How important is it for us to keep asking questions about ourselves and the world around us?

Answer:

Machu Pichu

Explanation:

Answer:

1 iambic heptameter

2   Trochaic

3 iambic pentameter

4 dactlyic

Explanation:

I am one hundred percent correct

ps dont mind my spellinng.

I wholeheartedly agree

Answer:

I am looking for a job to pay bills and but grocery.

I deal with stress very easily

I would calm down and say ok i will find out ok.

You should hire me because I am great with people and I would be a great employee

I will expect out of my coworkers that they won't be disrespectful

I expect that he or she will be nice.

12 hours a week, monday, wesnday, and thrusday, around 3:00

I see my self in five years hopefully in a better postion here and have money.

Explanation:

Answer:

This depends on you and your own class. My personal answer would be:

Explanation:

There are a few things I would like to change about my class, involving time management and classmate cooperation. One rule that I think needs to be changed is pop quizzes. There shouldn't be many difficult pop quizzes teachers assign, as many students have their own lives and might not have studied/prepared for them. Moreover, I prefer less homework since we don't always understand the problems or even have time to complete them on time.

List of changes:

- Not a lot of homework assigned every day

- The classroom is clean, and the atmosphere is welcoming

- Teachers and students follow the rules and cooperate better with each other

Answer:

"One glance was enough. The astonished youth fell on his knees, crying out in wonder at the beauty of the child’s work."

Explanation:

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

k12

Answer:

The answer is A. Be sure to wear boots - not sandals or sneakers - on the hike.

Explanation:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

A logical fallacy using something as proof or evidence that should not simply be assumed/ the evidence requires more proof, is considered begging the question.

A logical fallacy is any type of flawed reasoning that leads to a false conclusion. When arguing or debating, we will often state one or more premises, that is, the pieces of information that function as the basis of our argument. Then, from those premises, we draw conclusions. For example:

The conclusion above makes sense considering the premise. However, it the speaker were to conclude "it will likely be sunny today," we would have a logical fallacy here.

Begging the question refers to fallacies that already start off wrong. In this case, people assume their conclusion is right and include that assumption in their premise. For example:

We cannot simply assume self-defense murder is a bad thing, after all the person who does it is clearly trying to save his or her own life. Therefore, this is a "begging the question" fallacy.

Learn more about logical fallacies here:

https://brainly.com/question/4255659

#SPJ1

The two quotes that best support the answers to Part A are:

C. "My stomach was a melon split wide inside my skin." (Line 6)

E. "Years later I smile to think of that journey, / the borders we must cross separately, / stamped with our unanswerable woes." (Lines 12-14)

1. In Part A, the passage describes a journey and the emotions and experiences of the narrator.

2. Quote C, "My stomach was a melon split wide inside my skin" (Line 6), supports the answer that the narrator feels physically distressed and overwhelmed during the journey. The description of the stomach as a melon split wide inside the skin evokes a sense of intense discomfort or pain, emphasizing the physical impact of the journey.

3. Quote E, "Years later I smile to think of that journey, / the borders we must cross separately, / stamped with our unanswerable woes" (Lines 12-14), supports the answer that the journey was significant and left a lasting impression on the narrator. The mention of smiling years later suggests a reflective and nostalgic perspective, indicating that despite the difficulties faced during the journey, the narrator finds some value or meaning in it. The reference to crossing borders separately and being stamped with unanswerable woes hints at the challenges and emotional burdens associated with the journey.

4. The other quotes, A, B, D, and F, do not directly align with the themes of physical distress or the long-lasting impact of the journey, as discussed in Part A. Therefore, quotes C and E are the most relevant and supportive of the answers provided.

For more such questions on quotes, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/27143677

#SPJ8

The Paradox of War: Exploring the Contradictions of Horror and Beauty

Introduction:

In Tim O'Brien's novel, war is depicted as an essential paradox—simultaneously horrific and beautiful. The characters in the story are confronted with the contradictory nature of war, experiencing moments of terror and devastation alongside instances of unexpected beauty and profound human connection.

