HELP! According to Hamilton, what is the purpose of the executive pardon? In other words, why would an executive use the pardon?
Answers
ANSWER:
Why Hamilton Promoted Presidential Pardon Power
Eugene Debs, the Socialist presidential candidate pardoned by President Harding in 1921.
The highest number of pardons in the 20th century were issued by Franklin D. Roosevelt, who in his three-plus terms in office, issued 3,600 pardons and commutations of sentences, the vast majority of which were full pardons. FDR averaged about 880 pardons for each year he was in office – the highest in modern times. The rate then gradually declined, so that by the time of Presidents Nixon and Ford, the rate was about 150 per year. Jimmy Carter, in addition to the Vietnam War amnesty, granted a little over 125 a year. Under Ronald Reagan, the numbers dropped further, to about 50 per year; and under George H.W. Bush, the number of pardons fell even more, to fewer than 20 a year. Bill Clinton increased the rate back to about 50 a year, roughly the same as Reagan. Under George W. Bush, the numbers plummeted again, down to fewer than 25 a year. President Obama changed things little, averaging slightly more than 25 a year – although he issued a record number of commutations of sentences, almost all of which were for drug offenses.
Bottom line: the Constitutional power of presidential pardon, viewed as essential to the administration of justice by the Constitution’s Framers, has all but been ignored by recent presidents, even as the United States continues to display the highest rate of incarceration, and largest number of prisoners, in the world. The total U.S. prison population (state and federal) skyrocketed in the 1980s due to mandatory sentencing laws, and although decreasing slightly over the past ten years, is still about five times greater than it was in 1980. The decrease is largely due to reductions in sentences for drug-related offenses.
The total number of federal inmates today is about 185,000, which is over seven times greater than in 1980, and about 23 times greater than it was 90 years ago – all of which reflects the “federalization” of crime, i.e., the expanding number of offenses defined by Congress and the Justice Department as federal crimes. So, as the number of federal prisoners has gone way up, the number of pardons issued has gone way down. And this despite widespread of exposure of prosecutorial misconduct and abuse by the FBI and the Justice Department over decades.
The Founding Fathers and the Framers – most notably George Washington and Alexander Hamilton – saw the pardon power as essential to mitigate or remedy injustice, but modern Presidents have turned a blind eye to this explicit constitutional provision, because of pragmatism and political cowardice. If President Trump takes steps to reverse this decline, it will be for the good of the nation.
image_pdfimage_print
Explanation:
Related Questions
Pedestrian have to be on the sidewalk or crosswalk at all the time?
Answers
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
It is a safety hazard if they aren't, unless they are crossing the street or so.
A man with a current hunting license, is taking his 10-year-old son on the boy’s first hunting trip. The man is carrying two weapons on the back seat of their car. One is a standard rifle, approximately 30 inches in overall length. The other rifle is 24 inches in overall length so it can be fired more easily by a smaller person. On their way, the man is stopped for a traffic violation. The officer notices the guns and when he inspects them, he discovers an unspent round in the larger rifle. What crime(s) have been committed, if any?
Answers
The potential crime that is said to have been committed is one that is seen as the violation of the Federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of the year 1990 (GFSZA).
What is the license about?The GFSZA is known to be one that tends to makes it illegal for any person to do in his or her right sense possess a firearm in a school zone, and this is made up of any area within 1,000 feet of a school.
However, it is vital that one note that there are cases where there has been exceptions to the GFSZA, for example if the person is possessing the firearm is licensed by the state or is hunting or carrying out other forms of lawful activities.
Learn more about license from
https://brainly.com/question/26006107
#SPJ1
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answers
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
What’s I called when someone breaks a law on purpose to show injustice
Answers
Good Morning Everyone!!! I would appreciate if someone answered this for me
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!!! hope y'all have a good and safe day!!
Answers
Answer:
its D
Explanation:
What is MOST likely to happen when a bullet is fired 12 to 18 inches from a target?
A.
It leaves a halo of smoke around the bullet hole.
B.
It doesn’t leave any signs of gunpowder residue.
C.
It creates a circle of lead around the bullet hole.
D.
