Explain why 10 x 2 is equivalent to 10 ÷ 1/2.

The radical notation of the given expression is \(\sqrt[5]{31}\).

The given expression is \(31^\frac{1}{5}\).

Radical form is the expression that involves radical signs such as square root, cube root, etc instead of using exponents to describe the same entity.

The radical notation is \(\sqrt[5]{31}\)

Therefore, the radical notation of the given expression is \(\sqrt[5]{31}\).

Learn more about the radical form here:

brainly.com/question/27272065.

#SPJ1

==============================================

Reason:

It might help to draw a number line for this.

3/18 is closer to 0 than it is to 1/2 = 9/18, so the mixed number 3 & 3/18 rounds to 3 when rounding to the nearest half.

4/7 is closer to 1/2 = 4/8 than it is to either 0 or 1, so 4 & 4/7 rounds to 4 & 1/2 when rounding to the nearest half.

Adding 3 to 4 & 1/2 gets 7 & 1/2 since we add the whole parts 3+4 = 7, and the fractional part stays as it is.

-----------

Check:

(3 + 3/18) + (4 + 4/7) = 7.738 approximately

7 + 1/2 = 7.5 exactly

The two results aren't too far off. The estimate of 7 & 1/2 is an underestimate.

Answer:

About 7 1/2 ounces

Step-by-step explanation:

Add your whole numbers first, 3 + 4 = 7

Now the fractions:

3/18 = 1/6

Estimate 4/7 + 1/6, the answer is somewhere between 1/2 and 1 whole. Therefore the answer is about 7 1/2

Check:

3/18 × 7/7 = 21/126

4/7 × 18/18 = 72/126

21/126 + 72/126 = 93/126

The actual answer is 7 31/42, so the closest answer is 7 1/2

Answer:

. bd s solicitarlo

Step-by-step explanation:

.

supuestamente

The selection depends on individual needs, preferences, and the intended use of the tiny house.

a) To find the amount of space inside each house, we need to calculate the volume for each design.

House on the left:

Volume = length x width x height = 2.5 m x 18 m x 2.8 m = 126 m³

Triangular house:

Volume of a triangular prism = (base area x height) / 2

Base area = (1/2) x base x height = (1/2) x 4 m x 10 m = 20 m²

Volume = (20 m² x 7 m) / 2 = 70 m³

b) When comparing the environmental impacts of each house, several factors need to be considered:

Positive impacts:

1. Material usage: Tiny houses use fewer materials, reducing resource consumption and waste generation.

2. Energy efficiency: Smaller living spaces require less energy for heating, cooling, and lighting, leading to lower energy consumption.

3. Land utilization: Tiny houses can be built on smaller plots of land, preserving green spaces and reducing urban sprawl.

Negative impacts:

1. Construction materials: Although tiny houses use less material overall, the environmental impact depends on the types of materials used. Sustainable and eco-friendly materials should be prioritized.

2. Water and waste management: Adequate provisions for water supply and waste disposal should be implemented to minimize environmental impacts.

3. Transportation: The transportation of tiny houses to their locations can contribute to carbon emissions if not done efficiently.

c) The choice of design for a tiny house depends on personal preferences and priorities. However, considering the provided information:

The house on the left offers a larger interior space of 126 m³, providing more room for living and storage. It may be suitable for individuals or couples who desire more space and functionality within their tiny house.

The triangular house has a smaller interior volume of 70 m³ but offers a unique design and aesthetic appeal. It may be preferred by individuals who prioritize a distinctive architectural style or who are looking for a minimalist and cozy living space.

