how to get guardianship of a child without going to court

the answer is going to be relief

False. The syllabus clearly states that class rules may be modified or amended from time to time as deemed appropriate by the instructor.

The instructor reserves the right to make changes to the syllabus and class rules whenever deemed necessary. This may be done in order to keep up with changes in the subject matter, or in the case of a disruptive student, the instructor may decide to modify the class rules to ensure that all students have a safe learning environment.

Furthermore, the instructor may change class rules in response to feedback from students. It is important to remember that the instructor is the final authority on all decisions regarding the syllabus and class rules. Therefore, while the syllabus may initially state that the class rules are not subject to change, this is not a guarantee that they will never be changed.

Know more about instructor here

https://brainly.com/question/14450776#

#SPJ11

Answer:

The Notary Signing Agent should: Recommend that the borrower contact the lender's representative before signing the documents.

Answer:

1) The Ombudsman may on a complaint by any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly, or on a motion of the Supreme Court or the High Court made during the course of any proceedings before it or of his own motion, undertake any investigation into any allegation of maladministration on the part of any Agency or any of its officers or employees:

Provided that the Ombudsman shall not have any jurisdiction to investigate or inquire into any matters which:-

(a) are subjudice before a Court of competent jurisdiction on the date of the receipt of a complaint, reference or motion by him or

(b) relate to the external affairs of Pakistan or the relations or dealings of Pakistan with any foreign state or Government; or

(c) relate to, or are connected with, the defence of Pakistan or any part thereof, the Military, Naval and Air Forces of Pakistan, or the matters covered by the laws relating to those forces.

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in subsection (1), the Ombudsman shall not entertain for investigation any complaint by or on behalf of a public servant or functionary concerning any matters relating to the Agency in which he is, or has been, working, in respect of any personal grievance relating to his service therein.

(3) For carrying out the objectives of this Act and, in particular for ascertaining the root causes of corrupt practices and injustice, the Ombudsman may arrange for studies to be made or research to be conducted and may recommend appropriate steps for their eradication.

Functions

The law empowers the Ombudsman Punjab to entertain complaints against any department, commission or office of the Provincial Government or a statutory corporation or other institution established or controlled by the Provincial Government but does not include the High Court and the Courts working under the supervision of High Court and Provincial Assembly and its Secretariat.

Under section 9(1) of the Act the Ombudsman on a complaint of any aggrieved person, on a reference by the Government or the Provincial Assembly or on a motion of Supreme Court or the High Court or on his own motion (suo moto) can undertake any investigation into any allegation of ‘maladministration’ on the part of any agency or its officers or employees.

The Ombudsman, however, has no jurisdiction to investigate or enquire into matters which are (a) subjudice before a court of competent jurisdiction (b) relates to the external relations of Pakistan or connected with defence of Pakistan or Military, Naval and Air Force of Pakistan or the matters covered by the laws relating to these Forces. The Ombudsman also cannot entertain for investigation any complaint by or on behalf of a public servant or functionary concerning any matter relating to the agency in which the public servant has been or is working in respect of any personal grievance or relating to his service therein.

Powers

Ombudsman has the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court under the code of civil procedure for summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person; compelling the production of documents; receiving evidence on affidavits and issuing commission for examination of witnesses. The Ombudsman is vested with the powers to enter and search any premises and inspect any article, books of account and other documents; impound and seal such article. The Ombudsman has the same powers, mutatis mutandis, as the High Court has to punish any person for its contempt.

According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.

What is criminal?

The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.

According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.

Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.

Learn more about on criminal, here:

https://brainly.com/question/23059652

#SPJ1

Courts responded on the grounds that the burdens of nuisance abatement that would be placed on the polluter and the community required courts to set regulations that assured that polluters would never be required to abate their nuisances past the point where they could no longer be tolerated.  

The eradication of a problem by the party who has suffered without resorting to legal action is referred to as abatement of nuisance. The law does not favor this type of remedy, but is accessible in specific situations.

Occasionally, a plaintiff's latent sensitivity or susceptibility to more severe harm causes the plaintiff's injuries on abatement of nuisance to be far worse than those that would have been sustained by a typical individual.

Therefore, the nuisance abatement reassured that polluters wouldn't ever be obliged to stop their annoyances before they were intolerable.  

Learn more about the nuisance abatement, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/17751112

#SPJ4

Answer:

Answer in the attachment.

