Based on an analysis of sample data, an article proposed the pdf f(x) = 0.55e-0.55(x - 1) when x ≥ 1 as a model for the distribution of X = time (sec) spent at the median line. (Round your answers to three decimal places.) (a) What is the probability that waiting time is at most 6 sec? More than 6 sec?
at most 6 sec P (X ≤ 6) = ______
more than 6 sec P (X > 6)
(b) What is the probability that waiting time is between 4 and 8 sec?

Answer:

18i, -7-i, -6+18i

Step-by-step explanation:

1. √-324

first take out the negative as √-1=i

√-324= i√324

324 =2*162

324=2*2*81

324=2*2*9*9

i√324=i√2*2*9*9= i* 2*9= 18i

3.

-4+7i-3-8i combine like terms

-4-3 -8i+7i = -7-i

5.

(1+5i)(4-2i) distribute

1*4 -1*2i +5i*4 -5i*(-2i) multiply

4 -2i +20i +10i² but i²= -1 so

4 -2i +20i -10 combine like terms

-6 +18i

Answer:

The function B has greater constant

Step-by-step explanation:

\(m(b) = \frac{20 - 15}{1 - 2} = - 5 \\ y = - 5x + c \\ when \: y = 20 \: \: \: \: \: and \: x = 1 \\ 20 = - 5 \times 1 = c \\ c = 25\)

(a)To solve the system of equations, x^2 - y^2 = 16 and x^2 - y = 7, we can use substitution or elimination method to find the values of x and y.

(b) To graph the solution set of the system of inequalities, x^2 - y^2 > 7 and x^2 - y < 0, we need to plot the boundaries and shade the appropriate regions based on the given inequalities.

(a)Let's use the substitution method to solve the system of equations:

From the second equation, we can rewrite it as x^2 = y + 7.

Substituting this value of x^2 in the first equation, we get (y + 7) - y^2 = 16.

Rearranging the equation, we have -y^2 + y + 7 - 16 = 0.

Simplifying further, we get -y^2 + y - 9 = 0.

Now, we can solve this quadratic equation for y by factoring or using the quadratic formula.

After finding the values of y, we can substitute them back into the second equation to find the corresponding values of x.

(b)To graph the solution set, we first graph the boundaries of the inequalities. For x^2 - y^2 > 7, we draw the curve of the equation x^2 - y^2 = 7, which represents a hyperbola. For x^2 - y < 0, we graph the curve of the equation x^2 - y = 0, which represents a parabola opening upwards.

Next, we need to determine which regions satisfy the given inequalities. For x^2 - y^2 > 7, the shaded region lies outside the hyperbola. For x^2 - y < 0, the shaded region lies below the parabola.

By combining the shaded regions of both inequalities, we find the solution set of the system of inequalities. It includes the regions outside the hyperbola and below the parabola. We label the corners of the shaded region to indicate the solution set accurately.

To learn more about parabola  Click Here: brainly.com/question/29267743

#SPJ11

Answer:

1) x = 55°

2) x = 30°

3) x = 68°

Step-by-step explanation:

In the given set of questions where it requires to find the unknown value of x to prove that v ||w:

The Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem states that for any given two parallel lines cut by a transversal, the measures of a pair of consecutive interior angles have a sum of 180°. Hence, the pair of consecutive interior angles are supplementary.

1.)  In the given diagram, the two consective interior angles are m ∠70° and m ∠ 2x°.  As defined by the Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem:

m ∠70° + m ∠ 2x° = 180°

Solve for x algebraically:

70° + 2x° =  180°

Subtract 70° from both sides:

70° - 70° + 2x° =  180° - 70°

2x° =  110°

Divide both sides by 2 to solve for x:

\(\LARGE\mathsf{\frac {2x^{\circ}}{2}\:=\:\frac{110^{\circ}}{2}}\)

x = 55°

Verify whether the value for x is valid:

70° + 2x° =  180°

70° + 2(55)° =  180°

70° + 110° =  180°

180° =  180° (True statement).