It forms a star-shaped pattern around the bullet hole.
Answers
The thing that MOST likely to happen when a bullet is fired 12 to 18 inches from a target is A.It leaves a halo of smoke around the bullet hole.
What happen once the bullet is fired?A halo of smoke will frequently surround the bullet hole if the gun is shot from 12 to 18 inches away from the target. The target may still exhibit gunpowder residue at a distance of 25 inches.
The gas created by the powder burning expands quickly inside the cartridge. The bullet is forced quickly out of the cartridge and down the barrel by the expanding gas. The bullet spins as it exits the barrel due to the rifling in the barrel. A "bang" is produced by the bullet's speed and ejecting gases.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about bullet at:
https://brainly.com/question/26707368
#SPJ1
different types of paperwork and professional documents which are required for firefighters
Answers
Answer:
1. Personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements.
2. Standard operating procedures (SOPs).
3. Fire department policies and procedures.
4. Local, state, and federal laws and regulations.
5. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards.
6. Incident reports.
7. Training records.
8. Medical records.
9. Safety reports.
10. Investigative reports.
1. The other name for Newton's 1st Law of Motion is
Answers
Answer:
Also known as the law of inertia.
Explanation:
Which division of government seems to have the most direct influence over you? Explain your answer
Answers
Answer:
The republicans and democrats because when one person has a different thinking than the other there is a lot of conflict. Like when trump lost all the republicans were mad at the democrats for choosing a president to the other sides perspective wasn’t good enough.
Explanation:
Was David Parker ray a psychopath or a person with psychosis
Answers
DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND SUPREME COURT OF APEAL
Answers
Answer:
The difference is that the supreme court determines if the law is final and binding, while the constitutional court only deals with constitutional laws.
Explanation:
The constitutional court is established by the constitution.
The supreme court interprets the laws and decides whether a law is relevant or how it should be applied.
The Supreme Court of Appeal, on the other hand, is responsible for hearing appeals from lower courts and ensuring that the law is applied correctly. It is the highest court in the country for non-constitutional matters and has the power to review and change decisions made by lower courts.
What court system was the cunningham v. Enterprise rent-a-car company case tried in?.
Answers
Answer:
Oldham County Circuit Court of Kentucky on February 14, 15, 16, 2005. The case involved a wrongful death claim against the driver of an Enterprise Rent-A-Car and a negligent entrustment claim against Enterprise Rent-A-Car.
Explanation:
PLS MARK BRAINLIEST I TRIED MY BEST
Need help asap check my profile I have more questions about the same assignment that I need help with
Answers
In the question related to Marbury v. Madison and McCullough v. Maryland are:
Question 47 — true
Question 48 — used the Necessary and Proper Clause to expand the power of Congress.
Question 49 — expanded the power of the Executive branch.
What is the Marbury v. Madison?
In the famous Marbury v. Madison decision, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), the U.S. Supreme Court established the idea of judicial review, which states that American courts have the authority to invalidate laws and acts that they determine to be in conflict with the U.S. Constitution. Marbury, which was decided in 1803, is seen to be the single most significant case in American constitutional law. Defining the line between the executive and judicial branches of the federal government, which are constitutionally separate, was made easier by the Supreme Court's landmark decision, which established that the U.S. Constitution is actual law and not just a statement of political principles and ideals.
To lean more about Marbury v. Madison from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/19334594
#SPJ1
Question 47 of 50
Marbury v. Madison gave the Supreme Court equal standing with the Executive and Legislative branches.
O True
O False
Question 48 of 50
McCullough v. Maryland was a significant Supreme Court case because it:
O used the Necessary and Proper Clause to expand the power of Congress.
O found that state laws were the supreme laws of the land.
O expanded the powers of the Executive branch.
O allowed the President to deploy troops without a Congressional declaration of war.
O restricted the power of the Legislative branch.
Question 49 of 50
The main similarity between Marbury v. Madison, McCullough v Maryland, and U.S. V Nixon is that all three cases
O n expanded the power of the Judicial branch.
O 4 restricted the power of state courts.
O expanded the power of the Executive branch.
O decreased the power of the Legislative branch.