Answer: declaring war on an enemy nation

Explanation:

Answer:

no idea. b

Explanation:

sorry i dont no

Courtney's memory loss in the chapter "Nightmare" is a moving illustration of the psychological wounds that soldiers endure long after they leave the battlefield.

Memory loss results in loss of identity and sense of self in addition to knowledge loss. For example, Courtney's inability to remember the names of her fellow soldiers shows how fragmented her identity is and how she feels isolated from others who have gone through the same tragedy. Furthermore, Courtney's concern for the safety and well-being of her fellow soldiers raises the possibility of a strong sense of survivor's guilt. His memory loss may be a coping mechanism for him as he struggles with the idea that he has lived while others have not.

Learn more about memory loss, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28826460

#SPJ1

Answer:  do u want my love

Explanation:

Answer:

People living on rivers in Canada are entitled to have the water come to them in undiminished quality and quantity. This is an expression of what kind of rights?A) natural lawB) riparian rightsC) real property rightsD) strict liability rightsE) environmental rights

Explanation:

it's RIPARIAN RIGHTS

MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST THANK YOU

Answer:

The high imprisonment rate in the U.S can have economic impact on social society, since incarceration can have effects like obstructing employment and increase rates of poverty.

The best action to take to help a co-worker from aggressors is to A. Ask another employee who is walking into the workplace to help you disrupt the situation.

This refers to the disagreement that exists between two or more entities where there is a constant struggle among them.

Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario of a person being harrassed in the parking lot, the best action to take based on that the aggressors do not work there is to ask another employee who is walking into the workplace to help you disrupt the situation.

Read more about conflict resolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/24769299

#SPJ1

You must have a reason for each question you pose during direct examination. If you are the plaintiff's attorney, consider how the witness assists you in meeting your burden of proof. Pattern Jury Instructions should serve as a guide for practitioners. Cross-examination is typically regarded as the most challenging aspect of the varied responsibilities of the lawyer. There is no quick 47 shortcut or royal path to mastering the craft of advocacy. Personal 48 experience and imitating people who have been educated in the art are the most reliable ways to become proficient in this crucial need of a professional trial lawyer.

What are the elements of direct examination?

Keep things simple.

Wherever you are, practise speaking like a normal person. either at home or the workplace. It doesn't matter if you're outside or inside the court. A specific legal term of art should only be used when absolutely necessary. Otherwise, write as you normally would for both personal and professional topics. Legalese should be avoided in court because it "is a deadly collection of language habits that we unknowingly turn on or off." Ask a tough question of witnesses and you'll receive a tough answer, according to the saying. A long, rambling query will elicit a long, meandering response. If you ask a confusing question, you'll either get a confusing response or none at all. "Brevity can be crucial.

Make use of topic sentences or headings

"Conversation and direct examination are not the same thing. It ought to sound like one, but it doesn't. Though you do it correctly, you will lead the witness through the entire process without ever coming across as if you are dictating what the witness should say. "The headline way of direct" should be used to direct the witness. The headline technique of direct is described as follows: "[i]n advance of each new set of questions, declare the topic: the headline that informs the witness—and everyone else—what the subject is going to be." The "paragraph method" is another name for the straight headline approach.

To learn more about direct and cross examination from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/9010663

#SPJ1

Discuss (one paragraph minimum) what's involved in both a direct and cross examination of a witness. Please list and discuss at least three elements for both.

They are so large and accelerate so quickly that there is little, if any, warning to get out of the path of a large avalanche makes them particularly dangerous. Massive snow slabs that come loose from a hillside can cause disastrous avalanches.

As it rushes downward, the mass of snow shatters like shattered glass. According to Trautman, these dangers can move up to 100 mph, or as rapidly as cars on a freeway. A avalanche mass of snow, rock, ice, and dirt that slides off a mountain is known as an avalanche. A mass of snow, rock, ice, soil, and other debris flows down a mountainside quickly during an avalanche dangerous.

To learn more about avalanche, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/28192597

#SPJ1

The statement "documents filed by both parties at the beginning of a lawsuit are called the pleadings" is true because, in a civil lawsuit, pleadings refer to the formal documents filed by the parties at the beginning of a case.

The correct answer is true.

These documents typically include the complaint filed by the plaintiff, which sets forth the claims being made against the defendant, and the defendant's answer, which responds to the allegations in the complaint and may include any affirmative defences or counterclaims the defendant wishes to make.

