presidential elections between 1928 and 1952 revelared major shifts in polical aprty loyalities. anaylize both the reaons for these hcanges and their consequences during the period
The presidential elections between 1928 and 1952 in the United States saw major shifts in political party loyalties.
These changes were driven by a variety of factors and had significant consequences during the period.
One of the main reasons for the changes in political party loyalties during this period was the impact of the Great Depression. The stock market crash of 1929 led to widespread economic hardship and disillusionment with the Republican Party, which was seen as being closely tied to big business interests. This led to a shift in support towards the Democratic Party, which promised to address the economic issues facing ordinary Americans through the New Deal policies of President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Another factor contributing to the changes in political party loyalties during this period was the growing influence of African American voters. The Democratic Party, under Roosevelt's leadership, made a concerted effort to appeal to African American voters, who had previously been loyal to the Republican Party. This shift in support had significant consequences for the political landscape, as African American voters became a key constituency for the Democratic Party.
Overall, the changes in political party loyalties during the period between 1928 and 1952 were driven by a variety of factors, including economic hardship, shifting demographics, and changes in political leadership. These changes had significant consequences for the political landscape of the United States, as the Democratic Party emerged as a dominant political force and the Republican Party struggled to adapt to the changing political environment.
Learn more about business here:
https://brainly.com/question/15826604
#SPJ11
DWI Roadblocks and Checkpoints are periodically set up by law enforcement throughout the states. In "Brown Vs, Texas," the Supreme Court upheld their constitutionality based of three factors.
In "Brown v. Texas," the Court considered the Fourth Amendment rights of individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures.
The case involved two individuals who were stopped by police officers and asked to identify themselves, without any reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. The Court held that the stop and identification statute, under which the individuals were detained, violated the Fourth Amendment.
To determine the constitutionality of DWI roadblocks or checkpoints, the Supreme Court has generally considered three factors:
Purpose: The checkpoint must have a primary purpose related to public safety, such as detecting impaired drivers or verifying driver's licenses.
Location and Duration: The checkpoint's location and duration should be based on relevant factors, such as the history of alcohol-related incidents in the area and the effectiveness of the checkpoint.
Guidelines and Discretion: The checkpoint should be conducted pursuant to specific guidelines or protocols, minimizing the discretion of the officers on-site and reducing the potential for arbitrary or intrusive searches.
It's important to note that the specific details and guidelines surrounding DWI roadblocks and checkpoints can vary among states, as they may have their own laws and regulations. If you have concerns or questions about DWI roadblocks or checkpoints in your state, it's best to consult the specific laws and legal precedents within your jurisdiction.
Learn more about law enforcement here
https://brainly.com/question/31597958
#SPJ4
which cybercriminal activity refers to the act of luring internet users to bogus web sites?
The cybercriminal activity that refers to the act of luring internet users to bogus web sites is known as "phishing."
Phishing is a type of online scam that typically involves sending fraudulent emails or messages with the intention of tricking people into providing sensitive information such as login credentials, credit card details, or other personal information.
These emails often appear to be from a legitimate source, such as a bank or popular e-commerce site, and may contain links to fake websites that closely resemble the real thing.
Once the user enters their information on the bogus site, the cybercriminals can use it to steal their identity, make unauthorized purchases, or engage in other fraudulent activities. Phishing is a common form of cybercrime that can be difficult to detect and prevent, making it important for individuals to stay vigilant and take steps to protect their personal information online.
to learn more about phishing click here:
brainly.com/question/24156548
#SPJ11
Which consequences can victims of identity theft face? check all that apply.which person is a victim of identity theft?
1. difficulty getting a loan or credit card
2. an increase in debt
3. difficulty keeping assets
4. a loss of money
5. difficulty landing a new job
Victims of identity theft can face a variety of consequences, including difficulty getting a loan or credit card, an increase in debt, difficulty keeping assets, a loss of money, and difficulty landing a new job.