2) In the given diagram, the two consective interior angles are m ∠2x° and m ∠ 4x°.  As defined by the Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem:

m ∠2x° + m ∠ 4x° = 180°

Solve for x algebraically:

2x° + 4x° =  180°

Add like terms:

6x° = 180°

Divide both sides by 6 to solve for x:

\(\LARGE\mathsf{\frac {6x^{\circ}}{6}\:=\:\frac{180^{\circ}}{6}}\)

x = 30°

The Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem still applies in this question. The two consective interior angles are m ∠90° and m ∠ (x + 22)°.  As defined by the Consecutive Interior Angles Theorem:

m ∠90° + m ∠ (x + 22)° = 180°

Solve for x algebraically:

90° + x° + 22 =  180°

Combine like terms:

112° + x° = 180°

Subtract 112° from both sides to isolate x:

112° - 112° + x° = 180° - 112°

x = 68°

Verify whether the value for x is valid:

90° + x° + 22 =  180°

90° + 68° + 22 =  180°

180° =  180° (True statement).

Answer:

800

Step-by-step explanation:

= 2 (13 x 11 + 11 x 11 + 11 x 13 )

= 2 (143 + 121 + 143)

= 2 x 407

= 814 inch^2

nearest hundred = 800

80, answer = 800 inch^2

Answer:

see explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

the set of x- values ( the input ) are called the domain

Answer:

domain

Step-by-step explanation:

as the y values is the range

Answer: She bought 28 daises and 10 Tulips.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the number of daises bought.

Let y represent the number of tulips bought.

Your friend want to have 38 of her favorite flowers. This means that

x + y = 38

Her favorite flowers are daisies at 1.50 each and tulips at 2.50 each if the total bill was 67, it means that

1.5x + 2.5y = 67 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1

Substituting x = 38 - y into equation 1, it becomes

1.5(38 - y) + 2.5y = 67

57 - 1.5y + 2.5y = 67

- 1.5y + 2.5y = 67 - 57

y = 10

x = 38 - y = 38 - 10

x = 28

Answer: She bought 28 daises and 10 Tulips.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x represent the number of daises bought.

Let y represent the number of tulips bought.

Your friend want to have 38 of her favorite flowers. This means that

x + y = 38

Her favorite flowers are daisies at 1.50 each and tulips at 2.50 each if the total bill was 67, it means that

1.5x + 2.5y = 67 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1

Substituting x = 38 - y into equation 1, it becomes

1.5(38 - y) + 2.5y = 67

57 - 1.5y + 2.5y = 67

- 1.5y + 2.5y = 67 - 57

y = 10

x = 38 - y = 38 - 10

x = 28

An estimate of the change in f between the two points is approximately 1.96. To estimate the change Δf = f(2.03, 0.95) − f(2,1), we need to use the equation Δf ≈ fx (a, b)Δx + fy(a, b)Δy, where fx and fy represent the partial derivatives of f with respect to x and y, evaluated at the point (a, b).

First, let's find the partial derivatives of f:

fx(x,y) = 3x^2y^-4
fy(x,y) = -4x^3y^-5

Next, we need to evaluate fx and fy at the point (a,b) = (2,1):

fx(2,1) = 3(2)^2(1)^-4 = 3(4) = 12
fy(2,1) = -4(2)^3(1)^-5 = -32

Now we can use the equation:

Δf ≈ fx(2,1)Δx + fy(2,1)Δy

To find Δx and Δy, we subtract the x and y values of the two points:

Δx = 2.03 - 2 = 0.03
Δy = 0.95 - 1 = -0.05

Substituting the values we have:

Δf ≈ 12(0.03) - 32(-0.05)
Δf ≈ 0.36 + 1.6
Δf ≈ 1.96

Therefore, an estimate of the change in f between the two points is approximately 1.96.

Learn more about equation here:

brainly.com/question/29565768

#SPJ11

Come on bro you are way too young for that

Answer:

no you can only use side side side when all of your triangles are equilateral triangles

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

So basically, we would need to divide to the nearest 0.01 or hundredths place. All you would need to do is round from each place which would soon get you to 11,580.00. Simple right!!

I hope this helps!! Have a good rest of your day! :)

The statement that correctly compares the two functions include the following: D. They have different y-intercepts but the same end behavior.

