Answers
Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln eventually became allies in the fight to end slavery in the United States, despite their initial disagreements and differences. What factors contributed to their eventual collaboration, and why was their partnership so crucial in the fight against slavery?
Initially, Douglass and Lincoln had very different views on the best way to end slavery. Douglass was an outspoken abolitionist who believed in immediate emancipation and full civil rights for African Americans. Lincoln, on the other hand, was more cautious and believed in a gradual approach to ending slavery, as he was focused on preserving the Union and avoiding a civil war.
However, as the Civil War progressed and the Union began to gain ground, Lincoln began to see the importance of abolition as a means of weakening the Confederacy and securing victory. Meanwhile, Douglass continued to use his influence as a prominent African American leader to push for emancipation and equal rights for all.
Their eventual collaboration was crucial in several ways. First, Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation was heavily influenced by Douglass's advocacy and pressure, as well as by the changing political climate of the war. Second, Douglass's support helped to rally African American troops to fight for the Union and strengthened the cause of abolition within the Union ranks. Finally, their partnership helped to lay the groundwork for the eventual passage of the 13th Amendment, which officially abolished slavery in the United States.
In the end, Douglass and Lincoln's partnership was a testament to the power of collaboration and compromise in the face of significant differences. Despite their disagreements, they were able to find common ground and work together towards a shared goal of ending slavery and securing civil rights for African Americans. Their example is a powerful reminder of the importance of building bridges and working together towards a better future.
Related Questions
How did people get their property in the frontier of New Mexico?
Answers
explain 5 ways in which the ancient Greeks contributed to world civilization
Answers
The Greeks made important contributions to philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, and medicine. Literature and theatre was an important aspect of Greek culture and influenced modern drama. The Greeks were known for their sophisticated
sculpture and architecture.
Western Philosophy.
Socrates.
Olympics. The Olympic games first began on the island of “Pelops” in the western Peloponnese in 776 BCE.
Marathon.
Alarm Clock.
Umbrellas.
Best Bangla Newspaper directory?
Answers
The best Bangla newspaper directory offers a centralized and reliable platform for accessing a variety of reputable Bangla newspapers.
What is the Best Bangla Newspaper directory?The best Bangla newspaper directory is a comprehensive online platform that provides a curated list of reputable and widely read Bangla newspapers, allowing users to access various news sources in the Bengali language.
It offers a convenient and centralized resource for individuals seeking reliable and up-to-date news coverage on a wide range of topics, including politics, business, entertainment, sports, and more.
The directory assists users in navigating through the diverse landscape of Bangla newspapers, ensuring easy access to trusted sources for news and information in the Bangla language.
Learn more about Newspaper directory on:
https://brainly.com/question/26510825
#SPJ1
What two provision of the Constitution of 1869 seem to contradict each other?
Answers
Two provisions of the Constitution of 1869 seem to contradict each other was of anti-slavery rights and the right to vote.
What is Constitution?A state's constitution serves as its rulebook. It lays out the guiding ideals that society is governed by. It explains the link between the state's primary agencies and the agencies themselves.
In the constitution that was created in 1869, It was told that the people will be made free. But at the same time, there was a fight that was going on over the rights and the votes that they were to be able to cast.
Learn more about Constitution, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
Please help me!
How was Kissinger used by Nixon in regards to international relations?
A. Kissinger lived in the Soviet Union as a permanent diplomat and ambassador
B. Kissinger held a number of secret talks with leaders of Communist countries
C. Kissinger took control of the army in Vietnam and trained the South Vietnamese troops
D. Kissinger supplied the main spy network providing information to Nixon
Answers
Nixon's successor, Gerald Ford, appointed Kissinger to the positions of Secretary of State and National Security Advisor, respectively. The final remaining member of the Nixon administration's Cabinet will be George Shultz, who will pass away in February 2021. Kissinger.