Identity theft occurs when someone steals another person's personal information and uses it for their own gain. This can result in the victim experiencing financial losses, which can affect their ability to obtain credit, maintain assets, and secure employment. For example, if a victim's credit score is negatively impacted by the identity theft, they may struggle to get approved for loans or credit cards. Additionally, the victim may face increased debt if the thief opens accounts or makes purchases in their name. The victim may also have difficulty keeping their assets if the thief gains access to their bank accounts or other financial information. Finally, the victim may experience a loss of money if the thief drains their accounts or makes fraudulent purchases. victims of identity theft can face a range of negative consequences, including financial losses and difficulties obtaining credit, keeping assets, and finding employment. It is important for individuals to take steps to protect their personal information and monitor their accounts for signs of fraudulent activity.
to know about identity theft visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19215076
#SPJ11
A contract was entered between Fash and Gaya (a lunatic who recently escaped from the Aro Psychiatric Hospital). The agreement was for Fash to supply Gaya with 1 cow, 3 goats and 6 chickens for his homecoming party. Fash supplied the items, all of which were used by Gaya, but Gaya has refused to pay. Can Fash enforce the contract?
Answer: Fash cannot
Explanation:
When entering a contract with someone, both parties must be of sound mind to prove that indeed they were mentally capable of being able fulfil their role in the contract.
Gaya was a lunatic who had just escaped a psychiatric hospital. He therefore was not of a sound mind when he signed the contract so Fash cannot enforce the contract because it was not even a contract in the first place as one of the parties was incapable of getting into a contract.
When you recite the pledge of Allegiance, you are promising to uphold American ideals and values -- liberty, justice and equal rights for all. Explain how these ideals and values are reflected in your everyday life.
Answer:
Liberty in this context means "freedom". The freedom to do what you like (without breaking the law). Justice is an important hallmark of our democracy. Justice implies that whosoever is charged gets equal treatment from all members of society. It also implies that you're innocent until proven guilty, and are guaranteed due process (states must respect the rights of all individuals) and deliver impartial treatment. This leads to equal rights under the Constitution.
There is a good reflection of these three core ideals when you decide what career you want to take. Also, what religion, if any, you choose to practice. Moreover, the freedom of speech allows you to speak about your political affiliation without getting censored or even killed (compared to other systems of government). Finally, if you get a ticket, and did not commit a violation, then you are allowed to uphold your rights and are presumed innocent every step of the way.
Explanation:
I hope this helps. Tweak it a bit, to fit your style.
Select the correct answer.
Who establishes the National Guard units?
Ο Α.
Governor
O B.
President
O C. Vice-President
D. Department of Defense
Answer:
The CORRECT answer is A. Governor
Explanation:
The National Guard was put in place under Title 32 Full-Time National Guard Duty. Title 32 activation can only be done by the President or SECDEF with the approval and consent of the state Governor. The National Guard is federally funded, but command and control remains with the State Governor through his Adjutant General.
Hopefully this helps!!
Let me know if you still need help or if you have any questions!
Which of the following explanations for United States foreign policy debates after September 11, 2001, could the situation described in the excerpt best be used to support?
Russell Hardin, political scientist, "Civil Liberties in the Era of Mass Terrorism," Journal of Ethics, 2004
The reasons for US foreign policy debates are the contentious national security efforts to combat terrorism. The choice B is correct.
U.S. foreign policy places a strong emphasis on safeguarding human rights and promoting democracy and freedom around the world. The three most important objectives of American foreign policy are world peace, prosperity, and security. Security, or the safeguarding of American interests and citizens, is a constant concern; however, over its long history, the United States has attempted to achieve security in various ways.
Under the Constitution, the Leader of the US decides U.S. international strategy. The President's chief foreign affairs advisor is the Secretary of State, who was appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.
Learn more about U.S.foreign policy :
brainly.com/question/27710490
#SPJ4
Complete question as follows :
Which of the following explanations for United States foreign policy debates after September 11, 2001, could the situation described in the excerpt best be used to support?
