For this project, let's create a scenario where the crime committed is burglary. The necessary elements of this crime include intent, the act of breaking and entering, and the maliciousness of stealing someone else's property.
The scene leading to the suspect's arrest:
A homeowner reported to the police that their home was burglarized. The police arrived at the scene and noticed that the front door was forced open. The police searched the home and found fingerprints on the window sill and footprints leading to the suspect's house. The police obtained a warrant to search the suspect's home and found stolen items matching the description of the stolen items from the victim's home.
Post-arrest scenario:
The suspect was read their Miranda rights and questioned without an attorney present. The suspect admitted to the burglary. The police conducted a line-up and the victim positively identified the suspect as the person who burglarized their home. The suspect was arraigned and pleaded guilty to the crime of burglary.
Sentence:
The suspect was sentenced to six months in jail and ordered to pay restitution to the victim. This sentence was arrived at because the suspect had a previous criminal record and showed no remorse for their actions.
Trial and appeal:
The case did not proceed to trial as the suspect pleaded guilty to the crime. The defendant did not file an appeal.
Lawsuit:
The victim did file a lawsuit against the defendant and was awarded the cost of the stolen items plus damages. The verdict was upheld on appeal.
Learn more about burglary:
https://brainly.com/question/7943264.
#SPJ11
Is there sex trafficking in Iowa
Answer:
30, 2020. From 2013 to 2017, the number of human trafficking reports in Iowa increased steadily, according to a report from the Iowa Office to Combat Human Trafficking. Reports decreased in 2018, increased in 2019, then fell off again in 2020.
Hope its helpful!
Answer:
30, 2020. From 2013 to 2017, the number of human trafficking reports in Iowa increased steadily, according to a report from the Iowa Office to Combat Human Trafficking. Reports decreased in 2018, increased in 2019, then fell off again in 2020.
Hope its helpful!
A choice-of-law clause specifies which law will govern in case of a dispute between two organizations or companies. true or false?
The given statement is True. A choice-of-law clause specifies which law will govern in case of a dispute between two organizations or companies.
What do you mean by choice-of-law ?
Choice-of-law is the term used to describe the law chosen by parties involved in a legal dispute to govern their contractual obligations and/or resolve their legal disputes. It is also referred to as the conflict of laws, and it is the process of determining which jurisdiction’s law applies to a particular legal dispute. This can be determined through choice of law clauses, which are commonly included in international contracts, or through the application of lex loci, which is a legal principle that the law of the place where the contract is executed or the dispute arises will be applied. Choice-of-law plays an important role in international business transactions, as it can help to ensure that the obligations of the parties are enforced in a manner consistent with the laws of the jurisdiction chosen.
This clause is often included in contracts to ensure that any disputes are governed by the law of the state that is most beneficial to the parties involved.
To learn more about Choice-of-law:
https://brainly.com/question/1387188
#SPJ1
Antonio is walking home late from school after football practice. He hears someone running behind him and turns, thinking it might be a teammate catching up. But it is definitely not a friend. Whoever it is hits Antonio on the head with something heavy. The blow knocks Antonio to the ground. The attacker grabs Antonio’s phone and demands his wallet. Head spinning, Antonio hands it over, and the assailant runs off. Antonio gets to his feet, dizzy. His teammate, Javier, runs forward to help. “Did you see the person who attacked you? I was too far away to tell who it was.” “I got a good look at his face,” Antonio replies, “but it wasn’t someone I know.” “He was really tall and wearing a dark hoodie,” Javier says. “Maybe that will help.” If you were the police officer working with Antonino and Javier, how would you help them remember what they saw and identify a suspect? After you write your initial response, read through those of your peers and see if you can come up with other suggestions or ideas for how to improve their answers.
Answer:
How did they look, try to remember what color skin what type of hair ?
One strategy to help Antonino and Javier recall what they saw and identify a suspect, if one were the police officer working with them to investigate the incident, is to calm them down and collect the information they can remember slowly.
Additionally, I would hire a sketch artist to help me compile the data into an investigation sketch. We can create an approximation of the suspect's appearance using these.
An illustration drawing shows a crime scene and any items there that are important to the investigation. The investigator can better recall details of the scene by sketching it. Due to the fact that even judges can understand them, they are incredibly simple to present in court. Criminal investigations can employ drawings.