Through poignant examples such as Lemon's death and the encounter with the "chemo girl," O'Brien masterfully highlights the complexities and contradictions inherent in the wartime experience.

Body:

Lemon's Death:

One striking example of the paradoxical nature of war is demonstrated through the death of Ted Lavender, a young soldier in O'Brien's platoon. The horrific aspect of war is evident as Ted Lavender tragically loses his life, his death serving as a reminder of the unpredictable and destructive forces at play.

The gruesome realities of violence and loss are portrayed, leaving the characters and readers devastated. However, amidst this horror, O'Brien also manages to find beauty.

He describes the surreal and poetic nature of Lemon's death, depicting the tranquil setting of the battlefield and the delicate balance between life and death.

This juxtaposition underscores the paradox of war, where moments of unexpected beauty emerge amidst the chaos and tragedy.

The Chemo Girl:

Another instance that exemplifies the paradox of war is the encounter with the "chemo girl." While seeking refuge from the harsh realities of combat, O'Brien and his comrades stumble upon a young girl receiving chemotherapy in a medical facility.

Here, the horror of war is starkly contrasted with the beauty of compassion and shared humanity. Witnessing the vulnerability of a sick child prompts a collective introspection among the soldiers, challenging their notions of purpose and the value of life.

In this moment, war becomes a catalyst for a profound sense of empathy and an appreciation for the preciousness of existence, revealing the unexpected beauty that can arise even in the darkest of circumstances.

Personal Reflections and Transformations:

Throughout the novel, O'Brien delves into the characters' individual experiences and internal conflicts, further highlighting the paradoxical nature of war.

The soldiers grapple with their own emotions, navigating the tension between the horrors they witness and the resilience and camaraderie that emerge from these experiences.

Moments of fear, guilt, and despair are intertwined with instances of love, bravery, and loyalty, creating a complex tapestry of emotions and contradictions.

Conclusion:

In Tim O'Brien's novel, war is portrayed as a paradox—a juxtaposition of the horrific and the beautiful. Through vivid storytelling and introspective reflections, O'Brien captures the multidimensional nature of war, showcasing how moments of terror and devastation coexist with unexpected instances of beauty and humanity.

The death of Lemon and the encounter with the "chemo girl" are just two powerful examples that epitomize this paradox, provoking contemplation on the contradictory nature of war.

By exploring these contradictions, O'Brien invites readers to grapple with the complexities of human experience and challenges prevailing notions about war.

Ultimately, this examination of war's paradoxical nature serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring impact it has on individuals and society as a whole.

For more questions on: Paradox

https://brainly.com/question/12861235

#SPJ11

Answer:It enhances the beauty of the writing. It makes the sentence deeper and leaves the reader with a sense of wonder. It brings life to the words used by the writer. The figure of Speech not only shows the writer's intent but also his purpose in using such language.

Explanation:

The  Emancipation Proclamation proclaimed that slavery was outlawed in states that separate.

What was The  Emancipation Proclamation?

The Emancipation Proclamation, edict published by U.S. President Abraham Lincoln on January 1, 1863, that released the slaves of the Confederate states in rebellion against the Union. Lincoln was focused entirely on disarming the South. However, careless of intentions, the Emancipation Proclamation signaled a shift in the purpose of the Civil War.

The Emancipation Proclamation did more than take up the war to the level of a crusade for human freedom. It brought some significant practical results, because it allowed the Union to recruit Black soldiers.

The  Emancipation Proclamation proclaimed that slavery was outlawed in states that separate.

To know more about The  Emancipation Proclamation, refer the link below:-

https://brainly.com/question/24486925

#SPJ4

Answer: what who where and how.