A. Some people asserted that the United States should return to isolationism.
B. The national security efforts to prevent terrorism were controversial.
C. The decision to go to war in Iraq deeply divided the American people.
D. Some people argued that fossil fuel dependence undercut national security.
service of process is the process of obtaining information from an opposing party before trial.
Discovery is the procedure used to gather evidence from the defense or from witnesses before a trial.
What is Discovery?This is the official process by which the parties exchange details regarding the witnesses and evidence they'll use at trial. The parties can learn via discovery what evidence might be used before the trial starts.
The exchange of information between the parties in a court matter through discovery is a formal process. This includes details about the potential witnesses and the evidence that will be used in court. Its goal is to inform the parties of the potential evidence that will be used in court.
To know more about Discovery, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28943247
#SPJ1
1. When driving, you need to focus which percentage of your attention to the road and driving your vehicle?
52%
80%
100%
110%
When driving, you need to focus 100 percentage of your attention to the road and driving your vehicle.
You endanger your life and the lives of others every time you turn your attention away from the road, even for a few moment. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, distracted driving-related accidents resulted in at least 5,500 fatalities and about 450,000 injuries on American roadways in 2009.
Federal safety officials, though, think the figures are significantly higher since many local law enforcement agencies don't regularly include distracted drivers in crash data.
According to the Governors Highway Safety Association, operating a vehicle is a surprisingly complex task. Distractions are thought to be a factor in anywhere between 15% and 25% of crashes.
Barbara Harsha, the organization's executive director, agrees. It demands all of your focus.
Hence, option C is correct.
To learn more about Distracted Driving here
https://brainly.com/question/9637211
#SPJ2
if gina and liz reach a verbal agreement in mediation what would happen next
Answer:
See Explanation.
Explanation:
There's a lot to be done after mediation, and even though you need to review your financial agreement with an accountant and file your marital settlement agreement, you will never have to appear in court.
if a state appraisal regulatory agency revokes an appraiser's certification, the agency should notify the asc:
true or false
Indeed, the statement "if a state appraisal regulatory agency revokes an appraiser's certification, the agency should notify the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC)" is accurate.
State appraisal regulatory agencies are responsible for overseeing real estate appraisal licensing at the state level, while the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) serves as a federal agency that monitors and supervises these state appraisal boards. The ASC ensures that state boards comply with consistent standards and regulations in their appraisal regulation activities.
Thus, when a state appraisal regulatory agency revokes an appraiser's certification, it is required to inform the ASC to ensure proper communication and compliance at the federal level.
To know more about agency, visit:
brainly.com/question/30556993
#SPJ11
Why were the Airbus actions a violation of the US Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act?
The Airbus actions violated the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act due to bribery of foreign officials and accounting irregularities.
The Airbus actions were considered a violation of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) due to several reasons. The FCPA is a US law that prohibits bribery of foreign officials and requires accurate record-keeping by companies with securities listed on US stock exchanges. Here's why the Airbus actions were deemed a violation:
Bribery: Airbus was found to have engaged in corrupt practices by offering and paying bribes to foreign officials and intermediaries to secure business contracts and gain competitive advantages. These bribes were intended to influence the decision-making of foreign officials, which directly contravenes the FCPA's anti-bribery provisions.Accounting Irregularities: The FCPA also requires accurate and transparent financial reporting. Airbus was discovered to have engaged in accounting irregularities, including misrepresenting payments, disguising bribes as legitimate business expenses, and maintaining inadequate internal controls. These actions not only violated the FCPA's accounting provisions but also undermined the integrity of financial statements and hindered proper corporate governance.Jurisdictional Reach: The FCPA applies to any company or individual, regardless of their nationality, if they engage in corrupt practices within the jurisdiction of the United States. Since Airbus is a global company with a significant presence in the US, its actions fell within the FCPA's jurisdiction.In summary, the Airbus actions violated the FCPA through bribery, accounting irregularities, and the jurisdictional reach of the law. These violations undermine the principles of fair competition, transparency, and ethical business practices that the FCPA aims to uphold.