Learn more about criminal investigations here:
https://brainly.com/question/34097558
#SPJ3
What's your opinion of the probate process?
(it has to 2 sentences)
WILL GIVE BRAINLEYEST
Answer:
Explanation:
My opinion about the probate process is that it is beneficial even though it can be a long and tiring process. An official process ensures that everything happens fairly before the law which the probate process fulfills because, without an official process, the dealing of the deceased will get more complicated and murkier without the law stepping in.
Answer:
Explanation:
The probate process is too long and complex. It adds stresses and extra work for grieving family members. The probate process can be avoided by proper estate planning such as setting up a will or living trust.
The above is my non-lawyer option of the probate process.
Emoluments are mentioned in the Constitution and are payments with the
potential to corrupt the President.
Answer:
ayaw mo pag salig sa brainly
How many calendar days does a new employee have to complete the RBS training program
Any on-premise alcohol server and manager must be certified by an accredited RBS training provider and pass an ABC exam within 60 calendar days from the first date of employment. The RBS exam is currently available in English, Spanish, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Hindi, and Punjabi.
Which of the following national holidays does not occur in the winter?
Many national holidays do not occur in the winter in the United States. One national holiday that does not occur in winter is "Memorial Day, which falls between May 25–31."
Other national holidays that do not occur in winter in the United States include the following:
Juneteenth National Independence Day on June 19th;Independence Day on July 4th;Labor Day on September 1 to 7th;Columbus Day, on October 8th to 14th;Veterans Day on November 11th;Thanks Giving Day on November 22 - 24;This is based on the fact that Winter occurs in the United States between December 21s to March 20th.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that various national holidays do not fall within the winter period.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/16406621
People can propose and enact state laws by gathering signatures on a petition through:
A. a referendum.
B. an initiative.
C. a recall.
D. a ballot.
People can propose and enact state laws by gathering signatures on a petition through B. an initiative.
What is an initiative ?An initiative is a process in which a proposed law or constitutional amendment is put on the ballot and submitted directly to the voters for approval or rejection.
The process begins with the submission of a petition to the relevant government body, typically the state's secretary of state. The petition must contain a certain number of signatures from registered voters, as required by state law.
Once the petition is certified, the proposed law is placed on the ballot for the next general election or a special election called specifically for that purpose.
Find out more on initiatives at https://brainly.com/question/28969119
#SPJ1
An insured receives an annual life insurance dividend check. What term best describes this arrangement?
The term that best describes the arrangement where an insured receives an annual life insurance dividend check is "participating life insurance."
What is participating life insurance ?Participating life insurance is a type of permanent life insurance policy that allows policyholders to receive a share of the insurance company's profits in the form of annual dividend payments. These dividends are not guaranteed, but are based on the company's financial performance and the policyholder's share of ownership in the company's surplus.
Policyholders who own participating life insurance policies are considered "participating policyholders," and are entitled to vote on certain company matters, such as the election of the board of directors.
Find out more on participating life insurance at https://brainly.com/question/15508888
#SPJ1
Shakila’s husband, David, had vomited after having dinner at a local restaurant. Shakila then brought him to Hospital Suredie for treatment. It was 1.00 a.m. in the morning and there was no doctor on duty. The assistant nurse on duty had called Dr. Quack Nicholson, who was the doctor in charge, for instructions. Dr. Quack instructed the nurse to tell the patient to go home and consult his own personal physician in the morning. Shakila’s husband died later the next day. The cause of death was diagnosed as a chronic disease and he would have died anyway, even if Dr. Quack had treated him.
Advise Shakila whether she can successfully sue Hospital Suredie and Dr Quack for negligence.
Answer:
Explanation:
It is difficult to say whether Shakila can successfully sue Hospital Suredie and Dr. Quack for negligence without more information about the specific circumstances of the case and the laws in the jurisdiction in which the incident occurred.
In general, for a negligence case to be successful, it must be proven that the defendants had a duty of care to the patient, that this duty of care was breached, and that this breach caused harm to the patient.
In this case, it could be argued that the hospital and Dr. Quack had a duty of care to David as a patient seeking medical treatment. However, it is also stated that there was no doctor on duty and the cause of death was diagnosed as a chronic disease and he would have died anyway, even if Dr. Quack had treated him. This information suggests that the death may not have been preventable and that there may not have been a breach of the duty of care.