What did Kissinger do for Nixon?Similar to the friendships between Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House or Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry Hopkins, Nixon and Kissinger had an extraordinarily tight relationship. The State Department played a supporting role in the formulation of foreign policy in each of the three instances. Kissinger and Nixon had a tendency for secrecy and carried out a number of "backchannel" conversations, such as those through the Soviet Ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Dobrygin, that excluded State Department experts.Kissinger, a Realpolitik advocate, was a key player in shaping American foreign policy from 1969 and 1977. His détente approach was expanded during that time. This strategy was critical in 1971 negotiations with Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai and resulted in a considerable reduction in US-Soviet tensions. An anti-Soviet Sino-American strategic alignment was formed as a result of the negotiations, which brought about a closer relationship between the United States and China. For his role in bringing about a truce and the American withdrawal from Vietnam, he shared the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize with Lê c Th. However, the cease-fire was short-lived.Th refused the award and Kissinger showed extreme ambivalence about it, giving his prize money to a good cause, skipping the award ceremony, and later expressing a desire to have his prize medal returned. The hotly contested National Security Study Memorandum 200 was overseen by Kissinger in 1974 while serving as National Security Advisor.To Learn more About Nixon's successor, Refer To:
https://brainly.com/question/10154505
#SPJ1
What is the
Federal
government
offering, and
what are they
requiring?
Answers
Let assume the context is educational sector, the Federal government's role in education is to provide funding, set standards and requirements, and enforce civil rights protections to promote high-quality education for all students.
What is the Federal government offering in this sector?The Federal government in the United States offers a range of programs and initiatives in the education sector, with the aim of promoting high-quality education for all students.
Some of the key programs and requirements include:
Funding for K-12 Education: The Federal government provides funding to support K-12 education through programs such as Title I, which provides additional funding to schools with high numbers of students.College Financial Aid: The Federal government also provides financial aid to help students afford college, including grants, loans, and work-study programs. The Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) is a requirement for many types of financial aid.Accountability and Standards: The Federal government requires states to set academic standards for what students should know and be able to do in each grade level, and to administer assessments to measure student progress etc.Read more about education sector
brainly.com/question/8461796
#SPJ1
Lincoln issued this order in 1863 when the war was still going on, is this a good war strategy? Why or why not?
Answers
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Lincoln issued this order in 1863 when the war was still going on. Is this a good war strategy?
First, let's clarify the context. Here we are talking about the Emancipation Proclamation issued by the United States President Abraham Lincoln in 1863, in the middle of the Civil War.
Was this a good war strategy?
It was not the best was strategy because the war was not decided yet. Both, Confederates and the Union Army had their chances to win the American Civil War at that moment.
However, Lincoln saw the Emancipation Proclamation of January 1863 as a way to exert some kind of military and moral pressure over the Confederated states, sending the clear message that the President of the Union was confident enough on winning the war and let the Confederates know what would happen when the war was over.
Let's have in mind that the Proclamation was valid to free black slaves in the Confederate states in the South.
Six months later, in July 1863, the Union Army would win the Battle of Gettysburg, one of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War. That victory gave the Union a considerable advantage in the war scenario.
Why was slavery the path chosen
Answers
The most basic purpose of slavery is to rid oneself of work and force the hideous labor upon someone else. Since the time of our more primitive era, societies have taken slaves from war and conquest, and forced them to do their workaday tasks
I need help giveing brainlist
Answers
Answer: do u still need help? cause i can help
Explanation:
How would this change Japan economically?
Answers
Answer:
How did Japan change economically?
Rapid growth and structural change characterized Japan's two periods of economic development since 1868. ...
Explanation:
In the 1930s, the Japanese economy suffered less from the Great Depression than most industrialized nations, its GDP expanding at a rapid rate of 5% per year.
Why did people from Indigenous cultures not claim land?
The land was too expensive to claim.
They did not believe in private property.
The land was controlled by Indigenous leaders.
They believed European settlers owned the land.