Answer:

According to Shakespeare as the author of this play, He portrays Caesar as an ambitious and loyal man. He is a prisoner of his principles and always fixed to the laws of public institutions. He was charged by his conspirators as someone whose judgment is delusional because he looks for absolute power over Rome which was not true. His faith in his principles and obedience to the law did not allow him to quit going to the Senate. He does not pay heed to his wife's dream because he was a man of his words.

Explanation:

Caesar's aura and public image was immortal to him and he always has a deep faith on his capabilities. The ideas of Caesar which were conflicting to Rome powerful elite made sense by the end of the play in Act V when Brutus finally accepted that Caeser's power is beyond his grave and producing misfortune for them.

Answer:

Julius Caesar, the Roman dictator, was assassinated by a group of senators on the Ides of March (15 March) of 44 BC during a meeting of the Senate at the Curia of Pompey of the Theatre of Pompey in Rome. The senators stabbed Caesar 23 times. The senators claimed to be acting over fears that Caesar's unprecedented concentration of power during his dictatorship was undermining the Roman Republic, and presented the deed as an act of tyrannicide. At least 60 senators were party to the conspiracy, led by Marcus Junius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus. Despite the death of Caesar, the conspirators were unable to restore the institutions of the Republic. The ramifications of the assassination led to the Liberators' civil war and ultimately to the Principate period of the Roman Empire.

\Caesar had served the Republic for eight years in the Gallic Wars, fully conquering the region of Gaul (roughly equivalent to modern-day France). After the Roman Senate demanded Caesar to disband his army and return home as a civilian, he refused, crossing the Rubicon with his army and plunging Rome into Caesar's Civil War in 49 BC. After defeating the last of the opposition, Caesar was appointed dictator perpetuo ("dictator in perpetuity") in early 44 BC.[2] Roman historian Titus Livius describes three incidents that occurred from 45 to 44 BC as the final causes of Caesar's assassination – the "three last straws" as far as some Romans were concerned.[3]

The first incident took place in December 45 BC or possibly early 44 BC.[3] According to Roman historian Cassius Dio, after the Senate had voted to bestow a large group of honours upon Caesar, they decided to present them to him formally, and marched as a senatorial delegation to the Temple of Venus Genetrix.[4] When they arrived, etiquette called for Caesar to stand up to greet the senators, but he did not rise. He also joked about their news, saying that his honours needed to be cut back instead of increased.[5] Roman historian Suetonius wrote (almost 150 years later) that Caesar failed to rise in the temple, either because he was restrained by the consul Lucius Cornelius Balbus or that he balked at the suggestion he should rise.[6] Regardless of the reasoning, by practically rejecting a senatorial gift and not acknowledging the delegation's presence with proper etiquette, Caesar gave the strong impression that he no longer cared about the Senate.[5]

The second incident occurred in 44 BC. One day in January, the tribunes Gaius Epidius Marullus and Lucius Caesetius Flavus discovered a diadem on the head of the statue of Caesar on the Rostra in the Roman Forum.[5] According to Suetonius, the tribunes ordered that the wreath be removed as it was a symbol of Jupiter and royalty.[7] Nobody knew who had placed the diadem, but Caesar suspected that the tribunes had arranged for it to appear so that they could have the honour of removing it.[5] Matters escalated shortly after on the 26th, when Caesar was riding on horseback to Rome on the Appian Way.[8] A few members of the crowd greeted him as rex ("king"), to which Caesar replied, "I am not Rex, but Caesar" ("Non sum Rex, sed Caesar").[9] This was wordplay; "Rex" was a family name as well as a Latin title. Marullus and Flavus, the aforementioned tribunes, were not amused, and ordered the man who first cried "Rex" arrested. In a later senate meeting, Caesar accused the tribunes of attempting to create opposition to him, and had them removed from office and membership in the Senate.[8] The Roman plebs took their tribunes seriously as the representatives of the common people; Caesar's actions against the tribunes put him on the wrong side of public opinion.[10]