In Mathematics and Geometry, the y-intercept is sometimes referred to as an initial value or vertical intercept and the y-intercept of any graph such as a linear equation or function, generally occur at the point where the value of "x" is equal to zero (x = 0).

By critically observing the graph and the functions shown in the image attached above, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce the following y-intercepts:

y-intercept of f(x) = (0, 4).

y-intercept of g(x) = (0, 8).

Additionally, the end behavior of both functions f(x) and g(x) is that as x tends towards infinity, f(x) and g(x) tends towards zero:

x → ∞, f(x) → 0.

x → ∞, g(x) → 0.

Read more on y-intercept here: brainly.com/question/28351981

#SPJ1

Missing information:

The question is incomplete and the complete question is shown in the attached picture.

Taylor polynomials of degree 2 and 3 centered at x = 0 for the function f(x) = 16tan(x) are:

P2(x) = 16x + 8x^2

P3(x) = 16x + 8x^2

To find the Taylor polynomials centered at x = 0 for the function f(x) = 16tan(x), we can use the Taylor series expansion for the tangent function and truncate it to the desired degree.

The Taylor series expansion for tangent function is:

tan(x) = x + (1/3)x^3 + (2/15)x^5 + (17/315)x^7 + ...

Using this expansion, we can find the Taylor polynomials of degree 2 and 3 centered at x = 0:

Degree 2 Taylor polynomial:

P2(x) = f(0) + f'(0)(x - 0) + (1/2!)f''(0)(x - 0)^2

= 16tan(0) + 16sec^2(0)(x - 0) + (1/2!)16sec^2(0)(x - 0)^2

= 0 + 16x + 8x^2

Degree 3 Taylor polynomial:

P3(x) = P2(x) + (1/3!)f'''(0)(x - 0)^3

= 0 + 16x + 8x^2 + (1/3!)(48sec^2(0)tan(0))(x - 0)^3

= 16x + 8x^2

Therefore, the Taylor polynomials of degree 2 and 3 centered at x = 0 for the function f(x) = 16tan(x) are:

P2(x) = 16x + 8x^2

P3(x) = 16x + 8x^2

Learn more about taylor polynomials at https://brainly.com/question/31978863

#SPJ11

The linear equation of the line that passes through point (-4,-2) and has a slope of -3 is y = -3x - 14.

The formula for equation of line is expressed as;

y = mx + b

Where m is slope and b is y-intercept.

Given the data in the question;

Point ( -4, -2 )

First we calculate the y-intercept 'b' using the equation of line formula.

y = mx + b

Plug in point ( -4, -2 ) and slope -3.

-2 = -3(-4) + b

-2 = 12 + b

b = -2 - 12

b = -14

Now that we have the values of slope m and y-intercept b, plug these into y = mx + b to determine the equation of the line.

y = mx + b

y = -3(x) + ( -14 )

y = -3x - 14

Therefore, the equation of the line is y = -3x - 14.

Learn more about equation of line here: brainly.com/question/2564656

#SPJ1

Answer:

c = - 1, c = 0, c = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

c³ - 5c² - 6c = 0 ← factor out c from each term on the left side

c(c² - 5c - 6) = 0 ← factoring the quadratic

c(c - 6)(c + 1) = 0

equate each factor to zero and solve for c

c = 0

c - 6 = 0 ⇒ c = 6

c + 1 = 0 ⇒ c = - 1

9514 1404 393

Explanation:

Make use of the properties of equality.

  a = 2b +6 . . . . . given

  a = 9b -8 . . . . . given

  2b +6 = 9b -8 . . . . . . . substitution property of equality

  6 = 7b -8 . . . . . . . . . . . subtraction property of equality

  14 = 7b . . . . . . . . . . . . . addition property of equality

  2 = b . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . division property of equality

  b = 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . symmetric property of equality

The dividend in 2018 was $2.95, and it is expected to grow at a rate of 7.4% for the next five years and 2.6% thereafter. With an equity cost of capital of 8.6%, the value per share at the end of 2018 can be calculated.

To calculate the value per share at the end of 2018, we need to discount the expected future dividends using the dividend-discount model. The model assumes that the value of a stock is equal to the present value of all its expected future dividends.

