Answer:
E) Anti-Federalist
B) Federalist
Explanation:
The correct answer is E) Anti-Federalist and B) Federalist. The debate between the Anti-Federalist and Federalist papers over protections for individuals and limits on government power resulted in the Bill of Rights.
What distinguished Native American experiences in the East from those in the West in the latter half of the 18th century
During the late 18th century, Native American experiences varied between the Eastern and Western regions of the United States of America. In the East, Native Americans experienced a significant loss of land through treaties that were made with the federal government.
The East was more heavily populated, and the federal government sought to expand its territories by dispossessing Native Americans of their land. The government proposed that Native Americans should assimilate into European cultures. Many Native American tribes resisted these policies, resulting in the development of the Indian Wars, which eventually ended in the forced relocation of Native Americans to lands in the West. On the other hand, the Western region of the United States of America provided more opportunities for Native Americans to live their lives as they had always done. The West was sparsely populated, and as such, there was less competition for resources between Native Americans and European settlers.
This allowed Native Americans in the West to retain much of their culture and way of life. The West's vast territory also made it possible for Native American tribes to migrate and seek refuge in other regions when threatened by external forces. As a result, they were better able to preserve their cultural traditions. Native Americans' experiences in the East and West differed significantly in the latter half of the 18th century. The East was characterized by the forced relocation of Native Americans and the loss of their culture, while the West provided a relatively stable environment for them to preserve their culture and traditional way of life.
To know more about federal visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/1951874
#SPJ11
6 reasons why we study history and which reason is the most important?
1. Name the three leaders and the countries they represented at the Paris Peace Conference.
2. For each of the leaders, write a summary otheir aims as well as highlight what they wanted to see happening to Germany.
Answer:
Explanation:
France was represented by Georges Clemenceau - he wanted Germany to suffer like France did in WW1
United kingdom was represented by David Lloyd George- he wanted Germany to pay but not to much as the untied kingdom wanted to keep trading with Germany.
USA was represented by Woodrow Wilson- he wanted to keep peace between the world so he created the 14 points and the league of nations however the USA never joined
Hope this helps :)
Why was the Allied victory in North Africa significant? Check all of the boxes that apply.
Germany used North Africa as a base for its operations in the Soviet Union.
Clearing North Africa meant that the Allies could invade Sicily, Italy, and southern Europe next.
Victory in North Africa ensured that the Allies had access to oil.
The Axis powers lost a large army trying to defend North Africa.
The United States had entered the war and opened a second front.
Answer:
Clearing North Africa meant that the Allies could invade Sicily, Italy, and southern Europe next.
Victory in North Africa ensured that the Allies had access to oil.
The Axis powers lost a large army trying to defend North Africa.
The United States had entered the war and opened a second front.
All except the first one
Explanation:
The Allied victory in North Africa was very important for a few main reasons. First, when the Allies took control of North Africa, it allowed them to successfully invade places like Sicily, Italy, and southern Europe. Second, North Africa had a lot of valuable oil, which was really important for the Allies to keep fighting the war. Third, the Axis powers, especially Germany and Italy, lost a lot of soldiers and resources trying to defend North Africa. This weakened them and made it harder for them to keep fighting. Lastly, when the United States joined the war and got involved in North Africa, it created a new front against the Axis powers. This put more pressure on them and helped the Allies win. So, the Allied victory in North Africa was a big deal because it helped the Allies invade other places, gave them access to oil, hurt the Axis powers, and brought the United States into the fight.
What evidence would you provide in an essay supporting the claim that England benefits from allowing multiple religions. Remember to use parenthetical citation.
The evidence to support the claim that England benefits from allowing multiple religions in an essay is that faith or religious groups make an essential contribution to socioeconomic development based on a survey that was conducted in a 2015 research of 4,440 local faith groups that helped 47 million people from 220,000 social events in England (Chapman, 2016).