Ultimately, the selection depends on individual needs, preferences, and the intended use of the tiny house. Factors such as lifestyle, desired amenities, and personal values regarding sustainability and resource conservation should be considered when making the final decision.

for more such question on intended visit

https://brainly.com/question/31252264

#SPJ8

Answer:

f(x) = 4(x+3)(x-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

The quadratic function is

f(x) = a(x-b1)(x-b2)  where a is a coefficient and b1 and b2 are the zeros

f(x) = a(x- -3)(x-2)

f(x) = a(x+3)(x-2)

The leading coefficient is a and we know a =4

f(x) = 4(x+3)(x-2)

Answer:

The answer is 50.2 m

Step-by-step explanation:

Given a=34 and b=37,

c = 50.24938

∠α = 42.58° = 42°34'50" = 0.74317 rad

∠β = 47.42° = 47°25'10" = 0.82763 rad

h = 25.03514

area = 629

perimeter = 121.24938

inradius = 10.37531

circumradius = 25.12469

The number of combinations of 6 boys and 20 girls that can exist among 26 children born in a hospital on a given day is 230,230.

]To calculate the number of combinations, we can use the concept of binomial coefficients. The formula for calculating the number of combinations is C(n, k) = n! / (k!(n-k)!), where n is the total number of objects and k is the number of objects we want to select.

In this case, we have 26 children in total, and we want to select 6 boys and 20 girls. Plugging these values into the formula, we get C(26, 6) = 26! / (6!(26-6)!) = 230,230. Therefore, there are 230,230 different combinations of 6 boys and 20 girls that can exist among the 26 children born in the hospital on that given day.

Learn more about combinations here : brainly.com/question/28065038

#SPJ11

Answer:

5 ratio 4 is

35 ratio 28

they both multiply by 7.....

Answer:

\(\large \boxed{x=28}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

\(5:4=35:x\)

Ratios can be expressed as fractions.

\(5/4=35/x\)

Cross multiply.

\(5 \times x = 4 \times 35\)

\(5x=140\)

Divide both sides by 5.

\((5x)/5=140/5\)

\(x=28\)

Answer:

h = 4 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

See attached image.

For the first sample {2.038 2.054 2.053 2.055 2.059 2.059 2.009 2.042 2.053 2.047}, the process is still "in order," while for the second sample {2.022 1.997 2.044 2.044 2.032 2.045 2.045 2.047 2.030 2.044}, the process might be "out of order."

To determine whether the process is still "in order" or "out of order," we can compare the current sample of output to the known mean and standard deviation of the process.

For the first sample {2.038 2.054 2.053 2.055 2.059 2.059 2.009 2.042 2.053 2.047}:

Calculate the sample mean by summing up all the values in the sample and dividing by the number of values (n = 10):

Sample mean = (2.038 + 2.054 + 2.053 + 2.055 + 2.059 + 2.059 + 2.009 + 2.042 + 2.053 + 2.047) / 10 = 2.048.

Compare the sample mean to the known process mean (2.050):

The sample mean (2.048) is very close to the process mean (2.050), indicating that the process is still "in order."

Calculate the sample standard deviation using the formula:

Sample standard deviation = sqrt(sum((x - mean)^2) / (n - 1))

Using the formula with the sample values, we find the sample standard deviation to be approximately 0.019 liters.

Compare the sample standard deviation to the known process standard deviation (0.020):

The sample standard deviation (0.019) is very close to the process standard deviation (0.020), further supporting that the process is still "in order."

For the second sample {2.022 1.997 2.044 2.044 2.032 2.045 2.045 2.047 2.030 2.044}:

Calculate the sample mean:

Sample mean = (2.022 + 1.997 + 2.044 + 2.044 + 2.032 + 2.045 + 2.045 + 2.047 + 2.030 + 2.044) / 10 ≈ 2.034

Compare the sample mean to the process mean (2.050):

The sample mean (2.034) is noticeably different from the process mean (2.050), indicating that the process might be "out of order."

Calculate the sample standard deviation:

The sample standard deviation is approximately 0.019 liters.

Compare the sample standard deviation to the process standard deviation (0.020):

The sample standard deviation (0.019) is similar to the process standard deviation (0.020), suggesting that the process is still "in order" in terms of variation.

In summary, for the first sample, the process is still "in order" as both the sample mean and sample standard deviation are close to the known process values.