Answers
Answer:
this means that Indigenous lands could be occupied and used by the Crown (or whomever the Crown handed control to) as long as they were not altered or damaged.
Explanation:
What 2 factors led to the growth of villages?
Answers
Answer:
the two factors lead to growth of village are;
1. public participation
2.urbanization
two of the biggest challenges facing the newly independent nation of Mexico in 1821
Answers
Answer:
Economic instability: The country's economy was in disarray, with high levels of debt and a lack of infrastructure. The newly formed government had to establish new institutions and implement economic reforms to promote growth and stability.
Political instability: The new government struggled to establish its authority, and political instability persisted. There were disagreements among political factions, and some regions challenged the central government's legitimacy, leading to conflicts and uprisings. This instability was compounded by the fact that Mexico was a diverse nation with multiple ethnic and cultural groups, making it difficult to achieve national unity.
In the Narrative of life of Olaudah Equiano How is decent self with on plantations
Answers
Equiano returned to England and became an outspoken abolitionist. He delivered a speech condemning the cruelty of British slave owners.
How did Equiano escape slavery?
Equiano was eventually enslaved by two other people. He received some education during his enslavement, which ended when he purchased his emancipation in 1766. Equiano became an active abolitionist after settling in England, protesting and lecturing against the cruelty of British enslavers in Jamaica.
Equiano returned to England and became an outspoken abolitionist. He delivered a speech condemning the cruelty of British slave owners. He was a vocal opponent of the English slave trade. He worked to rehabilitate freed slaves.
Therefore, He was a vocal opponent of the English slave trade. He worked to rehabilitate freed slaves.
Learn more about Olaudah Equiano from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/30039541
#SPJ1
In the 1844 election, the phrase “Fifty-Four Forty or Fight!” referred to
the number of representatives in Congress.
the growing US economy in the West.
the desired boundary line in the North.
the threat of war with American Indians.
Answers
Answer: c
Explanation: because
Who accidentally started the
French and Indian War which
turned into a global conflict?
A. Thomas Jefferson
B. The Native Americans
C. The French
D. George Washington
Answers
Answer:
George Washington
Explanation:
In 1754, Washington led the English when they approached French Ensign Joseph Coulon de Jumonville.When Washington and Tanacharison’s forces reached Jumonville’s camp, they attacked, killing Jumonville and several of his soldiers, and taking others prisoner. While the question of who fired first remains in dispute—according to one Mingo warrior, it was Washington himself. His actions led to the French and Indian war, which turned into a global conflict...
all were true about prison camps during the civil war except
Answers
All were true abοut prisοn camps during the civil war except they were prοvided sufficient ratiοn cοnsisting οf nutrients and meat. Thus, οptiοn 2 is cοrrect.
What is American Civil War?The United States οf America (the Uniοn) and eleven Sοuthern states that split frοm the Uniοn and became the Cοnfederate States οf America engaged in a majοr cοnflict frοm 1861 tο 1865. Slavery was the main reasοn fοr the war because the Cοnfederacy wanted tο keep the practice while the Uniοn wanted tο end it. Ecοnοmic, pοlitical, and sοcial differences between the Nοrth and Sοuth alsο cοntributed tο the οutbreak οf war.
An estimated 620,000 sοldiers perished in οne οf the deadliest cοnflicts in American histοry, the Civil War.
To know more about American Civil War, visit:
brainly.com/question/28815289
#SPJ1
All were true abοut prisοn camps during the civil war except:
[Select all that apply]
Prisοn camps during the Civil War were pοtentially mοre dangerοus and mοre terrifying than the battles themselves.They were prοvided sufficient ratiοn cοnsisting οf nutrients and meat.56,000 men died in prisοn camps οver the cοurse οf the war, accοunting fοr rοughly 10% οf the war's tοtal death tοll and exceeding American cοmbat lοsses in Wοrld War I, Kοrea, and Vietnam. There were simply tοο many prisοners and nοt enοugh fοοd, clοthing, medicine, οr tents tο gο arοund.In the 1800s most states have laws that prevented women from
Answers
the religious gatherings that took place during the second great awakening were called _meetings
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
"revival meetings" or "camp meetings."