What are the benefits of multiple religious societies?They contribute socioeconomically to the society through social and charity eventsFaith groups help with tackling societal challenges and world problems as religious leaders hold influence over their congregationCountries with multiple religions limits extreme valuesEncourages refined beliefs and social interactionsLearn more on religion here: https://brainly.com/question/1808291
#SPJ1
Name three factors that contribute to poor success of the new jamestown colony.
Answer:
1.) Poor water quality. The water that surrounded the settlers was marshy, meaning that it was salty and essentially unsafe to consume.
2.) Mosquitoes: The swamp also left the settlers to deal with mosquitoes which proved to be carriers of diseases such as malaria, leaving the settlers to fight off disease while simultaneously fighting hunger and thirst due to their land and water quality.
3.) Lack of skills amongst the settlers: The majority of the settlers lacked the skills necessary for survival, even too afraid to venture from the settlement in search of food. The land quality and lack of farming skills were a dangerous combination.
Is genocide a modern phenomenon?
Answer: NO
Explanation:
it has happened throughout history not just in what we equate to modern Society take the native Americans both with the US and Spain as an example in may not have been on purpose 10% of the time but there are whole ethnic groups that were wiped of the face of the map and the definition of genocide is “the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.” Hope this helps
PLEASE HELP ILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
WHICH FIRST AMENDMENT FROM THE PICTURE WOULD BE ESPECIALLY WELCOMED BY PUBLISHERS OF NEWSPAPERS???
My guess would be the first one
Answer:
the 2nd one
Explanation:
8) What were 2 of the benefits and 2 of the challenges faced by
Americans and the Mexicans in the Mexican American War?
PLEASE HELP ME
Answer:
ur mom is awesome just because
Explanation:
I love u and so does Jesus
fix the jumbled words:
KABEDNA
(vocal and music of mindanao)
Answer:
Debakan
Explanation:
Answer:
debakan
Explanation:
sana makatulong
What former country, taken as part of a bargain between Stalin and Hitler in the Non-
Aggression Pact at the beginning of World War II, became a Soviet Satellite state after
the war?
Because it rests on a square base, the dome of the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople is supported by four triangular surfaces known as ____.
The dome of the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople is supported by four triangular surfaces known as pendentives
Should the U.S. be held to a higher standard in regards to our rights
and laws? If the person is a citizen or not, does that make a
difference in how many rights they should have?
Answer:
Yes, although It depends on the right you are referring to. For an example, everyone who is welcomed (legally) into the states has basic unalienable rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But, other rights such as the second Amendment (the right to bear arms) should not be allowed to everyone who comes into American that is not a citizen. This could pose a threat to the American people, especially since we don’t always know the intentions of everyone.
Unfortunately, not everyone who visits The United States is friendly and so, precautions should be made and therefore citizenship should be a requirement to certain rights.
.Which of the following was NOT true of the expedition against Canada in 1775-1776?
a.
Smallpox was perhaps their greatest adversary on that campaign.
b.
It resulted in an important American victory and set the tone for the coming campaign.
c.
It was led in part by General Benedict Arnold.
d.
It had as its main goal the expulsion of Indian tribes in the area.
e.
It made Americans see the long-term nature of their struggle.
The statement that was NOT true of the expedition against Canada in 1775-1776 was d. It did not have as its main goal the expulsion of Indian tribes in the area.
The expedition was a military campaign launched by American forces during the American Revolutionary War, with the objective of capturing the British province of Quebec. The campaign faced several challenges, including a lack of supplies, harsh weather conditions, and the outbreak of smallpox among the troops. Despite these challenges, the campaign resulted in important American victories, and it made Americans realize the long-term nature of their struggle for independence. The campaign was led in part by General Benedict Arnold, who played a key role in the capture of Fort Ticonderoga.
'To know more about American victories refer :
https://brainly.com/question/1101346
#SPJ11
How did aspoka the dgreat contribute to the spread of buddhism in ancient lndia
Answer: He ate my dog.