In addition to the complaint and answer, other pleadings may be filed as the case progresses, such as a reply by the plaintiff to any counterclaims made by the defendant or a motion to dismiss the case by either party. Pleadings play a critical role in shaping the direction of a case, as they provide the initial framework for the issues that will be litigated and the evidence that will be presented.

To know more about civil lawsuits, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30392587

#SPJ4

Answer:

The government had already tried hard to judge the middle road of the public benefit against industries or companies, but it has also figured out a way of developing this practice.

An example of this will be legislation financing charter schools, that in general education may be seen as better schools. If that is so, charter schools are generally of the public interest, thus allowing the small group of people who operate these charter schools (sometimes for profit) corporations to operate these schools and the government. They often work in charter schools.

Explanation:

Answer:

The government had already tried hard to judge the middle road of the public benefit against industries or companies, but it has also figured out a way of developing this practice.

An example of this will be legislation financing charter schools, that in general education may be seen as better schools. If that is so, charter schools are generally of the public interest, thus allowing the small group of people who operate these charter schools (sometimes for profit) corporations to operate these schools and the government. They often work in charter schools.

Explanation:

Explanation:

National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act)- 1935 specifies the free speech clause which specified that management has the right to express its opinions about unions as long as it doesn't threaten or promise favors to obtain anti-union actions. Labor-Management Relations Act (Taft-Hartley)- 1947 prohibits unfair labor practices by unions, such as coercing or preventing workers from exercising their freedom to join or not join a union or take part in union activities.

What was the purpose of the Taft-Hartley Act?

The Taft-Hartley Act also referred to as the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, is a federal legislation in the United States that limits the actions and authority of labor unions. when a business stops running before or during a labor conflict. The Taft-Hartley Act was primarily intended to safeguard workers from abusive employers.

National Labor Relations Act (Wagner Act)- 1935 specifies the free speech clause which specified that management has the right to express its opinions about unions as long as it doesn't threaten or promise favors to obtain anti-union actions. Labor-Management Relations Act (Taft-Hartley)- 1947 prohibits unfair labor practices by unions, such as coercing or preventing workers from exercising their freedom to join or not join a union or take part in union activities.

To find out more about the Taft-Hartley Act, check out:

https://brainly.com/question/10748899

#SPJ4

The judicial system contributes to the creation of laws. The meaning, character, and reach of the laws passed by the legislature are really determined by the court rulings. As these interpretations define the laws, the judiciary's understanding of the law amounts to lawmaking.

By defining a crucial judicial decision as one that "establishes a legal rule or principle that is employed to resolve future cases, thereby distinguishing itself from judgments doomed to spend eternity on the ash heap of legal history," they shorthanded the term importance to mean "having precedential value."

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court in the land and the only branch of the federal judiciary that the Constitution expressly mandates.

To know more about  judiciary, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/14328711

#SPJ4

Answer:

So hello ok you at lest confront herrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr then after that you should pull up to her house and get it but also take photos  of it  before touching it but if its gone then u should record microphone but put it somewhere she cant see it and tell her  its gone and tell her buy me another one if she refuse then you at least have evidence hope you get it back or its still there.

Explanation:

A motion for a(n) direct verdict, made by defense at the close of the plaintiff's case, asks a judge to enter verdict for the defendant before the defendant presents any evidence because there is no blank basis for the plaintiff's claim.

This motion asserts that even if the jury were to accept all the evidence presented by the plaintiff as true, it would not be sufficient to establish a valid claim or cause of action.

The purpose of this motion is to challenge the sufficiency of the plaintiff's evidence and to argue that, as a matter of law, the plaintiff has failed to meet their burden of proof. It is typically made when the defense believes that the plaintiff has not presented enough credible evidence or has failed to establish all the necessary elements of the claim.

In considering the motion, the judge reviews the evidence presented by the plaintiff and determines whether, when viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, it could reasonably support a verdict in their favor. If the judge concludes that no reasonable jury could find in favor of the plaintiff based on the evidence presented, the judge may grant the motion for a directed verdict, resulting in a judgment in favor of the defendant without the need for the defense to present its own evidence.

To know more about plaintiff's claim here

https://brainly.com/question/31945719

#SPJ4

Answer:

the principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that isfairly applied and enforced; the principle of government by law.

Answer: citizens cannot be held without legal action.