First, we need to calculate the dividends for each year from 2019 to 2023. We start with the dividend in 2018, which was $2.95. We then increase it by 7.4% each year for the next five years:

Dividend in 2019 = $2.95 * (1 + 7.4%) = $3.17

Dividend in 2020 = $3.17 * (1 + 7.4%) = $3.40

Dividend in 2021 = $3.40 * (1 + 7.4%) = $3.65

Dividend in 2022 = $3.65 * (1 + 7.4%) = $3.92

Dividend in 2023 = $3.92 * (1 + 7.4%) = $4.22

After 2023, the dividend is expected to grow at a rate of 2.6% per year. To find the value per share at the end of 2018, we discount the future dividends to their present value using the equity cost of capital of 8.6%.

The present value of the dividends can be calculated as follows:

PV = (D1 / (1 + r)) + (D2 / (1 + r)^2) + ... + (Dn / (1 + r)^n)

where PV is the present value, D1 to Dn are the dividends for each year, r is the equity cost of capital, and n is the number of years.

In this case, n = 5 because we are discounting the dividends for the next five years. Let's calculate the present value:

PV = ($3.17 / (1 + 8.6%)) + ($3.40 / (1 + 8.6%)^2) + ($3.65 / (1 + 8.6%)^3) + ($3.92 / (1 + 8.6%)^4) + ($4.22 / (1 + 8.6%)^5)

PV = $3.17 / 1.086 + $3.40 / 1.086^2 + $3.65 / 1.086^3 + $3.92 / 1.086^4 + $4.22 / 1.086^5

PV ≈ $2.91 + $3.07 + $3.24 + $3.41 + $3.59

PV ≈ $16.22

Therefore, the estimated value per share of Procter and Gamble at the end of 2018 using the dividend-discount model is approximately $16.22.

Learn more about cost here: brainly.com/question/14566816

#SPJ11

The dividend in 2018 was $2.95, and it is expected to grow at a rate of 7.4% for the next five years and 2.6% thereafter. With an equity cost of capital of 8.6%, the value per share at the end of 2018 can be calculated.

To calculate the value per share at the end of 2018, we need to discount the expected future dividends using the dividend-discount model.
The model assumes that the value of a stock is equal to the present value of all its expected future dividends. First, we need to calculate the dividends for each year from 2019 to 2023. We start with the dividend in 2018, which was $2.95. We then increase it by 7.4% each year for the next five years:

Dividend in 2019 = $2.95 * (1 + 7.4%) = $3.17
Dividend in 2020 = $3.17 * (1 + 7.4%) = $3.40
Dividend in 2021 = $3.40 * (1 + 7.4%) = $3.65
Dividend in 2022 = $3.65 * (1 + 7.4%) = $3.92
Dividend in 2023 = $3.92 * (1 + 7.4%) = $4.22

After 2023, the dividend is expected to grow at a rate of 2.6% per year. To find the value per share at the end of 2018, we discount the future dividends to their present value using the equity cost of capital of 8.6%.
The present value of the dividends can be calculated as follows:
PV = (D1 / (1 + r)) + (D2 / (1 + r)^2) + ... + (Dn / (1 + r)^n) where PV is the present value, D1 to Dn are the dividends for each year, r is the equity cost of capital, and n is the number of years.

In this case, n = 5 because we are discounting the dividends for the next five years. Let's calculate the present value: PV = ($3.17 / (1 + 8.6%)) + ($3.40 / (1 + 8.6%)^2) + ($3.65 / (1 + 8.6%)^3) + ($3.92 / (1 + 8.6%)^4) + ($4.22 / (1 + 8.6%)^5)
PV = $3.17 / 1.086 + $3.40 / 1.086^2 + $3.65 / 1.086^3 + $3.92 / 1.086^4 + $4.22 / 1.086^5
PV ≈ $2.91 + $3.07 + $3.24 + $3.41 + $3.59
PV ≈ $16.22
Therefore, the estimated value per share of Procter and Gamble at the end of 2018 using the dividend-discount model is approximately $16.22.

Learn more about cost here: brainly.com/question/14566816

#SPJ11

We know that Tamika scores -8, Jim scores 8, and Brooke scores 5. Let us analyze the given scores.In the game, positive scores are considered good scores. This means that Jim's score is the highest score among all players. As Jim has scored a positive score of 8, he has scored the most in the game.