Explanation: He eats people's dogs and makes out with them. He helped everyone in the country to become a better person.
B. What impact has "The Balfour Declaration" had on the world today? Explain your
answer
Answer:
Palestine.
Explanation:
The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British government in 1917 during the First World War announcing support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a small minority Jewish population. The declaration was contained in a letter dated 2 November 1917 from the United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. The text of the declaration was published in the press on 9 November 1917.
Immediately following their declaration of war on the Ottoman Empire in November 1914, the British War Cabinet began to consider the future of Palestine; within two months a memorandum was circulated to the Cabinet by a Zionist Cabinet member, Herbert Samuel, proposing the support of Zionist ambitions in order to enlist the support of Jews in the wider war. A committee was established in April 1915 by British Prime Minister H. H. Asquith to determine their policy towards the Ottoman Empire including Palestine. Asquith, who had favoured post-war reform of the Ottoman Empire, resigned in December 1916; his replacement David Lloyd George, favoured partition of the Empire. The first negotiations between the British and the Zionists took place at a conference on 7 February 1917 that included Sir Mark Sykes and the Zionist leadership. Subsequent discussions led to Balfour's request, on 19 June, that Rothschild and Chaim Weizmann submit a draft of a public declaration. Further drafts were discussed by the British Cabinet during September and October, with input from Zionist and anti-Zionist Jews but with no representation from the local population in Palestine.
By late 1917, in the lead up to the Balfour Declaration, the wider war had reached a stalemate, with two of Britain's allies not fully engaged: the United States had yet to suffer a casualty, and the Russians were in the midst of a revolution with Bolsheviks taking over the government. A stalemate in southern Palestine was broken by the Battle of Beersheba on 31 October 1917. The release of the final declaration was authorised on 31 October; the preceding Cabinet discussion had referenced perceived propaganda benefits amongst the worldwide Jewish community for the Allied war effort.
The opening words of the declaration represented the first public expression of support for Zionism by a major political power. The term "national home" had no precedent in international law, and was intentionally vague as to whether a Jewish state was contemplated. The intended boundaries of Palestine were not specified, and the British government later confirmed that the words "in Palestine" meant that the Jewish national home was not intended to cover all of Palestine. The second half of the declaration was added to satisfy opponents of the policy, who had claimed that it would otherwise prejudice the position of the local population of Palestine and encourage antisemitism worldwide by "stamping the Jews as strangers in their native lands". The declaration called for safeguarding the civil and religious rights for the Palestinian Arabs, who composed the vast majority of the local population, and also the rights and political status of the Jewish communities in other countries outside of Palestine. The British government acknowledged in 1939 that the local population's views should have been taken into account, and recognised in 2017 that the declaration should have called for the protection of the Palestinian Arabs' political rights.
The declaration had many long-lasting consequences. It greatly increased popular support for Zionism within Jewish communities worldwide, and became a core component of the British Mandate for Palestine, the founding document of Mandatory Palestine, which later became Israel and the Palestinian territories. As a result, it is considered a principal cause of the ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict, often described as the world's most intractable conflict. Controversy remains over a number of areas, such as whether the declaration contradicted earlier promises the British made to the Sharif of Mecca in the McMahon–Hussein correspondence.
the speedy trial act of 1974 (amended in 1979) allows how many days from indictment to trial?
The Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (amended in 1979) generally requires that a federal criminal defendant be brought to trial within 70 days of their indictment or initial appearance, whichever comes later.
The Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (amended in 1979). The Speedy Trial Act allows for a maximum of 70 days from indictment to trial. However, there are exceptions and exclusions to this rule that can extend the time frame, such as when the defendant requests a delay or when certain pretrial motions are pending.
The Speedy Trial Act of 1974 (amended in 1979) generally requires that a federal criminal defendant be brought to trial within 70 days of their indictment or initial appearance, whichever comes later.