It would be advisable for Shakila to consult with a lawyer experienced in medical malpractice cases to determine the specific laws and regulations that may apply in her case and to evaluate the strength of her potential legal claim.
Analisis "Preciosidad" de clarice lispector por favor alguien urgente
Is the president pro tempore of the Senate the highest position in the Senate?
No, the president pro tempore of the Senate the highest position in the Senate.
No, the president pro tempore of the Senate is not the highest position in the Senate. The highest position in the Senate is the Vice President of the United States, who is also the President of the Senate. The president pro tempore is the highest-ranking member of the Senate who is not an officer of the federal government, but is instead a member of the Senate who has been elected by his or her peers to serve as a temporary or acting president of the Senate. The president pro tempore is responsible for presiding over the Senate in the absence of the Vice President and is third in the presidential line of succession, The Vice President and the Speaker of the House of Representatives are right behind them.
To know more about president please refer: https://brainly.com/question/11616771
#SPJ4
Which of the following would most likely be considered a violation of the Fourth Amendment?
OA.
Confiscating the cellphone of a student who made a bomb threat
OB.
Searching the lockers of all students with black hair
O c. Stopping a vehicle believed to be involved in a bank robbery
OD
Stopping and searching all cars at the US-Mexico border
Answer:
OB
Explanation:
There is no reason to confiscate them but people in all other options could be doing something, have done, or they are currently doing it. Everything but OB is reasonable.
Assuming a taxpayer does not exceed any income limitations that reduce or eliminate any of the following items, which of the following is not deductible by an individual taxpayer?
โข A. A $3,000 contribution to a Roth IRA by a 58 year old taxpayer.
[80%]
โข B. A penalty resulting from premature withdrawal of funds from a
certificate of deposit (CD). [12%]
โข C. Fees received for jury duty that are remitted to the taxpayer's
employer. [5%]
โข D. Tuition for courses taken by a self-employed insurance agent
that are required to maintain licensure in the taxpayer's state
of residence. [3%]
Assuming a taxpayer does not exceed any income limitations that reduce or eliminate any of the following items, the item that is not deductible by an individual taxpayer is: A $3,000 contribution to a Roth IRA by a 58-year-old taxpayer. The correct option is A.
A. Roth IRA contributions are not deductible because they are made with after-tax dollars. Therefore, they do not reduce the taxpayer's taxable income.
B. A penalty resulting from premature withdrawal of funds from a certificate of deposit (CD) is deductible as it is considered an adjustment to income, reducing the taxpayer's taxable income.
C. Fees received for jury duty that are remitted to the taxpayer's employer are deductible as an adjustment to income, lowering the taxpayer's taxable income since they are not retained by the taxpayer.
D. Tuition for courses taken by a self-employed insurance agent that are required to maintain licensure in the taxpayer's state of residence is deductible as a business expense on Schedule C, reducing the taxpayer's net profit from self-employment.
In summary, the non-deductible item for an individual taxpayer is A $3,000 contribution to a Roth IRA by a 58-year-old taxpayer.
To know more about taxpayer, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28446902#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
Assuming a taxpayer does not exceed any income limitations that reduce or eliminate any of the following items, which of the following is not deductible by an individual taxpayer?
A. A $3,000 contribution to a Roth IRA by a 58 year old taxpayer. [80%]
B. A penalty resulting from premature withdrawal of funds from a certificate of deposit (CD). [12%]
C. Fees received for jury duty that are remitted to the taxpayer's employer. [5%]
D. Tuition for courses taken by a self-employed insurance agent that are required to maintain licensure in the taxpayer's state of residence. [3%]
Suppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.VSuppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Suppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.
The above scenario is an example of what?
Answer:
Negligent misrepresentation
Explanation:
As you can see in the question above, the operators' neglect to adjust the scale properly to ensure the proper functioning and accuracy of weighing resulted in the exposure of incorrect information that hindered the transportation and sale of a certain product. This is a case of Negligent misrepresentation, since there was a display of a false statement due to imprudence, a negligence.
How can the Magna Carta be considered a revolutionary document??
Answer:
Magna Carta, which means 'The Great Charter', is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial
Which codes and standards group is a private, nonprofit organization that identifies public requirements for national safety, engineering, and industrial standards?
Answer:
"American National Standards Institute (ANSI)" would be the correct answer.