On the other hand, Tamika's score is -8, which is the lowest score among all players. As Tamika has scored a negative score of -8, she has scored the least in the game.This leaves us with Brooke's score. It is a positive number but less than Jim's score. Therefore, we can conclude that the statement "Jim scored the highest" is true.In the game, scores are written as positive or negative numbers. Tamika scores -8, Jim scores 8, and Brooke scores 5. Tamika's score is negative, and Jim's score is positive. In the game, positive scores are considered good scores. Therefore, Jim's score is the highest score among all players.On the other hand, Tamika's score is -8, which is the lowest score among all players. As Tamika has scored a negative score of -8, she has scored the least in the game. This leaves us with Brooke's score. It is a positive number but less than Jim's score. Therefore, we can conclude that the statement "Jim scored the highest" is true.

The highest score in the game is 8, and it was scored by Jim. Tamika scored the lowest, and Brooke's score is positive but less than Jim's score.

To know more about negative numbers :

brainly.com/question/258076

#SPJ11

Answer:

The scale factor is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The reason is that 12, 15, and 9 equal 4, 3, and 5 if divided by 3

The solution is,  The function is zero degree.

Function, in mathematics, an expression, rule, or law that defines a relationship between one variable (the independent variable) and another variable.

here, we have,

We have the following function:

f (x) = 2a ^ 2b + 3a ^ 3b ^ 2 + 2a ^ 2b ^ 4

We note that the function depends on x because it is f (x).

However, there is no variable x in the function.

Therefore we can assume that the function is constant, since:

a = constant

b = constant

Therefore, the degree of the function is zero

Answer:

The function is zero degree.

To learn more on function click:

https://brainly.com/question/9588575

#SPJ9

The complete question:

Given f(x)=2a^2b+3a^3b^2+2a^2b^4 what is the degree?

The probability that both randomly selected people own a dog is 0.122 or approximately 12.2%.

To calculate the probability, we can use the concept of independent events. Since 35% of people own dogs, the probability of the first person owning a dog is 0.35. Similarly, the probability of the second person owning a dog is also 0.35. Since we want both events to occur, we multiply the probabilities together: 0.35 x 0.35 = 0.122. Therefore, the probability that both randomly selected people own a dog is 0.122 or approximately 12.2%.

This means that out of all the possible combinations of two people, around 12.2% of them will consist of two dog owners. It's important to note that this calculation assumes that each person's dog ownership status is independent of the other person's. In reality, this might not always hold true, as certain factors can influence dog ownership patterns within a population. However, for the purpose of this probability calculation, we assume independence.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/32004014

#SPJ11

Answer:

inverso aditivo de +3x

Ok so wala ko kasabot nimo baah

Answer: I do not understand

Step-by-step explanation:

The F-ratio is a measure used in statistical tests, specifically in ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) to test for differences between means of multiple groups.

a) On average, what value is expected for the F-ratio if the null hypothesis is true?

The answer is a. 1. If the null hypothesis is true, it means that there is no significant difference between the means of the groups being compared. Under this assumption, the F-ratio is expected to have a value close to 1, as the variance between the groups is not significantly different from the variance within the groups.

b) On average, what value is expected for the F-ratio if the null hypothesis is false?

The answer is d. Much greater than 1.00. If the null hypothesis is false, it means that there is a significant difference between the means of the groups being compared. Under this assumption, the F-ratio is expected to have a value much greater than 1, as the variance between the groups is significantly larger than the variance within the groups.

To learn more about F-ratio,

https://brainly.com/question/27310923

#SPJ4

Answer:

28.5

Step-by-step explanation:

7 times 18

plus 45

divided by 6(2x3)

if n decreases then the value of level of significance of each samples \(\alpha\) decreases

1. Critical Value: The value of the statistic for which the test just rejects the null hypothesis at the given significance level.

2. Power of the Test: The probability that the test correctly rejects the null hypothesis when the alternative is true.

3. Significance Level: The prescribed rejection probability of a statistical hypothesis test when the null hypothesis is true.