However, for the second sample, the difference in the sample mean suggests that the process might be "out of order," even though the sample standard deviation remains within an acceptable range.

For similar question on standard deviation.

https://brainly.com/question/12402189  

#SPJ8

The numerator of the z-score test statistic measures the difference between the sample mean and the population mean (or the hypothesized population mean, depending on the context) in terms of the standard error of the mean.

It can use z- test only if the population standard deviation is known (or given) and the sample is large (more than 30 units)

If the mean and standard deviation is known, then the z-score is calculated using the formula.

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is data;

μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation.

Thus, the actual distance between a sample mean x and a population mean µ is measured by the numerator of z- score test statistic.

To know more about hypothesis here

https://brainly.com/question/29996729

#SPJ4

Answer: a) p decreases and b) v decreases

Step-by-step explanation: For a), you can test whether p increases or decreases based on the position of v. If v=1 then p=4/1=4 but that p number will change as v also changes. You can try other similar numbers for v like 2 and 3 and you can see that p gets fractions that continuously get smaller. This is a direct relationship in proportion so p decreases and v increases.

For b), use the same logic as a). You can ask yourself, "If p is increasing, what do I already know about the relationship from problem A?" Now we know that as v rises in value, p gets smaller, so the opposite must be true here. As P gets larger, v must get smaller and decrease in value.

The statement that states the difference between the population parameters between two groups is zero is referred to as the null hypothesis. Therefore, the correct answer is option b: null hypothesis.

In statistical hypothesis testing, we compare the observed data from two groups or samples to determine if there is evidence to support a difference or relationship between the populations they represent. The null hypothesis (option b) is a statement that assumes there is no difference or relationship between the population parameters being compared.

The null hypothesis is typically denoted as H0 and is the default position that we aim to test against. It asserts that any observed differences or relationships are due to chance or random variation.

On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis (option c) states that there is a difference or relationship between the population parameters. The null hypothesis is formulated as the opposite of the alternative hypothesis, assuming no difference or relationship.

Therefore, the correct answer is option b: null hypothesis.

Learn more about statistical hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/29576929

#SPJ11

=====================================================

Explanation:

The triangular face has area of base*height/2 = 4*10/2 = 40/2 = 20 square cm.

Multiply this prism base area by the depth of the prism to get 20*2 = 40 cubic cm.

It might help to place the triangular prism so the triangular face is along the ground, so you can think of that face as the floor of this triangular room. The volume of this room is equal to the floor area times the height of the room.

volume of the room = (floor area)*(height of the room)

volume of the prism = (base area)*(height of the prism)

For any prism, the base faces are always parallel and congruent to each other.

y_y+z=

9_9+86+2=

0+86+2=

86+2=88

Answer:

18 mph.-

Step-by-step explanation:

This is 2*54 / 6

= 18 m p h.

Answer:

V= π r² h

Step-by-step explanation:

The error in the distance if the uppermost portion of a 3. 0m long stadia rod is inclined 14 cm toward the observer and the rod intercept is 1. 75m on a horizontal sight is 8.167cm.

The tangent or tanθ in a right angle triangle is the ratio of its perpendicular to its base. it is given as,

Tan(θ) = Perpendicular/Base

where,

θ is the angle,

Perpendicular is the side of the triangle opposite to the angle θ,

The base is the adjacent smaller side of the angle θ.

Given the uppermost portion of a that is 3.0m long stadia rod is inclined 14 cm toward the observer, therefore, the angle of inclination, θ can be written as

tan(θ)=0.14/3

θ = 2.672°

Also, the rod intercept is 1.75m, therefore, t the error in distance in the distance is,

tanθ=x/1.75

x = 1.75 tan(θ)

x = 1.75 × tan(2.672°)

x = 0.08167 m = 8.167 cm

Hence, the error in the distance if the uppermost portion of a 3. 0m long stadia rod is inclined 14 cm toward the observer and the rod intercept is 1. 75m on a horizontal sight is 8.167cm.