Overall, the act aims to ensure that criminal defendants are not kept waiting in jail for extended periods of time before their case is resolved.
Learn more about Speedy Trial Act
brainly.com/question/4445297
#SPJ11
Which federal agency created during the New Deal was set up to raise farm prices by getting farmers to grow fewer crops?
A. the Tennessee Valley Authority
B. the Civilian Conservation Corps
C. the Public Works Administration
D. the Agricultural Adjustment Administration
Answer:
Explanation:
D. the Agricultural Adjustment Administration
How do terrorist groups destabilize countries?
Answer:
Terrorism poses a direct threat to the security of the citizens of NATO countries, and to international stability and prosperity.
Explanation:
Take a look at 2004. What event led to democratic changes around the Middle East? What were they and did they last?
Baghdad, the Iraq capital, fell quickly and democratic elections were held in 2004. By 2006, Hussein was found and executed by his own people for crimes against humanity. The war divided the U.S. and the world. Many questioned Bush’s motivations for the war.
\(\qquad\qquad\quad\large{\pink{ \sf⿻Answer⿻}} \\\)
The event that led to democratic changes around the Middle East in 2004 was the fall of Baghdad, the capital of Iraq. Following the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime, democratic elections were held in Iraq. This event marked a significant shift towards democratic governance in the region.
The execution of Saddam Hussein in 2006 by his own people further symbolized a break from the oppressive regime that had ruled Iraq for decades. The trial and subsequent execution of Hussein were seen as steps towards justice and accountability for his crimes against humanity.
However, it is important to note that the democratic changes in Iraq and their lasting impact have been subject to various challenges and complexities. Despite the initial progress, Iraq has faced ongoing political instability, sectarian tensions, and security issues. The democratic institutions that were established have faced numerous challenges, including corruption and a struggle for power among different factions.
The Iraq War, which began in 2003, indeed divided the United States and the international community. Many questioned the motivations and justifications put forth by the U.S. administration under President George W. Bush for initiating the war. The lack of evidence regarding weapons of mass destruction, which was one of the main justifications presented, raised doubts and skepticism among many.
Overall, while the fall of Baghdad and the subsequent democratic elections in Iraq marked a significant moment for the region, the long-term stability and success of democracy in Iraq have been marred by various challenges and ongoing conflicts. The consequences and impact of the Iraq War continue to be debated, and its legacy in terms of democratic changes in the Middle East remains complex and multifaceted.
did america ever execute people during the mccarthy era on unsubstantiated evidence of them being a communist
Yes, America executed people during the McCarthy era on unsubstantiated evidence of them being a communist. The most notable example of this is the execution of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg in 1953.
The Rosenbergs were accused of spying for the Soviet Union and providing them with nuclear secrets, but the evidence against them was largely circumstantial and based on the testimony of other suspects who were also under pressure to cooperate with the government.
Despite international protests and appeals for clemency, the Rosenbergs were put to death in the electric chair. The case has been widely criticized as a miscarriage of justice and a reflection of the paranoia and hysteria of the McCarthy era. Other victims of McCarthyism were also targeted based on unsubstantiated evidence of their Communist affiliations.
Thousands of people lost their jobs, were blacklisted from the entertainment industry, or were forced to testify before Congress about their political beliefs. Many of these individuals were innocent of any wrongdoing, but their lives and careers were ruined by the accusations and investigations during the McCarthy era.
Know more about McCarthy era here:
https://brainly.com/question/30286478
#SPJ11
What were the 3 main reasons for European imperialism in Africa?
Three major elements drove Europe's imperialist thrust into Africa: economic, political, and social. It arose in the nineteenth century as a result of the collapse of the slave trade's profitability, its abolition and suppression, and the rise of the European capitalist Industrial Revolution.
The primary motivations for African colonization were economic, political, and religious. During this period of colonization, Europe was experiencing an economic crisis, with powerful countries such as Germany, France, and the United Kingdom losing money.
