A suspect leaves a written document as evidence, what are two ways forensics may match the document to the suspect?

Answer:

Specific performance is a type of equitable remedy available in a breach of contract action. It is a remedy based on the concept of fairness. Specific performance recognizes that money may not adequately compensate the non-breaching party in certain situations.

Explanation:

A Proposition of Policy Speech makes a persuasive argument about a course of action regarding a controversial topic of social or public concern.

While the proposition is based on some value premise, the focus of the discussion is not necessarily on this underlying premise, but more on the desirability and ability to act.

Policies are a set of general guidelines. They outline your organization's plan for tackling certain issues. The purpose of policies is to communicate an organization’s values, philosophy, and culture.

The term may apply to government, public sector organizations and groups, as well as individuals, Presidential executive orders, corporate privacy policies, and parliamentary rules of order are all examples of policy. Policy differs from rules or law.

Learn more about Policies here,

https://brainly.com/question/3521988

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer is A

Explanation:

The kind of case that the jury has decided would be:

A). Civil

The courts deal with a number of cases which include:

As per the details provided, the given case would be characterized as a Civil Case as it is concerned with the conflicts that exist between Mrs. Garcia and Mr. Wakefield.

The decision of the court would aim to resolve this and hence, it exemplifies a civil case.

Thus, option A is the correct answer.

Learn more about "Jury" here:

brainly.com/question/20407684

As Sam has set three fires at separate locations over the period of six months. The label that best fits Sam is spree arsonist. The Option B is correct.

In U.S., Arsonist refers to a person who habitually and compulsively sets fires. Under U.S. Law, an arson means malicious burning of the dwelling of another, though the actual crime may entail the burning of any structure or object. It's been noted that many serial arsonists are actually frustrated or disgruntled firefighters, who fall into the category of Pyromaniacs.

The FBI describes a arson as a "three or more fire setting episodes, with a characteristic emotional cooling-off period between fires". An arsonists that only set two arson fires or are arrested after setting two arson fires, are dubbed spree arsonists.

Read more about spree arsonist

brainly.com/question/3788903

#SPJ1

Right can be fliped to responsibilities because inorder to get rights you have to get reponsibilities and be responsible with your rights

The concept of assisted self-killing is controversial. It is legal in some states and illegal in others. Hence, the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.

Assisted self-killing is a medical practice where a terminally ill patient is provided with the means to end their own life, typically through the administration of medication. It is a controversial and heavily debated topic, with proponents arguing for individual autonomy and compassion, and opponents arguing against intentionally ending human life.

Wilfred's request was related to self-killing. From a legal standpoint, the act of assisting in self-killing is a criminal offense in most states. Therefore, Martha could be subject to criminal charges for her actions. If manslaughter charges were filed against Martha, and I were on the jury, my decision would depend on the specific laws and circumstances of the case, such as the laws related to assisted self-killing in the said state. If the pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician, the situation would be different. In some states, assisted self-killing may be legal under certain circumstances, such as if the patient has a terminal illness and is in unbearable pain. In such cases, physicians may prescribe medication to ease the patient's pain, even if it may shorten their life. Some argue that individuals have the right to end their own lives in cases of terminal illness and unbearable pain, while others argue that it is morally wrong to intentionally end a human life. Legislators may consider factors such as individual autonomy, protection of vulnerable populations, and the potential impact on medical practice when deciding whether or not to legalize assisted self-killing.

Therefore, the concept of assisted self-killing is controversial and the exact answer to this question will depend on the state of residence of the patient.

Learn more about assisted self-killing, here:

https://brainly.com/question/4748133

#SPJ2

The complete question is: Problems 9.1 Law and Justice Problem 9.1 The Case of The Dying Cancer Patient - Wilfred, age 75, has been suffering from cancer for 10 years. The pain associated with the cancer is severe and has become worse over time. Wilfred's doctors say there is no treatment to either slow down the cancer's growth or substantially reduce the pain. Wilfred asks Martha, his wife of 50 years, to relieve him of the terrible pain. He asks her to bring him a bottle of pills that will help him end his own life. Martha cannot stand watching Wilfred suffer anymore and gives him the pills. He swallows them all, slowly fades off to sleep, and dies. 1. Was Wilfred's request related to self-killing? Explain your answer. 2. If you were the district attorney in the state where Martha lives, would you file criminal charges against her? Explain. 3. If manslaughter charges were filed and you were on the jury, would you vote to convict Martha? Give your reasons. If Martha were convicted, what sentence should she receive? Why? 4. If the bottle of pills had been given to Wilfred by a physician instead of by his wife, would your answers have been different? Give your reasons. 5. If you were a state legislator, would you be in favor of or against a law allowing assisted self-killing? Explain why or why not?

Answer:

The number of repeats within an STR is referred to as an allele. For instance, the STR known as D7S820, found on chromosome 7, contains between 5 and 16 repeats of GATA. Therefore, there are 12 different alleles possible for the D7S820 STR.

Answer:

1

Explanation:

Answer:

the answer is 1.