Learn more about Tangent (Tanθ):

https://brainly.com/question/10623976

#SPJ4

Answer:

1. coefficient

3. term

6. variable

7. Expression

Thus, Tony runs at a speed of 13 feet per second, Zach runs at a speed of 12.87 feet per second, Ron runs at a speed of 10 feet per second, and Liz runs at a speed of 9.95 feet per second.

Tony runs at a speed of 13 feet per second, which means he covers a distance of 13 feet in one second.

Zach, on the other hand, runs 296 feet in 23 seconds, so we need to calculate his speed. To do that, we divide the distance by the time, which gives us 12.87 feet per second.

Ron runs one mile in 527 seconds, which is equivalent to 5,280 feet. Therefore, his speed is 10 feet per second, which is the same as running at a pace of 6 minutes per mile. Finally, Liz runs 597 feet in one minute, so her speed is 9.95 feet per second.

In summary, Tony runs at a speed of 13 feet per second, Zach runs at a speed of 12.87 feet per second, Ron runs at a speed of 10 feet per second, and Liz runs at a speed of 9.95 feet per second.

It's important to note that the distances and times given in these examples are specific to each person and may vary depending on the circumstances.

However, by calculating their speeds, we can compare their performances and determine who is running faster or slower than the others.

Know more about the speed

https://brainly.com/question/26862717

#SPJ11

Main Answer:The equations :xcosx - 2x^2 + 3x - 1 = 0 on [1.2, 1.3]

x - (lnx)^x = 0 over [4, 5] have at least one solution on the given interval.

Supporting Question and Answer:

What is the Intermediate Value Theorem?

The Intermediate Value Theorem states that if a function is continuous on a closed interval and takes on values of opposite signs at the endpoints of the interval, then it must have at least one root (or solution) within that interval.

Body of the Solution:To show that the equations have at least one solution on the given intervals, we can use the Intermediate Value Theorem. According to the theorem, if a function is continuous on a closed interval and takes on values of opposite signs at the endpoints of the interval, then it must have at least one root within that interval.

Let's analyze each equation separately:

xcosx - 2x^2 + 3x - 1 = 0 on [1.2, 1.3]

To apply the Intermediate Value Theorem, we need to show that the function is continuous on the interval and takes on values of opposite signs at the endpoints.

First, let's check the continuity of the function. Both xcosx and -2x^2 + 3x - 1 are continuous functions on their respective domains. Thus, their sum, xcosx - 2x^2 + 3x - 1, is also continuous on the interval [1.2, 1.3].

Next, we evaluate the function at the endpoints:

f(1.2) = (1.2)cos(1.2) - 2(1.2)^2 + 3(1.2) - 1

≈ 0.0317

f(1.3) = (1.3)cos(1.3) - 2(1.3)^2 + 3(1.3) - 1

≈ -0.0735

Since f(1.2) is positive and f(1.3) is negative, the function changes sign within the interval [1.2, 1.3]. Therefore, by the Intermediate Value Theorem, the equation xcosx - 2x^2 + 3x - 1 = 0 has at least one solution within the interval [1.2, 1.3].

x - (lnx)^x = 0 over [4, 5]

Again, we need to verify the continuity of the function and the sign change at the endpoints.

The function x - (lnx)^x is continuous on the interval [4, 5], as both x and lnx are continuous functions on their respective domains.

Evaluating the function at the endpoints:

f(4) = 4 - (ln4)^4

≈ -3.9616

f(5) = 5 - (ln5)^5

≈ 3.0342

Since f(4) is negative and f(5) is positive, the function changes sign within the interval [4, 5]. By the Intermediate Value Theorem, the equation x - (lnx)^x = 0 has at least one solution within the interval [4, 5].

Final Answer:In both cases, we have shown that the equations have at least one solution within the given intervals using the Intermediate Value Theorem.