4. Size of the test: The probability that the test incorrectly rejects the null hypothesis when it is true.

if n decreases then the value of level of significance of each samples \(\alpha\) decreases and hence 1- \(\alpha\) increases which are called the rejection of test sample increases

learn more about of probability here

https://brainly.com/question/16159503

#SPJ4

Answer:

I think 7

Step-by-step explanation:

By the way I'm a swimmer, and even I could swim 3 laps under 12 minutes. This poor girl is slow...

Upon answering the query  As a result, the following is the system of equations' solution: x = -150, y = 120.

An equation in math is an expression that connects two claims and uses the equals symbol (=) to denote equivalence. An equation in algebra is a mathematical statement that establishes the equivalence of two mathematical expressions. For instance, in the equation 3x + 5 = 14, the equal sign places a space between each of the variables 3x + 5 and 14. The relationship between the two sentences that are written on each side of a letter may be understood using a mathematical formula. The sign and only one variable are frequently the same. as in, 2x - 4 equals 2, for instance.

To solve

\(Y/4 - x/5 = 6 ........ (1)\\x/15 + y/12 = 0 ....... (2)\\\)

After using the substitution approach to find the value for one of the variables, we can use that value to find the value for the other variable.

We can solve for x in terms of y using equation (2):

\(x = - (5/4) y ........ (3)\)

Equation (1) may now be changed to an equation in terms of y by substituting equation (3) for equation (1):

\(y/4 - (-5/4)y/5 = 6\\5y - 4y = 120\\y = 120\\x = - (5/4) (120) = -150\\\)

As a result, the following is the system of equations' solution:

x = -150, y = 120.

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/649785

#SPJ1

For the first sample {2.038 2.054 2.053 2.055 2.059 2.059 2.009 2.042 2.053 2.047}, the process is still "in order," while for the second sample {2.022 1.997 2.044 2.044 2.032 2.045 2.045 2.047 2.030 2.044}, the process might be "out of order."

To determine whether the process is still "in order" or "out of order," we can compare the current sample of output to the known mean and standard deviation of the process.

For the first sample {2.038 2.054 2.053 2.055 2.059 2.059 2.009 2.042 2.053 2.047}:

Calculate the sample mean by summing up all the values in the sample and dividing by the number of values (n = 10):

Sample mean = (2.038 + 2.054 + 2.053 + 2.055 + 2.059 + 2.059 + 2.009 + 2.042 + 2.053 + 2.047) / 10 = 2.048.

Compare the sample mean to the known process mean (2.050):

The sample mean (2.048) is very close to the process mean (2.050), indicating that the process is still "in order."

Calculate the sample standard deviation using the formula:

Sample standard deviation = sqrt(sum((x - mean)^2) / (n - 1))

Using the formula with the sample values, we find the sample standard deviation to be approximately 0.019 liters.

Compare the sample standard deviation to the known process standard deviation (0.020):

The sample standard deviation (0.019) is very close to the process standard deviation (0.020), further supporting that the process is still "in order."

For the second sample {2.022 1.997 2.044 2.044 2.032 2.045 2.045 2.047 2.030 2.044}:

Calculate the sample mean:

Sample mean = (2.022 + 1.997 + 2.044 + 2.044 + 2.032 + 2.045 + 2.045 + 2.047 + 2.030 + 2.044) / 10 ≈ 2.034

Compare the sample mean to the process mean (2.050):

The sample mean (2.034) is noticeably different from the process mean (2.050), indicating that the process might be "out of order."

Calculate the sample standard deviation:

The sample standard deviation is approximately 0.019 liters.

Compare the sample standard deviation to the process standard deviation (0.020):

The sample standard deviation (0.019) is similar to the process standard deviation (0.020), suggesting that the process is still "in order" in terms of variation.

In summary, for the first sample, the process is still "in order" as both the sample mean and sample standard deviation are close to the known process values.

However, for the second sample, the difference in the sample mean suggests that the process might be "out of order," even though the sample standard deviation remains within an acceptable range.

For similar question on standard deviation.

https://brainly.com/question/12402189  

#SPJ8

Part A

If the number is n, then the expression is 7n+6.

Part B

Three times the sum of a number and 8.