The third incident took place at the festival of the Lupercalia, on the 15 February 44 BC. Mark Antony, who had been elected co-consul with Caesar, climbed onto the Rostra and placed a diadem on Caesar's head, saying "The People give this to you through me." While a few members of the crowd applauded, most responded with silence. Caesar removed the diadem from his head; Antony again placed it on him, only to get the same response from the crowd.[11] Finally, Caesar put it aside to use as a sacrifice to Jupiter Optimus Maximus.[7] "Jupiter alone of the Romans is king," Caesar said, which received an enthusiastic response from the crowd.[11] At the time, many believed that Caesar's rejection of the diadem was a way for him to see if there was enough support for him to become king, and despised him for it.[12]

According to Suetonius, Caesar's assassination ultimately occurred primarily due to concerns that he wished to crown himself the king of Rome.[13] These concerns were exacerbated by the "three last straws" of 45 and 44 BC. In just a few months, Caesar had disrespected the Senate, removed People's Tribunes, and toyed with monarchy. By February, the conspiracy that caused his assassination was being born.[12]

Explanation:

Answer:

The maid because she said she was dusting the corners of a circular house. Hope this helps!

Explanation:

Note that in the great Gatsby,  Daisy does not seem truly happy when she's talking alone with Nick.

Throughout the novel, Daisy appears to be disillusioned and unsatisfied with her life, despite her wealth and social status.

She also seems to be trapped in her unhappy marriage with Tom Buchanan. When she is alone with Nick, she may express some moments of happiness or relief, but she often returns to her unhappy state.

We can say therefore, that  Daisy's character is complex and multifaceted, and her true feelings and motivations are often difficult to discern.

Learn more about great Gatsby:
https://brainly.com/question/29775350
#SPJ1

Answer: American history is driven by periodic moments of moral convulsion. The late Harvard political scientist Samuel P. Huntington noticed that these convulsions seem to hit the United States every 60 years or so: the Revolutionary period of the 1760s and ’70s; the Jacksonian uprising of the 1820s and ’30s; the Progressive Era, which began in the 1890s; and the social-protest movements of the 1960s and early ’70s.

These moments share certain features. People feel disgusted by the state of society. Trust in institutions plummets. Moral indignation is widespread. Contempt for established power is intense.

A highly moralistic generation appears on the scene. It uses new modes of communication to seize control of the national conversation. Groups formerly outside of power rise up and take over the system. These are moments of agitation and excitement, frenzy and accusation, mobilization and passion.

Explanation:

The answer is

4 Steadier

It seems to me that.. making that noise

Omelia is disappointed that she can't find something to wear for her own dinner party.

Knowing why a reading passage was written allows us to identify the author's purpose. The author writes for one of her four reasons to explain entertain explain inform and persuade. When a passage of reading contains many details about a person place or thing the author's purpose is descriptive.

Passages and paragraphs always refer to a series of sentences summarized in large font. The main difference between a passage and a paragraph is that a passage is an excerpt from a text novel story or paragraph whereas a paragraph is a group of sentences grouped under a subject.

Learn more about Omelia here:- https://brainly.com/question/2351925

#SPJ4

Answer:

1. The conclusion that can be drawn from this passage is that Gilgamesh is encouraging his brother to be courageous and face their current situation without succumbing to fear.

2. The evidence that best supports this conclusion is found in the following statements:

- "Courage, dear brother, this is no time to give in to fear."

- "You were raised in the wild, with your own hands you have killed marauding lions and wolves."

- "You are brave, your heart has been tested in combat."

- "Though your arms feel weak now and your legs tremble, you are a warrior, you know what to do."

These statements highlight Gilgamesh's understanding of his brother's bravery and past experiences. He acknowledges his brother's courage and reminds him of his ability to overcome challenges. By emphasizing his brother's background and accomplishments, Gilgamesh aims to motivate and reassure him in the face of their current situation.