To learn more about the Intermediate Value Theorem  from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/30557318

#SPJ4

The equations :xcosx - 2x²  + 3x - 1 = 0 on [1.2, 1.3]

x - (lnx)^x = 0 over [4, 5] have at least one solution on the given interval.

The Intermediate Value Theorem states that if a function is continuous on a closed interval and takes on values of opposite signs at the endpoints of the interval, then it must have at least one root (or solution) within that interval.

To show that the equations have at least one solution on the given intervals, we can use the Intermediate Value Theorem. According to the theorem, if a function is continuous on a closed interval and takes on values of opposite signs at the endpoints of the interval, then it must have at least one root within that interval.

Let's analyze each equation separately:

xcosx - 2x²  + 3x - 1 = 0 on [1.2, 1.3]

To apply the Intermediate Value Theorem, we need to show that the function is continuous on the interval and takes on values of opposite signs at the endpoints.

First, let's check the continuity of the function. Both xcosx and -2x²  + 3x - 1 are continuous functions on their respective domains. Thus, their sum, xcosx - 2x²  + 3x - 1, is also continuous on the interval [1.2, 1.3].

Next, we evaluate the function at the endpoints:

f(1.2) = (1.2)cos(1.2) - 2(1.2)²  + 3(1.2) - 1

≈ 0.0317

f(1.3) = (1.3)cos(1.3) - 2(1.3)²  + 3(1.3) - 1

≈ -0.0735

Since f(1.2) is positive and f(1.3) is negative, the function changes sign within the interval [1.2, 1.3]. Therefore, by the Intermediate Value Theorem, the equation xcosx - 2x² + 3x - 1 = 0 has at least one solution within the interval [1.2, 1.3].

x - (lnx)ˣ = 0 over [4, 5]

Again, we need to verify the continuity of the function and the sign change at the endpoints.

The function x - (lnx)ˣ is continuous on the interval [4, 5], as both x and lnx are continuous functions on their respective domains.

Evaluating the function at the endpoints:

f(4) = 4 - (ln4)⁴

≈ -3.9616

f(5) = 5 - (ln5)⁵

≈ 3.0342

Since f(4) is negative and f(5) is positive, the function changes sign within the interval [4, 5]. By the Intermediate Value Theorem, the equation x - (lnx)^x = 0 has at least one solution within the interval [4, 5].

In both cases, we have shown that the equations have at least one solution within the given intervals using the Intermediate Value Theorem.

To learn more about the Intermediate Value Theorem

brainly.com/question/30557318

#SPJ4

Answer:

210 gallons

Step-by-step explanation:

120 x 1 = 120

120 / 4 = 30 x 3 = 90

120 + 90 = 210

A graph may be used to locate the horizontal asymptote.

Horizontal asymptotes are shown by horizontal dashed lines, as implied by their name. These represent the values that the function approaches as  is significantly large or small.

Methods for Locating Horizontal Asymptotes

To keep in mind that an asymptote is a line that a function's graph approaches but never crosses. A Rational function in the example below has asymptotes.

There is a vertical asymptote at x = 3 and a horizontal asymptote at y = 1 in the depicted graph. The asymptotes are approached but never actually reached by the curves.

Depending on how the degrees of the polynomial in the function's numerator and denominator are compared, a different approach is taken to find the horizontal asymptote. To locate the horizontal asymptotes, keep in mind the following:

To know more about Horizontal asymptote from the given link.

brainly.com/question/4138300

#SPJ4

Step-by-step explanation:

the second option 1/(125n¹²)

why ?

when we have the exponent of an exponent, we can multiply the exponents.

so, 4×-3 = -12

a negative exponent means 1/... (with the corresponding positive exponent in the denominator).

and an exponent of the multiplication of factors means that the exponent is to be used for every factor in the multiplication.

so, the exponent -3 has to be applied to 5 and to n⁴.

this gives us 5^‐3 and n^-12 as factors.

the result is 1/(5³) × 1/(n¹²).

and that is the mentioned result above.

Answer:

2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Hey!