Sara Sees Red ,the author compares Sara's legs to rubber .
Answers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
her legs bent at the pressure of her weight because of her fear.
3. How did the revolution exert power and influence over so many people,
including many educated and middle class people like Satrapi's parents?
you think
Why did so many people leave after the revolution? Why do
Marji's parents.send her off to Austria while they stay in Tehran? Why don't
they leave/escape as well?
Answers
Marji and her family are severely impacted by the Iranian Revolution since they backed the uprising but were shocked when a fundamentalist Islamic dictatorship came to power.
How did the revolution affect Marjane Satrapi?
Marji and her family are terrified by the irate protests during the Iranian Revolution of 1979 because they worry for their safety. Marji's parents are held captive by the army for many hours before to the Shah's fall, and her father has his camera's film removed.
The moment the revolutionaries took control in 1979, the Family Protection Law was put on hold. That implied that men may once more simply mail their wives a divorce notice. Women lost their parental rights. Men may take as many temporary wives as they desired in addition to several permanent spouses.
Then, while Iran and Iraq were at war, Marji's daily existence turned into one of bloodshed. The Iranians were left on their own to defend their friends and family against the bombs and other forms of open brutality. Many unfortunate people suffered the loss of both their possessions and their close friends and family.
Learn more about Marjane Satrapi:
https://brainly.com/question/30233477
#SPJ9
ia history- To What Extent Did Johnsons Policy of VietnamizationAffect Vietnam During the Cold War?
Answers
Johnson's policy of Vietnamization, which aimed to reduce American troop levels in Vietnam by gradually handing over combat operations to the South Vietnamese army, had a significant impact on Vietnam during the Cold War. It increased the South Vietnamese army's size and self-confidence, but it also contributed to the country's instability and increased the fighting between the Vietnamese. However, the South Vietnamese military was eventually overwhelmed, and the Communist North won the war in 1975.
During the Cold War, Johnson's policy of Vietnamization affected Vietnam to a significant degree. Vietnamization, which was announced in 1969, sought to reduce American troop levels in Vietnam by gradually handing over combat operations to the South Vietnamese army. The United States' failure to win the war had left its citizens tired and the country's economy and military strained.
Johnson hoped that Vietnamization would provide an opportunity for the United States to gracefully leave the conflict while still preserving South Vietnam's independence and preventing a Communist takeover.Johnson's policy of Vietnamization had a significant impact on Vietnam's history during the Cold War. To begin with, it increased South Vietnam's army and increased their self-confidence.
he South Vietnamese army, trained by American military advisors, was given more authority and weaponry, which increased their ability to fight the Vietcong. South Vietnamese soldiers, on the other hand, were frequently ill-equipped and not properly trained to take on the Vietcong's guerrilla tactics, which resulted in many military and civilian casualties. Furthermore, the policy of Vietnamization increased the fighting between the Vietnamese.
The policy of Vietnamization fostered resentment among South Vietnamese soldiers who believed that they were being left to fight on their own against an extremely organized Vietcong, and this contributed to the country's instability, and the conflict continued well after the United States' departure. However, the South Vietnamese military was eventually overwhelmed, and the Communist North won the war in 1975.
For more such questions on Cold War, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/25774915
#SPJ8
Name two implements used for each of the following farm operations: (i) land preparation; (ii) planting; (iii) harvesting; (iv) crop processing. (5 marks
Answers
Two implements used for each of the following farm operations:
Land Preparation:
Tractor: The tractor is a versatile and commonly used farm implement for land preparation. It is equipped with various attachments such as plows, harrows, cultivators, and disc harrows. Tractors provide the power needed to pull these implements and perform tasks like plowing, tilling, leveling, and seedbed preparation.