Explanation:

200/200

=1

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer:

it's to hard to explain but why he is stealing stealing is not good he must be perfect on job and yes it cost of the training itself

E. Equitable orders and remedies of the Court of Chancery took precedence over the legal decisions and remedies of the law courts.

In the early development of English common law, the Court of Chancery played a significant role in administering equitable justice. While the law courts focused on the application of legal principles and remedies, the Court of Chancery emphasized fairness, flexibility, and remedies based on equity. Equitable orders and remedies from the Court of Chancery were considered to have precedence over the legal decisions and remedies of the law courts. This distinction between legal and equitable jurisdictions was an important feature of the early English legal system.

learn more about Chancery here

https://brainly.com/question/31670102

#SPJ11

A pick-up truck may be eligible for coverage under a personal auto policy even if it is used for incidental business purposes.

Personal auto policy coverage can extend to business use, but only to a limited extent. Let us learn about it.The following incidental business purposes are usually covered under personal auto policy:Transporting people and goods: If a person uses their pick-up truck to transport people and goods for their business, their personal auto policy will likely provide coverage.

The policy will cover damages caused by an accident in case they have been involved in one.Driving to meetings: If the policyholder is driving to a business meeting or event, their personal auto policy will cover them while they drive. This includes driving to meet a client or to attend a conference.

The following incidental business purposes are not covered under personal auto policy:Regular deliveries: If the policyholder is using their pick-up truck for regular deliveries for their business, they need commercial auto insurance. A personal auto policy will not cover regular deliveries.

Carrying business equipment: If the policyholder is using their pick-up truck to carry business equipment regularly, they will need commercial auto insurance. A personal auto policy will not provide coverage if the truck is being used for business purposes regularly.

For more such question on auto policy visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28519315

#SPJ8

Maria has high levels of Pollyannaism.

Learn more about government policies:

https://brainly.com/question/17492456

Cultural learning may be accomplished in three ways:

Cultural learning is the process through which a group of people or animals within a civilization or culture learn and transmit knowledge. Learning styles are heavily impacted by how society interacts with its children and youth. In the last fifty years, a cross-cultural study has mostly concentrated on contrasts between Eastern and Western civilizations. Individuals can gain talents that they would not be able to master on their own during the course of their lives through cultural learning. Cultural learning is thought to be especially essential for humans. When compared to the appearance of adult teeth, humans are weaned at a young age.

To learn more about Cultural learning, click

https://brainly.com/question/29024017

#SPJ1

Answer:

The broken windows theory, defined in 1982 by social scientists James Wilson and George Kelling, drawing on earlier research by Stanford University psychologist Philip Zimbardo, argues that no matter how rich or poor a neighborhood, one broken window would soon lead to many more windows being broken: “One unrepaired ...

Explanation:

The NEPA created an agency called the council on environmental quality and required that an environmental impact statement be prepared for any major federal action that might significantly affect the environmental quality.

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 was created to ensure federal agencies consider the environmental impacts of their actions and decisions.

It was created in 1970. They establish programs that are aimed at reducing pollution and protecting the environment.

Describe the federal laws and regulations in place to prevent air pollution.

Learn more about NEPA here:

Answer:

The court held that the proper measure of damages should be based on Hawkins's expected value from the parties' contract — the difference in value between a 100% good hand and the hairy hand that Hawkins actually received.

Answer:D

Explanation:

Criminal justice stories in the media The death of George Floyd in police custody. The ideology associated with this story is systemic racism within law enforcement agencies.

The questions presented by this issue are whether or not police officers are adequately trained to de-escalate situations without using excessive force and whether or not police departments are held accountable for officers who abuse their power. Data presented in this story includes body camera footage of the incident, witness testimony, and statistics on police brutality.

The college admissions scandal involving celebrities and wealthy families. The ideology associated with this story is the prevalence of white privilege and elitism in higher education. The questions presented by this issue are whether or not wealthy families have an unfair advantage in the college admissions process, whether or not standardized testing is an accurate measure of academic potential, and whether or not students from low-income backgrounds are disproportionately affected by this system.

To learn more about  Criminal justice visit here:

brainly.com/question/30629034

#SPJ11

The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon.

The Watergate scandal was a political scandal that occurred in the United States during the 1970s. The scandal arose after a break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate office complex in Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1972.The events that followed the break-in resulted in President Richard Nixon's resignation from office in August 1974.

Nixon was accused of trying to cover up his involvement in the break-in and other illegal activities. The phrase "I've decided not to tell you about the alleged shipwreck" implies that Nixon's denial of the Watergate break-in is hard to believe, and Attorney General Mitchell would support Nixon. This statement is related to the Watergate scandal and suggests that Nixon was involved in a cover-up.

To know more about Nixon's  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/1131063

#SPJ11

Question Completion:

What skills are required for a legal career?

Answer:

The skills required for a legal career are:

1. Dedication

2. Rational thinking

3. Ability to research

4. Focus

Explanation:

The above mentioned four skills are required of a legal practitioner, starting from the school days and throughout the practitioner's professional life.  Without these skills, success cannot be attained.  A legal practitioner must judge issues based on facts and reason, without employing emotions. Thinking rationally, employing reason instead of emotions in decisions, and carrying out in-depth research, the legal practitioner is set for career success.