O decreased the power of the Judicial branch.
What event was a major determining factor in the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1861?
the Dred Scott Casev
the Three-Fifths Compromise
the Jim Crow laws
the Equal Rights Amendment
Answers
Answer:
the Dred Scott Case
Explanation:
The Dred Scott case was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in 1857, which held that African Americans could not be considered citizens of the United States and therefore could not sue in federal court. This decision further fueled tensions between the North and the South over the issue of slavery, as it appeared to open the door to the expansion of slavery into new territories and states.
Identify two parts of the constitution mentioned in the Kormatsu Vs. U.S. supreme court case.
PLS HELP ME! I HAVE TO PRESENT THIS TOMMOROW!
Answers
2. That while the government cannot expel large groups of people from their housing, when under certain circumstances like warfare and peril, the need to protect is greater.
I believe that is what you’re asking? I hope I helped a bit
5.The Supreme Court outlawed malapportionment because it
A.gives too much power to city dwellers
B.is unfair to minority groups
C.does not allow senators to represent enough people
D.does not give each citizen an equal voice in government
Answers
Malapportionment is the unequal distribution of voting power among voters or districts. In the case of the United States, it often refers to the unequal distribution of voters in legislative districts. The Supreme Court has ruled that such malapportionment is unconstitutional because it violates the principle of "one person, one vote" and does not give each citizen an equal voice in government. By outlawing malapportionment, the Court sought to ensure that each citizen's vote would have roughly equal weight and influence, regardless of where they live or which district they vote in.
5. Even though most people finding the burning of the American flag objectionable, it is protected under the First Amendment. Why should the right to so such a thing be protected? Explain.
Answers
Answer:
This is a very controversial topic, The First Amendment states that we are given the freedom of expression, Some say that the Burning of the American flag is considered as expressing yourself, and thus, should be protected. This was written in Texas V.S. Johnson, which based their opinion on the opinion of the cases Stromberg v California, and Tinker v Des Moines, which showed t that non-verbal expression was still protected under the 1st amendment.
which of the following is the equation for determining the coefficient friction
Answers
The equation for determining the coefficient of friction is:
coefficient of friction = frictional force / normal force
What is the explanation for the above response?The coefficient of friction is a dimensionless scalar quantity that measures the resistance of two objects to slide against each other.
It is denoted by the symbol "μ" and can be expressed as the ratio of the force required to move one surface over another to the normal force pressing the two surfaces together. In other words, it quantifies the frictional force that acts between two objects when they are in contact and at rest or in motion. The value of the coefficient of friction ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating greater frictional force.
Learn more about coefficient friction at:
https://brainly.com/question/13828735
#SPJ1
Meaning of transparency
Answers
Answer:
a piece of plastic on which you can write or draw or that has a picture, etc. on it that you look at by putting it on a special machine (projector) and shining light through it
Answer:
1 : the quality or state of being transparent
2 : something transparent
especially : a picture (as on film) viewed by light shining through it or by projection
Someone else can drive your car if _____.
A. you have proof of residency
B. they have proof of insurance
C. they have proof of residency
D. you have proof of insurance
Answers
Answer: B.
Explanation:
Option B states that someone else can drive your car if they have proof of insurance. This means that if the person who wants to drive your car can provide valid proof that they have insurance coverage, they are allowed to drive your car. Insurance coverage is important as it protects against potential accidents or damages that may occur while driving the vehicle. By requiring proof of insurance, it ensures that the driver is financially responsible and covered in case of any incidents. This requirement helps protect both the driver and the owner of the car.
plzz answer my question its urgent plzz
Answers
Answer:This is what I know
Explanation:
Laws are never respected nor unforced in India. Indians follow all rules and laws when they are in a foreign country in the Western world. However, when they are in India, they usually don’t follow Indian laws. There are several reasons for Indians are not following the rules in India like
1: Lenient Laws-The Indian laws are extremely lenient and flexible. Often the penalty for violating the law is so low that it would be profitable to break the law.
2:Poor enforcement-The enforcement of law is quite poor due to shortage of government officials, corruption and slow justice delivery system. Even when a case is booked against the offender, it takes several years for the culprit to bring to justice.