Know more about FCPA here:
https://brainly.com/question/30626255
#SPJ8
Disclosure is
O a rule or policy determined by a federal agency that applies to and will be enforced on a bank or creditor
O a legal process for renegotiating or annulling a contract with a financial business such as a bank or creditor
O payment provided to a bank or creditor for specific tasks relating to opening and maintaining a financial account
• documentation where a bank or creditor provides all important details, requirements, and policies for their accounts
Disclosure is legal process for renegotiating or annulling a contract with a financial business such as a bank or creditor.
What does the term disclosure mean?The phase of the legal procedure known as disclosure requires each party to the lawsuit to reveal any documents that might be deemed important if the case goes to trial. After each party has given their opening statement in the case, we usually go on to this stage.
Disclosure in accounting is an additional piece of information that is included with a company's financial statements and typically serves to explain actions that have had a substantial impact on the company's bottom line. Making educated decisions is made simpler for investors by increased transparency in the management and operations of the corporations. Additionally, it lessens the chance that investors' money may be manipulated or used improperly.
To learn more about lawsuit, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18273856
#SPJ1
Which responsibility of citizens in a democracy do the media best support?
A Making informed decisions when voting
8. Serving onjuries
Paying taxes
Running for local office
Answer:
A. Making informed decisions when voting.
Explanation:
This question as well as the answer choices are oddly worded. However, the media is responsible for informing the public. While they are often biased and sometimes inaccurately representing the state of affairs, they inform the public nonetheless. Serving on juries and paying taxes don't really have anything to do with the media's duties. You could say running for local office, but the media is truly just an information source. While they may support someone running for office, they may also oppose and bash them. Therefore, they are most qualified to aid in the public making informed decisions when they vote.
In New York City, the speed limit is ________ except where otherwise is posted
a. 25 mph
b. 26 mph
c. 27 mph
In New York City, the speed limit is a) 25 mph except where otherwise is posted.
This means that drivers must adhere to the speed limit of 25 mph in most areas of the city, unless there is a sign indicating a different speed limit. This is an effort to increase safety on the roads and reduce accidents, particularly in densely populated areas where pedestrians and cyclists are present.
It is important for drivers to pay close attention to speed limit signs and adjust their speed accordingly. Speeding not only puts the driver at risk, but also endangers the lives of others on the road. In addition, drivers who exceed the speed limit may face fines and other penalties, including points on their driver's license.
Overall, following the posted speed limit in New York City and elsewhere is crucial for promoting safety on the roads and avoiding unnecessary accidents. It is important for all drivers to take responsibility for their actions and make safety a top priority while behind the wheel.
Therefore, the correct answer is a. 25 mph
Learn more about speed limit here: https://brainly.com/question/28317028
#SPJ11
Consider systematic discrimination, contextual discrimination, institutional and individual acts of discrimination. Which do you believe is the most problematic for the criminal justice system as we know it today? Discuss.
Answer:
Systemic discrimination
Explanation:
Considering the comprehensive concept that systematic discrimination addresses, we can consider it as the most problematic for the criminal justice system we know, as it can be included in the most diverse situations and occasions, promoting many injustices and problems for racialized people. This is because systematic discrimination promotes patterns of behavior applicable in various elements of society that allow an organization, or system or a group of people to create disadvantages and problems for people outside the desired standards. These disadvantages can be criminal and promote suffering and even harm the victims.
Jake, the CEO of WinWest Inc., launches a new product. Despite the product's persistent failure, he is unwilling to withdraw it from the market because he believes that the product will be profitable in the long term. This scenario is an example of _____.
This scenario is an example of "escalation of commitment" or "sunk cost fallacy." It is the situation where where an individual or organization continues to invest resources.
The term "escalation of commitment" refers to a situation where an individual or organization continues to invest resources, such as time, money, and effort, into a failing project or course of action despite evidence indicating its lack of success. This commitment escalation often occurs due to the fear of losing previous investments or a belief that future outcomes will improve.