Harrow: Harrows are implements with multiple spikes, discs, or blades that are dragged across the soil surface to break up clods, level the ground, and remove weeds. They help prepare the soil for planting by creating a finer seedbed and improving soil aeration.
Planting:
Seed Drill: A seed drill is a machine used for precise seeding of crops. It allows farmers to plant seeds at a consistent depth and spacing, ensuring uniform germination and optimal plant growth. Seed drills typically have seed hoppers, metering mechanisms, and coulters to create furrows and deposit seeds in the soil.
Transplanter: Transplanters are implements used to transfer young seedlings from nurseries to the field. They have mechanisms that dig holes, place seedlings at the correct depth, and cover the roots with soil. Transplanting ensures proper spacing and reduces competition among plants for resources.
Harvesting:
Combine Harvester: A combine harvester, often called a combine, is a multifunctional machine used to harvest grain crops. It cuts the crop, separates the grain from the straw, and collects it in a hopper while discarding the remaining plant material. Combine harvesters increase efficiency by combining multiple steps in the harvesting process.
Handheld Sickles or Scythes: Handheld sickles or scythes are manual tools used for harvesting crops such as wheat, barley, or rice. These traditional implements have curved or straight blades that are used to cut the stems close to the ground. Hand harvesting is labor-intensive but suitable for small-scale farming or areas with difficult terrain.
Crop Processing:
Thresher: A thresher is a machine used to separate grains from harvested crops such as wheat, rice, or maize. It typically consists of a rotating drum or cylinder that beats or rubs the crop, separating the grain from the straw. Threshers save time and effort compared to manual threshing methods.
Milling Machine: Milling machines are used for processing grains into flour or meal. They grind the harvested crop into fine particles by crushing, grinding, or rolling. These machines are vital in transforming crops like wheat, corn, or rice into usable products for food production. Milling machines can range from small-scale, manual mills to large-scale automated systems.
These implements mentioned for each farm operation are commonly used in agricultural practices. However, it's important to note that specific implements and machinery may vary depending on factors such as crop type, farm size, technological advancements, and regional practices.
For more questions on farm
https://brainly.com/question/27122656
#SPJ8
The Gilded Age was a time of economic . While a small percentage of Americans , the rest of the population owned a percentage of the nations wealth. The number of railroad miles increased rapidly, but in railroads led directly to the Panic of 1873.
Answers
The Gilded Age was a time of economic growth. While a small percentage of Americans lived in wealth, the rest of the population owned a small percentage of the nations wealth. The number of railroad miles increased rapidly, but in railroads led directly to the Panic of 1873.
What was the gilded age?The gilded age was the period that can be said to have been the age of economic prosperity in the United States. This was the period where the people experienced rapid industrialization in the nation and there was a great deal of migration in the nation.
During this age, there was very little regulation by the United States powers hence the wealthy in the society were able to accumulate a lot of wealth in the country. Only a small percentage of the citizens were wealthy. The rest only owned a small percentage of the nations wealth.
Read more on the gilded age here: https://brainly.com/question/1577992
#SPJ1
Answer: The Gilded Age was a time of economic
instability
. While a small percentage of Americans
prospered
, the rest of the population owned a
small
percentage of the nations wealth. The number of railroad miles increased rapidly, but
speculation
in railroads led directly to the Panic of 1873.
Explanation:the right answer
Who made up the Grange, and what effect did they have on the writing of the Texas Constitution of 1876?
O a. They were early wildcatters who wanted land grants from the state so they could explore for oil.
O b. They were a consortium of railroad entrepreneurs who wanted a constitution that would aid business interests.
O c. They were an agricultural group who wanted a government that would improve the plight of farmers.
O d. They were a group of pro-Union Republicans who controlled the state after the Civil War.
Answers
The people that made up the Grange were an agricultural group who wanted a government that would improve the plight of farmers.