Explanation:
ANSI is an independent, non-profit organization that promotes voluntary goods, procedures, programs, structures, and employment practices and conformity evaluation systems. The work of ANSI had already provided a fair and constructive way for every stakeholder to take part in the development of standards.
The Jordan Keys law firm represented the Greater Southeast Community Hospital of Washington, D.C., in a medical malpractice suit against the hospital. The hospital was self-insured for the first $1,000,000 of liability and the St. Paul Insurance Co. provided excess coverage up to $4,000,000. The law firm was owed $67,000 for its work on the malpractice suit when the hospital went into bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court ordered the law firm to release its files on the case to St. Paul to defend under the excess coverage insurance, and the Jordan Keys firm sued St. Paul for its legal fees of $67,000 expended prior to the bankruptcy under an “implied-in-fact contract” because the insurance company would have the benefit of all of its work. Decide. [Jordan Keys v. St. Paul Fire, 870 A.2d 58 (D.C.)] what is the answer?
The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
What led the court to this decision to decide in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company?The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.
The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.
Read more about court case here;
https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1
(There is a photo of a door with blood splatter)
What are 4 pieces of evidence that can be tested at the scene? also please include what departments they can be tested in and how plz!!
Answer: The blood, the door handle, paint, fingerprints,hair,footprints,dust, and if there is a body then they uslly study the body. They can be tested in the CSI and law inforcment, they are tested by the doctors add chemicals and they study it. they study the blood and test how l how long the blood has been there. and by using a magnifyer to see if they missed anything in the blood like dust or dirt or food they study that
Explanation:
Which of the following is an example of self-incrimination?
Select all that apply.
A. An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.
B. The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”
C. Two teenagers arrested for breaking into a house for sale confirmed that they had walked by the house several times and were curious about what had been left inside after the owners moved away, but they had never satisfied their curiosity.
D. A suspect in an auto theft said that he had had always feared being accused of stealing a car after a detective told him he looked like a car thief.
Answer:
B C & D
Explanation:
All of the suspects told the officers evidence that pointed mostly at them for the culprit but didn't confess
Answer:
A- The primary suspect in a hit-and-run collision was asked by investigators to prove she wasn’t at the scene of the accident or face being charged with obstruction of justice. When threatened, she replied, “Okay, I was there at that time, but I don’t think I hit anything.”
D- An elderly woman who had been arrested for fraudulently writing checks on a closed bank account had initially asserted her right to remain silent, but she later blurted out that she’d been part of a criminal enterprise after two detectives indicated she would be facing life in prison unless she confessed immediately.
please hellppppppppppppp.
how was the 1999 constitution formed.
in not less than 150 words.
Answer: The 1999 Constitution was promulgated into law by the military regime of General Abdulsalami Abubakar after the Constitution Debate Co-ordinating Committee led by Justice Niki Tobi submitted its report. The Tobi Committee had barely two months to consult with Nigerians before submitting its report.
Explanation: Hope this helps :)
How does Vicksburg Firearms try and back up their case in the courtroom (who testifies, what do they say, what evidence is introduced)?
In order to get the importance of the Vicksburg Firearms in the case, it's important to understand the context clues and the inference that can be deduced.
What are context clues?Your information is incomplete as you didn't provide the passage it case. Therefore, an overview will be given.
Context clues simply means the hints that are provided by the author in a literary work.
It's important to read and understand the story given first. Then, analyze the context clues given in the story. This is important to understand how Vicksburg Firearms back up their case in the courtroom.
Learn more about context clues on:
https://brainly.com/question/24750804
It is 1782 and a German aristocrat is having difficulty with his young son. The boy is consistently late for his studies and seems to be in the middle of any mischief that occurs in the house. The aristocrat wants to know if this boy has a chance to straighten up or if he is doomed to be a troublemaker his entire life. He takes the boy to the famous doctor Franz Joseph Gall for an examination. What would Dr. Gall be MOST interested in examining? the boy's genes the length of the boy's arms or fingers the shape of the boy's skull the history and family dynamics
Answer:
the boy's genes
the history and family dynamics
Explanation:
Behavior, dedication to studies and intelligence, are characteristics that can be highly influenced by the genetics that an individual presents, as well as by the environment in which that individual is inserted. Based on this statement, in order to present conclusions about the boy shown in the question above, the doctor would need to assess the boy's genetic makeup, analyzing the genes and being able to look for how it affects his behavior. However, the doctor will also need to know the dynamics and family history, to know how the environment that the boy is inserted in has influenced him.