In the given scenario, Jake, the CEO of WinWest Inc., launches a new product that consistently fails in the market. However, he is unwilling to withdraw it because he believes that it will eventually become profitable in the long term. This demonstrates an escalation of commitment because Jake is persisting with the failing product despite negative feedback or evidence.
The underlying rationale behind this behavior can be attributed to the sunk cost fallacy. The sunk cost fallacy occurs when individuals or organizations consider past investments (sunk costs) in a project as a reason to continue investing, even when it no longer makes logical sense. They perceive the investment as irrecoverable and believe that by continuing to invest, they can somehow recoup or justify their previous losses.
In Jake's case, he may feel that withdrawing the product from the market would mean accepting the loss of resources, such as time, money, and effort already invested. By holding onto the belief that the product will eventually become profitable, he falls into the trap of the sunk cost fallacy, leading him to continue investing in a failing venture.
It's important to recognize the sunk cost fallacy and understand that future decisions should be based on the product's current performance, market feedback, and potential for success, rather than past investments that cannot be recovered. Evaluating the situation objectively and making informed decisions based on present circumstances can help avoid the escalation of commitment and mitigate the negative impact on the organization.
To know more about escalation of commitment, click here:https://brainly.com/question/30482641
#SPJ11
You're a criminal mastermind who has broken into a gun manufacturing plant and wants to interfere with gun production in such a way that
the guns produced in the factory won't be traceable. What are you looking to sabotage?
A laser cutting device
Answer:
A steel die stamping device
Explanation:
constitutionally established guarantees that protect citizens, opinions, and propertyagainst arbitrary government interference are known as:
These guarantees are known as civil rightsare protections that are established to ensure that citizens are guaranteed certain rights.
Civil rights are protections that are established to ensure that citizens are guaranteed certain rights, including the right to life, liberty, and property, as well as freedom of speech and assembly, protection against discrimination, and the right to due process. They are designed to prevent government interference with fundamental rights and freedoms, especially those that are essential to a democratic society. Civil rights also provide a platform for citizens to express their opinions without fear of retribution or censorship, and to enjoy the same privileges regardless of their personal characteristics. Civil rights are essential for a democratic society to function, as they ensure that all citizens are treated equally and enjoy their inalienable rights.
Learn more about civil rights. here:
https://brainly.com/question/1142564
#SPJ4
After reading the cases African American Cases--Part I--Brown Trilogy Turning Point and Part II--Historical Cases and watching the video "The Road to Brown". tell whether or not the legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) today. why and why not?
The legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on Supreme Court of the United States today because it is seen that The 6–3 higher measure -conservative Supreme Court is known to have stepped out with a demographically and culturally altering America.
What is a political Conservative?Conservatism in the United States is seen as a form of a political and social philosophy that is known to be based on traditionalism as well as republicanism, and hindered by the federal governmental power in association to U.S. states.
Note that The legacy of Brown Trilogy is under threat from the new conservative majority on Supreme Court of the United States today because it is seen that The 6–3 higher measure -conservative Supreme Court is known to have stepped out with a demographically and culturally altering America.
Learn more about Supreme Court from
https://brainly.com/question/15111973
#SPJ1
What determines how a candidate is chosen when no candidate wins a majority of
votes in a primary election?
federal law
the United States Constitution
Ostate law
local laws
Answer:
majority of votes in a primary election
Explanation:
Answer:
What determines how a candidate is chosen when no candidate wins a majority of votes in a primary election?
the United States Constitution
federal law
local laws
state law
The answer is United States Constitution
Explanation:
What is the main purpose of debate?
The main purpose of the debate is to win over the arguments given.
What's a debate?Debate is a discussion or exchange of opinions by each participant on a subject matter, where each participant may provide reasons or arguments to defend his opinion.
Some of the debate functions are:
Developing speaking skills in expressing opinions well on pro and con conflicts.Build analytical power, related to the skills to listen and understand the opponent's debate.Growing the ability to convey arguments logically with polite language and gestures.Build skills in critical thinking.Learn to think analytically and systematically.Learn to express thoughts on others.Increase self-confidence.Learn more about purpose of a debate before an election here :
https://brainly.com/question/29550770
#SPJ4
Looking back at history, women often had very different protection under men, depending on which government ruled. Based on the origins of human right below, did it apply to women? Explain why and how in 150 to 200 words.