Gilgamesh is shown as a motivational and courageous character in this passage, with evidence coming from his direct dialogue encouraging his brother to remain brave in the face of adversity.

From this passage, we can conclude that Gilgamesh is a very courageous and motivational figure. He emphasizes the importance of courage in the face of adversity, reminding his brother of their journey and all the obstacles they have overcome. His words reveal a strong, encouraging personality. The evidence supporting this conclusion comes from the direct dialogue of Gilgamesh in the passage- he directly urges his brother to be brave, harking back to his brother's feats as a warrior. The courage he exuding and the underlying motivation in his words portray him as a motivational figure.

https://brainly.com/question/34181903

#SPJ2

True.The statement that "persons in western cultures tend to classify objects into discrete categories based on their similarity while persons in eastern cultures tend to classify objects into categories based on their relationships" is generally True.

Western cultures often focus on individual characteristics, while eastern cultures emphasize relationships and context. However, this is a broad generalization and may not apply to every individual within these cultures.

French culture, Spanish culture, and British culture are all subcategories of the broader, looser category of Western culture. Most of Europe and the Western Hemisphere are culturally Western. Eastern culture emphasizes interdependence, hierarchy, and status, while Western culture emphasizes individual uniqueness and equality.

To know more about western cultures  visit:

vhttps://brainly.com/question/3142334

#SPJ11

Answer:

Ok I can do that I'm an English expert

Explanation:

Writers have different interpretations and means to get their main idea and message across.  Sometimes, the message is not as clear, writers may use metaphors, which are figures of speech that applies to an object or action which is not literally accepted in a professional standpoint.  They may use Irony or sarcasm to emphasize their idea.  Often a writer mentions other matches to a problem in the search for a solution.  When writing for an assignment, there are often rules in place for how your lines should be formatted.  The major rules when writing is to get you message across, have a clear main idea, and to consider the professionalism.

e in order to stop fraud you need to keep detailed record of all financial actions taken

The correct term for acting in such a way as to make someone think that you are a peace officer is impersonation.

Impersonation is the act of pretending to be someone else with the intent to deceive or trick others. People often impersonate others to gain access to places or information that they wouldn't have otherwise had access to. Impersonation is illegal and is punishable by law.

Impersonation is a criminal offence in many jurisdictions. Police officers, judges, lawyers, and other public officials are examples of people who are impersonated regularly. The person impersonating the public official can gain access to sensitive information, obtain benefits illegally, and even commit crimes.Impersonation is also prevalent in the virtual world.

People often create fake accounts on social media sites or dating apps to deceive others. The impersonator could steal the victim's money, personal information, or even harm them.In conclusion, impersonation is the act of pretending to be someone else to deceive or harm others. It is a criminal offence in many jurisdictions and is punishable by law.

Learn more about impersonation Here.

https://brainly.com/question/956210

#SPJ11

The correct Order of adjective: long blue wooden ore, round white Persian rug, boring plump middle-aged American housewife. Long straight blond hair, beautiful silver Chinese chalice.

A noun or noun phrase is described with an adjective. Its semantic function is to modify the information the noun provides. Although traditionally they were grouped alongside nouns, adjectives were formerly regarded as one of the primary components of speech in the English language.

The correct Order of adjective: long blue wooden ore, round white Persian rug.

Learn more about adjective, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29635679

#SPJ4

Sojourner Truth uses instances of her personal experiences and abilities as a woman to illustrate her legitimacy and authority to speak on the subject of women's rights, which is an example of an ethos rhetorical appeal.

Speaking or writing persuasively to an audience and getting them to believe something or do something is known as rhetorical appeal. Ethos, logos, and pathos are the three primary varieties of rhetorical appeal.

The speaker or writer's reliability or dependability is emphasized in ethos. In order to construct an argument supported by evidence and facts, logos makes an appeal to logic or reason. In order to elicit an emotional response from the audience, pathos appeals to emotions.

Learn more about rhetorical appeal, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30585710

#SPJ1