Foucault rejects the notion that this system's development had been motivated by humanitarian ideals or that the original goal of this punitive mentality was to encourage rehabilitation.

Paul-Michel Foucault was a French philosopher, author, political activist, literary critic, and historian of ideas.

The main focus of Foucault's theories is on how power and knowledge interact and how societal institutions employ them to exert social control.

Foucault rejected the titles of structuralist and postmodernist despite frequently being referred to as both.

Academics, particularly those involved in communication studies, anthropology, psychology, sociology, criminology, cultural studies, literary theory, feminism, Marxism, and critical theory, have been impacted by his ideas.

In the end, Foucault argues that how power is used and subjugated affects how an institution uses punishment.

He dismisses the assumption that the creation of this system had been inspired by any humanitarian principles or that the original intent of this punitive mindset was to promote rehabilitation.

Therefore, Foucault rejects the notion that this system's development had been motivated by humanitarian ideals or that the original goal of this punitive mentality was to encourage rehabilitation.

Know more about Foucault here:

https://brainly.com/question/14144264

#SPJ1

The right to freedom of religion,the right to due process,the right to vote and the right to freedom of speech  are included in the Bill of Rights found in the US Constitution.

A bill is a proposed law that must be approved by a legislature before it can become a law. It is a draft of a legislative proposal that is introduced in a legislature and, if it passes, it can become a law. The process of a bill becoming a law is known as the legislative process and it involves several steps. First, the bill must be proposed in either the house or the senate by a legislator. Secondly, the bill must be debated and voted upon by the members of the legislature. If the bill passes both chambers, it is then sent to the president to be signed into law. If the president signs the bill, it becomes a law and is enforced by the government.

To learn more about Bill

https://brainly.com/question/29550065

#SPJ1

The IRAC principle is a common legal analysis method that stands for Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. It is used to analyse legal cases and provide a structured analysis. Here are 6 case employment laws from the Caribbean, :

1. Case Law: Gibson v. Jamaican Airline Ltd.
The issue in this case was whether the airline's policy of mandatory retirement at age 60 violated employment discrimination laws.

The case involved a claim of age discrimination under employment laws. The court applied the relevant employment discrimination laws in the Caribbean and determined whether the airline's policy was in violation of these laws.

2. Case Law: Anderson v. Trinidad & Tobago Public Service Commission
The issue in this case was whether the government's requirement for male employees to retire at age 55 but allowing female employees to retire at age 60 violated the principle of gender equality.

This case examined gender equality in employment laws. The court analysed whether the different retirement ages for male and female employees constituted discrimination based on gender.

3. Case Law: Roberts v. Barbados Hotel Association
The issue in this case was whether the hotel association's decision to terminate an employee based on their sexual orientation violated employment laws.

This case dealt with discrimination based on sexual orientation in employment. The court examined whether the employee's termination was a violation of their rights under employment laws.

4. Case Law: Martin v. Antigua and Barbuda Broadcasting Service
The issue in this case was whether the broadcasting service's refusal to provide reasonable accommodations for an employee with a disability violated employment laws.

The court analysed whether the broadcasting service's failure to provide reasonable accommodations constituted a violation of employment laws.

5. Case Law: Grant v. Cayman Islands Government
The issue in this case was whether the government's failure to pay overtime wages to certain employees violated employment laws.

This case dealt with the issue of overtime wages. The court examined whether the government's failure to pay overtime to certain employees was a violation of employment laws.

6. Case Law: Edwards v. Bahamas Maritime Authority
The issue in this case was whether the maritime authority's decision to terminate an employee based on their political affiliation violated employment laws.

This case focused on political discrimination in employment. The court analysed whether the employee's termination was a violation of their rights under employment laws.

To know more about  Employment laws, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32735711

#SPJ11

Answer:

Monetary policy is the process by which the monetary authority of a country, generally the central bank, controls the supply of money in the economy by its control over interest rates in order to maintain price stability and achieve high economic growth.

Answer:

Suzy is expected to be charged with attempted murder.

Explanation:

Suzy showed a strong intention to kill her husband, even though her plan failed and she was unable to actually kill her. For this reason, she should be charged with attempted murder and since there is direct evidence that she wanted to kill Bob, it is likely that she would be convicted, even without actually carrying out the crime.

This accusation would be prevalent, even if Suzi had not caused Bob any injuries or injuries.

Answer:

Explanation:

Films that tell stories present a narrative that can be fictional or not, but whose central purpose is to engage and entertain the viewer, as in the film "Karma: What goes around, comes around.

What is the plot of the film?

This Korean film specifically was released in 2020, being the horror genre and tells the story of a teacher who finds her deceased father's diary, in the house where she lived in her childhood, and from there discovers secrets and mysteries involving such deaths. .

Therefore, cinematographic works aim to lead to emotion, reflection, personal expression, engagement and entertainment, being the analysis of what a good film is to be personal and based on the perspective of the spectator.