Women often had very different protection from men, they are dependent on their husbands as well as fathers before marriage, and their influence was limited to the boundaries of the home.
What is a human right?Human rights are some of the rights which are provided to every human despite of any discrimination based on age, gender, caste or religion. These rights include the right to have property, the right to freedom, and the right to express.
Historians speculate that Mycenae or Crete may have had matriarchal societies throughout the Bronze Age. Only the 18th century, with the beginning of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution, can be used to discuss the claim of the rights of women.
Learn more about women, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3451600
#SPJ1
In your own opinion, is it necessary to create laws to instill discipline among us filipinos?
Colonialism and endless war, however, were the real cause of Filipino indolence, and may be considered as the root of all Filipino bad habits and lack of discipline.
The Philippines' martial law can be imposed by whom?
The President of the Republic may impose martial law for a maximum of 60 days in circumstances of insurrection and invasion when it is necessary for the sake of public safety, according to Article VII, Section 18 of the Constitution of 1987. The Armed Forces of the Philippines and its forerunner organizations have historically imposed martial law.
What does a Filipino's lack of discipline look like?
The disciplinelessness of the Filipino comprises a number of related traits. We have a carefree and relaxed attitude toward time and space, which shows up in our lack of focus and compulsiveness, as well as in our bad time management and procrastination.
Learn more about Filipino character
brainly.com/question/29798458
#SPJ1
why am i going to prison i am only 17 years old i got 20 years
A 17-year-old person can be sentenced to 20 years for committing one of the most serious crimes.
What is a heinous crime?A heinous crime is a misconduct that involves some form of personal injury or death committed by a minor who has passed the age of discretion.
Some of the most prominent crimes that attract a long sentence in jail include:
M.rderForcible r.peS.xual assaultR.bberyFirst-degree ars.n.Thus, a 17-year-old person can be sentenced to 20 years for committing one of the most serious crimes, especially when it results in serious injury or death.
Learn more about serious crimes at https://brainly.com/question/25973385
The state tax incentive is an example of":
Answer:
mortgage interest deduction
Which of the following is a characteristic of a low-risk driving environment?
O a) Heavy and unpredictable traffic flow
Ob) A speed limit of 55 mph
O c) Hills and curves
Od) None of the above
Answer:
Od) None of the above
Explanation:
Speed limit of 55 mph does seem reasonable, but even that is too fast on many roads, especially narrow ones.
which amendment to the u.s. constitution ensures protection to both honest and dishonest speakers.
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ensures protection to both honest and dishonest speakers.
What does the First Amendment do ?The First Amendment of the United States guarantees citizens the safeguards of freedom of speech, religious orientation, press, collective congregation and petition. This amendment is a foundation for American democracy, protecting individuals from the intrusive censorship or punishment from state bureaucracy should they choose to express their opinions or ideas without fear.
The safeguarding of this amendment encompasses all expressions of communication such as written or spoken words, creative artistry, sound, and symbolized impressions.
Find out more on the Fifth Amendment at https://brainly.com/question/29528178
#SPJ1
in tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as:
In tort law, the failure of one party to act or intervene in a certain situation is known as "omission.
"Definition: Omission, in legal terms, is a term used to describe the failure to act when action is required. Omission means failing to act in a situation that calls for action. The person who is supposed to act in the given situation fails to act and hence the consequences of such inaction are faced. In tort law, the term omission is used to refer to the failure of one party to act or intervene in a given situation.
However, it is important to note that the omission is only punishable in law if the person had a duty to act or intervene, and if their inaction resulted in harm to another person. Thus, if a person has no duty to act or intervene, then they cannot be held liable for their inaction.
Learn more about tort law here:https://brainly.com/question/28213050
#SPJ11