All the Prime numbers under 30 are...

2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29

Step-by-step explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS!!

Answer: x = -10

Isolate the variable by dividing each side by factors that don't contain the variable.

Answer:

x= -10

Step-by-step explanation:

7x-4(-4x-16)=-166 foil the ()

7x+16x+64= -166  combine terms

23x+64= -166  subtract 64 to both sides

23x= -230  divide by 23

x= -10

The probability of selecting exactly three clubs from a standard deck is 0.088. Where n = 5; p = 0.25; q = 0.75; and x = 3 . It is calculated by using binomial probability.

The binomial probability formula is

P(X = x) = ⁿCₓ pˣ q⁽ⁿ⁻ˣ⁾ = \(\frac{n!}{(n-x)!x!} p^xq^{(n-x)}\)

Where n is the number of trials, p i is the probability of success, and q is the probability of failure.

And q = 1 - p

It is given that, a card is selected from a standard deck and replaced.

This experiment has repeated a total of five times. i.e., trials n = 5

So, the probability of success is p = 1/4 = 0.25

(Since one card is to be selected from the five trials where each time the card is replaced)

Then, the probability of failure is q = 1 - 0.25 = 0.75

And it is given that we need to find the probability of selecting exactly three clubs. So, the required random variable is x = 3.

Then, using the binomial probability formula, we get

P(X = x) = ⁿCₓ pˣ q⁽ⁿ⁻ˣ⁾

⇒ P(X = 3) = ⁵C₃ p³q⁽⁵⁻³⁾ = ⁵C₃(0.25)³(0.75)² = 0.0878

On rounding off, we get the required probability as 0.088.

Learn more about the binomial probability of random variables here:

https://brainly.com/question/15246027

#SPJ1

The triangles ∆BCD is congruent to ∆CBE and they are similar triangles

a) BC ≅ BC

b) BE ≅ CD

c) ∠DBC ≅ ∠ECB

If two triangles' corresponding angles are congruent and their corresponding sides are proportional, they are said to be similar triangles. In other words, similar triangles have the same shape but may or may not be the same size. The triangles are congruent if their corresponding sides are also of identical length.

Corresponding sides of similar triangles are in the same ratio. The ratio of area of similar triangles is the same as the ratio of the square of any pair of their corresponding sides

Given data ,

Let the first triangle be represented as ∆BCD

Let the second triangle be represented as ∆CBE

The triangles ∆BCD and ∆CBE are similar

So , corresponding sides of similar triangles are in the same ratio

And , the corresponding angles is also congruent

Substituting the values in the equation , we get

The measure of side BC ≅ measure of side BC

The measure of side BE ≅ measure of side CD

The measure of ∠DBC ≅ the measure of ∠ECB

Hence , they are similar triangles

To learn more about similar triangles click :

https://brainly.com/question/29378183

#SPJ1

Julie's claim that her sunflower will be 300 inches tall after just 3 months is not reasonable.

Sunflowers typically have a growth cycle that spans several months, and their growth rate varies depending on various factors such as sunlight, soil quality, water availability, and genetics. While sunflowers can grow quite tall, reaching heights of 10-15 feet or more, it usually takes them a significant amount of time to achieve such heights.

It is highly unlikely for a sunflower to grow to a height of 300 inches (25 feet) in just 3 months. Such rapid growth would be extraordinarily uncommon and would require exceptional conditions, which are typically not achievable in a regular home garden or natural environment.

Furthermore, the average growth rate of a sunflower is around 2-3 inches per week under optimal conditions. Considering this rate, even with ideal circumstances, it would take approximately 3 to 4 months for a sunflower to grow to a height of 300 inches.

In conclusion, Julie's claim is not reasonable as it goes against the typical growth pattern and rate of sunflowers. The claim of achieving a height of 300 inches in just 3 months is highly improbable and would require extraordinary circumstances.

To learn more on equation, refer here:

brainly.com/question/29396079

#SPJ11