3: Wrong role model-The leaders and top officials in India are often the first people to break the law. They even take pride of doing so. That set a wrong example before the common people in India who follow their footsteps.
QUESTION OF THE DAY!!!!
Why can't pirates finish the alphabet?
AND WRITE WHYYY
have a nice day
Answers
and they live out to the sea
Pirates can't finish the alphabet because they get lost at "C"! The joke about pirates being unable to complete the alphabet is derived from the standard pirate pronunciation, in which the "r" is pronounced "arrr".
When they say "sea" it sounds like "sea", which puts them in a loop. It's a fun way to poke fun at the pirate character and popular culture depictions of pirates. While actual pirates did not speak in this manner, the amusing stereotype has become established in mainstream culture and children's media, encouraging this type of joke. It's a delightful and whimsical reminder of the enduring obsession with pirates and their famous portrayals in literature and movies.
Learn more about Pirates, here:
https://brainly.com/question/20392814
#SPJ4
Who is edmond locard
Answers
here is your answer. ...
scotland provides an especially good contemporary example of substantive criminal law in the common legal tradition because scottish courts take an active role in judge-made law. true false
Answers
It is TRUE that scottland provides an especially good contemporary example of substantive criminal law.
What is substantive criminal law ?
Civil law's rights and obligations and criminal law's offences and penalties are defined by substantive law. It may be enshrined in statutes or be recogonised by common law tradition.
What is an example of substantive?
A substantive law establishes a legal connection or forbids particular behaviour. In other words, it specifies what you are able to do. For instance, a state that prohibits stealing. Such a law would be substantive.
To know more about law follow the given link https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
What are some common Justifications for comitting a crime? If you were defending a person who committed the crime of murder what justification would you try to use to be found not guilty of the crime?
Answers
The person did this so they had to kill them
They were defending themselves
Answer:
Self protection
mental disorder
Explanation:
The importance and benefit of the 'rule of law' as a democratic principle which supports a democracy
Answers
Explanation:
The rule of law, defended by an independent judiciary, plays a crucial function by ensuring that civil and political rights and civil liberties are safe and that the equality and dignity of all citizens are not at risk.PLZ HURRY!!!!
One article posed a question to fellow attorneys: Should there be an ethical requirement of civility in the rules of professional conduct requested
of lawyers?
Write at least five notes in response to this question.
Answers
There most definitely should be ethical requirements of civility in reference to how lawyers conduct themselves.
Whether a lawyer is for or against a side, they should always respect them as a person.
Being in such a formal setting requires formal behavior as well. If a lawyer cannot be civil and maintain basic morals, then perhaps they should be sent out to compose themselves.
Acting without ethical civility is immature. A professional should not be unable to control themselves in a legal situation. If a young child is expected to be "nice," then an adult lawyer should be held to the same standards.
Success is largely based upon their ability to fit the setting in which their work is completed.
Answer: As a lawyer, you should treat all cases as equal even the opposing case. As a lawyer, you must show respect and maintain a sense of patients and formality in any case a lawyer, you have obligations to uphold, and maturely as well your morals should be set in stone from the very beginning if you are to thrive as a lawyer you must behave like a lawyer however will you maintain a job then. It is one's job as a lawyer to represent the offender or victim's claim and uphold peace and patients in a formal polite manner.
Explanation:
Which Amendment to the Constitution (Specifically in the Bill of Rights) is the most important, why do you believe that?
2-3 sentences
Answers
Should i go for law or medicine?
im currently choosing my subjects and would appreciate if someone helped or sorta guided me towards one of the paths
Answers
since you probably know what each is about, law is more stocks and numbers where medicine is more or so specific terms for curtain specifications in the field. I study law! This way, you can learn the ways of the governmental infrastructure and the governmental system as well as how they work since we are currently living in a corrupt society, this would be beneficial to you.as well the fact that I study United States Government and Politics. you may choose which best interests you! Best of luck in the future.
ano ang gagawin mo para walang mamamayang magbuwis ng buhay
Answers
Answer:
Ang aking gagawin ay Poprotektahan ko ang aking bayan