Who were the Grangers?The term Grangers is a term that is used to refer to the coalition of farmers in the United States of America. The Grangers were a sect that were involved in the fight against the monopoly of the transportation of the grain products in the United States. The person that started the movement was Oliver Hudson Kelley.
We can say that The people that made up the Grange were an agricultural group who wanted a government that would improve the plight of farmers.
Read more on Grange here: https://brainly.com/question/1390791
#SPJ1
Which facts are used to support the author’s reasoned judgment that "a lynching fever” was to blame? Check all that apply.
the number of people killed in the city
the time the riot took place
the number of people who participated in the mob
the number of assaults committed against white women in Atlanta
the phrase “Kill the negroes!” being yelled by crowds in the city
Answers
Answer: the correct answers are C. D. and E.
Explanation: i took the assignment on ed
Answer:
Its Answer's C,D,E
Explanation:
The "Truman Doctrine" provided money for countries fighting internal and external threats of:
A. Nuclear War
B. Nazism
C. Socialism
D. Communism
Answers
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The "Truman Doctrine" provided money for countries fighting internal and external threats of: Communism. Therefore, option (D) is correct.
What was the Truman Doctrine?The Truman Doctrine was a U.S. foreign policy initiative announced by President Harry S. Truman in 1947, which provided military and economic aid to countries that were facing the threat of communist expansion or aggression.
The doctrine was a response to the Soviet Union's efforts to spread its influence in Europe and elsewhere, and it aimed to contain Soviet expansion and promote the spread of democracy and capitalism. The doctrine was a key element of the U.S. policy of containment.
The countries fighting internal and external threats of communism, the "Truman Doctrine" provided money for those countries. Thus, option (D) is correct.
Learn more about Truman Doctrine here:
https://brainly.com/question/9303871
#SPJ2
HELP If you were in charge of writing the Treaty of Versailles, how would you treat Germany after the war? Please justify your answer. (2-3 sentences)
Answers
Answer:
If you were a part of the Treaty of Versailles there is a high chance that you were very angry at Germany. One would probably treat Germany like they were the reason for the war, and that they need to suffer consequences for the damage they caused. I know this because the Treaty of Versailles made sure to punish Germany for everything, even though not all damage was Germanys fault.
Please HELP ASAP THANK YOU
There have been several controversial Supreme Court decisions in the past 50 years that many people believe should be overturned. Select one of the three cases listed below, and write a one- or two-paragraph response explaining how the decision, in that case, could be overturned. In your response, be sure to briefly describe the background of the case and which of the three ways — congressional statute, constitutional amendment, or subsequent Supreme Court ruling — you believe would be the most probable way the decision could be reversed. This section is worth 18 points. Select one of these cases: Kelo v. City of New London Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Answers
How did the United States acquire the Lousiana Purchase?
• by exchanging territory with Spain
• by fighting a war with Mexico
• by buying it from Great Britain
• by buying it from France
Answers
Answer:
by buying it from France
Explanation:
This is because, after the French Revolution, Napoleon Bonaparte became the leader of the battered country. Among other things, he envisioned the reestablishment of a new colonial presence in the New World, something that had been lost at the end of the French and Indian War (1754- 1763), one of four major colonial wars. When it became apparent that France was not in a position to afford such a grand undertaking, he opted to sell it to the most logical interested party: the United States. It must also be remembered that what comprised the Louisiana Territory was frequently under different nations' control over just the previous decade or two.
France, for instance, had first possessed Louisiana by exploratory claim, then lost it to the English. Spain later obtained control of it, but then ceded it to the French for considerations on the European mainland. When the United States contacted France about the purchase of New Orleans–essential if the trans-Appalachian states were to thrive–Napoleon’s representatives instead offered all of the Territory. Although controversial, Jefferson quickly agreed and more than doubled the size of the United States in the process. The purchase also solidified America’s place as a growing power and challenge to the British, something Napoleon was doubtless aware of and encouraged.