, the “queering” of criminology should not be limited to LBTQI communities. It should also explore how norms and institutions shape our understanding of race, class, and other social categories.
[Get instant help with essays, answers, and research papers from proffrank(at)g m ail.c om. Sorry for this, but kindly remove this part before submitting the assignment. Let's talk:)]
In conclusion, the debate over whether intersectional and/or queer criminology ought to limit or expand the number of designated classes is a complex issue. To address this issue, criminologists should take a nuanced approach that considers the unique experiences and intersectional identities of each individual. They should also continue to refine and expand the race-class-gender paradigm to fully account for the experiences of marginalized groups.
Explanation:
The race-class-gender paradigm has been useful in criminology as it has allowed scholars to examine how these three factors intersect to produce different experiences of oppression. However, this paradigm has been criticized for being too narrow and not taking into account the experiences of individuals who do not fit into these three categories. Therefore, it is important to expand the paradigm to include other identities, such as sexual orientation, ability, and nationality.
In terms of limiting or expanding designated classes, I believe that it is important to expand them to include a broader range of identities. By doing so, we can better understand how different forms of oppression intersect and produce different experiences of violence and crime. However, it is also important to recognize that there is a point where the "queering" or "queerness" should end. We should not create so many categories that we lose sight of the individuals we are trying to understand.
In conclusion, intersectional and queer criminology should expand the number of designated classes to include a broader range of identities. However, we should also be mindful of not creating too many categories that we lose sight of the individuals we are trying to understand. The race-class-gender paradigm has been useful in criminology, but it is important to expand it to include other identities.
Keith lends his car to Jermaine, who drives with two other friends to the home of a marijuana dealer. The three men break into the home, intending to steal a safe full of cash. The drug dealer is unexpectedly at home, however, and in a struggle, Jermaine winds up murdering him. What rule allows local prosecutors to charge Keith with first-degree murder? If you were the prosecutor, discuss why you think you’d be successful prosecuting using this rule
Answers
Under the Felony Murder Rule, the local prosecutors can charge Keith with first-degree murder. The rule holds that any death that results from a felony crime makes the offender(s) guilty of murder.
This applies whether the murder was intentional, unintentional, or accidental, so long as the murder occurred during the commission of the felony crime. The prosecution would be successful by prosecuting Keith under the Felony Murder Rule because he lent his car to Jermaine, knowing that they were heading to the home of a marijuana dealer.
Thus, Keith was aware of the criminal intent of his friends to commit a felony crime.Additionally, the three men broke into the drug dealer's house with the intention of stealing a safe full of cash. Jermaine then committed murder while the three were in the commission of the felony crime, and hence, all three are liable for first-degree murder under the Felony Murder Rule.
To know more about prosecutors visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32247597
#SPJ11
Which of the following must an assignor warrant to the assignee per the KREC Assignment of Listing Contracts to New Principal Broker agreement?
A. That the assignee will be held harmless from any claims or demands related to the assignor's failure to perform.
B. That the contract is fully in force and assignable.
C. That the contract terms are subject to change.
D. That the terms of the contract will be carried out.
Answers
Based on the information available, the correct answer would be B. That the contract is fully in force and assignable.
In an assignment agreement, the assignor typically warrants to the assignee that the contract being assigned is valid, enforceable, and assignable. This means that the assignor guarantees that the contract is legally binding and that they have the authority to transfer their rights and obligations to the assignee.
Option A may not be a typical warranty included in an assignment agreement. However, it's possible that parties could negotiate additional provisions regarding indemnification or holding harmless, but it would not be a standard warranty in this context.
Option C suggests that the contract terms are subject to change, but an assignor would typically warrant that the contract being assigned is accurate and current, without any impending changes to the terms.
Option D, while related to performance, is not specifically a warranty that the assignor would typically make to the assignee. The assignor is transferring their rights and obligations under the contract to the assignee, but it does not necessarily mean that the assignor will personally carry out the terms of the contract.
Therefore, option B is the most appropriate answer in the given context.
To know more about Broker agreement here
https://brainly.com/question/15182173
#SPJ4