Answer:
the shape of the boy’s skull
Explanation:
laws that require nationals to hold a majority interest in an operation are known as :
Answer:
Some takeovers in the old days were caused by (INDIGENIZATION) laws, which required that nationals hold a majority interest in the operation.
An interest group tracks the poor performance of an executive branch agency and reports this information to lawmakers. This is an informal example of which part of the political system?.
This is an informal example of checks and balances of the political system.
The force of the Executive Branch is vested in the Leader of the US, who likewise goes about as head of state and President of the military. The President is liable for carrying out and upholding the regulations composed by Congress and, keeping that in mind, delegates the tops of the government organizations, including the Bureau. The VP is likewise essential for the Presidential Branch, prepared to accept the Administration should the need emerge.
to know more about Administration click here:
https://brainly.in/question/26995906
#SPJ4
This is an informal example of checks and balances of the political system.
The force of the Executive Branch is vested in the Leader of the US, who likewise goes about as head of state and President of the military. The President is liable for carrying out and upholding the regulations composed by Congress and, keeping that in mind, delegates the tops of the government organizations, including the Bureau. The VP is likewise essential for the Presidential Branch, prepared to accept the Administration should the need emerge.
to know more about Administration click here:
https://brainly.in/question/26995906
#SPJ4
an individual who has been the subject of a crime can prosecute the alleged criminal
True, a person who has been the victim of a crime can prosecute the alleged criminal.
Alleged: stated to be true but not yet proven to be true; the crime may be referred to as the "alleged crime" until the trial is completed.To allege is to assert or claim something as true; to make an allegation. [Last updated by the Wex Definitions Team in June 2021] criminal justice. Prosecute means to initiate criminal proceedings against someone in criminal law. The prosecuting attorney, for example, a local District Attorney, state Attorney General, or federal United States Attorney, initiates such actions. Alleged can also be used as the past tense of the verb allege, which means to claim before or without proof.
Learn more about prosecute here:
https://brainly.com/question/29415296
#SPJ4
What does the acronym CAPOW Stand for? Why is it important conducting research for a speech?
Answer:
It should be stated clearly toward the beginning of the speech. What does CAPOW Stand for. Currency, authorship, purpose, objectivity, writing style.
Due to the system of federalism, which of the following courts has the broadest subject matter jurisdiction? a Charleston County Trial Court (state of South Carolina) b The United States (federal) District Court for the District of South Carolina c The United States (federal) Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
d The United States (federal) Supreme Court
The United States (federal) Supreme Court has the broadest subject matter jurisdiction due to the system of federalism.The answer is B.
In the United States, the federal system is based on the separation of power between the central government and the state governments. Under this system, courts have jurisdiction over cases involving federal law, state law, or both. The United States Supreme Court has the broadest subject matter jurisdiction due to its power of judicial review.
It is the only court in the United States with the power to interpret the Constitution and to review federal and state laws to determine if they are constitutional. The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction, which means that it hears appeals from lower courts and can overrule their decisions.The answer is B.
To know more about jurisdiction, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714#
#SPJ11
Casey Martin was a golfer on the PGA Tour who, due to an illness, needed a golf cart to move around the course. After being denied permission to use a cart, Martin sued the PGA. Many of the players on the tour objected to the suggestion that Martin should be allowed to use a cart. Which of the following objections to Martin’s being allowed to use the cart is an expression of teleological reasoning?a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.” c) “The PGA is a private organization. The courts should not tell a private organization what to do.” d) (a) and (b). e) (a), (b), and (c).
Answer:
d) (a) and (b).
Explanation:
Teleology is any philosophical account of the purpose of a thing
Teological reasoning has to do with finding a reason to explain the phenomena in relation to purpose they serve instead of their causes.
From the scenario given, Martin was refused permission to use a cart to play golf due to an illness and the objections to Martin's use of the cart are a0 a) “Walking the course is part of the game. If you allow Martin to ride a cart, he really isn’t playing the game anymore.” b) “If Martin does not have to walk the course, he will have an unfair advantage.”
Answer: A
Explanation:
Ned is a registered nurse who gains a certification to identify and interpret injuries for violent causes. Which type of certification has he gained?
A.
CCI
B.
CMI
C.
ACFEI
D.
CFN
E.
ABFA
Answer:
acfel
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
absolutely not