The expansion of competitive trade in Europe fueled imperialist ambitions in Africa. The main goal was to secure commercial and trade links with African societies and to safeguard those links from competition from other Europeans.
Learn more about to Europe's imperialist ;
https://brainly.com/question/29512442
#SPJ4
How did Roosevelt suggest that Germany pay for the damage it had caused?
He demanded that Germany pay heavy reparations for the war damage it caused. Roosevelt agreed, but he insisted reparations be based on Germany's ability to pay. He also suggested, and Stalin agreed, that Germany pay reparations with trade goods and products instead of cash.
How did the absolute monarch Maria Theresa of Austria increase her authority? Select all that apply.
Answer:
The answer is: by curbing the power of the nobles and limiting the power of the Church.
By limiting the power of the church, Maria Theresa of Austria can focus on allocating her funds to programs that give direct income such as health or education rather than religious programs.
Curbing the power of the nobles also served her interests since she can win over many officials to work in her favor rather than the nobles.
select a time period between 1750 and today each group must select a different time period. - 1750-1800 -1800-1850 1850-1900 1900-1950 1950-today
The events associated with these periods are as follows:
1750-1800: This was the period of the American Revolution and the Enlightenment. It was a time of great political and intellectual change, with many important thinkers and writers emerging during this period.
What happened during the other periods?1800-1850: This was the period of the Industrial Revolution and the rise of modern capitalism. It was a time of rapid technological change and economic growth, but also of social upheaval and exploitation.
1850-1900: This was the period of European imperialism and the rise of nationalism. It was a time of great political and cultural change, with many countries undergoing major transformations and new ideas and ideologies emerging.
1900-1950: This was the period of the two World Wars and the Cold War. It was a time of great geopolitical and military conflict, but also of significant scientific and technological progress, cultural and artistic movements, and social and political change.
1950-today: This is the period of globalization and the digital age. It has been a time of rapid technological change and economic growth, but also of environmental challenges, political and social unrest, and cultural and ideological clashes.
learn more about industrial revolution: https://brainly.com/question/13323062
#SPJ1
which color is used in both the hawaiian feather cloak and the moai ancestor figures from easter island?
The color that is used in both the Hawaiian feather cloak and the Moai ancestor figures from Easter Island is red.
Both the Hawaiian feather cloak and the Moai ancestor figures from Easter Island incorporate the color red in their design. In the case of the Hawaiian feather cloak, known as "ʻAhuʻula" in the Hawaiian language, red feathers from the 'i'iwi bird or the 'apapane bird were traditionally used to create the vibrant red color. The feathers were meticulously collected, sorted, and attached to a woven fiber base, resulting in a striking red appearance.
Similarly, the Moai ancestor figures from Easter Island, also known as "Rapa Nui," feature a reddish color. This color is believed to have been achieved through the use of red pigment, possibly derived from volcanic rock or mineral-rich soil found on the island. The red color adds a distinct and visually captivating element to the Moai statues, contributing to their cultural and artistic significance.
Both the Hawaiian feather cloak and the Moai ancestor figures demonstrate the cultural importance of the color red in their respective traditions, highlighting the significance of this color in their artistic expressions and symbolic representations.
To learn more about Easter Island, refer:
brainly.com/question/26256943
#SPJ11
Finally, find one origin story from a Native American tribe.
Summarize it and give a reaction.
Cite sources in MLA or APA style.
All of the following are associated with Islamic art and architecture EXCEPT:
A. arabesque and geometric patterns
B. calligraphy
C. imans
D. mosaics
Answer: By what I remember I really believe the answer is calligraghy.
Hope it helps!!
How did tanks help overcome the staleman of trench warfare?
And
What problems did tanks encounter on the battlefield?
what is an example of the DeChurch & Marks model in
action?
The DeChurch & Marks model is a model used to analyze and optimize the effectiveness of teams. The model is based on four critical dimensions, which are task, structure, process, and context. Below is an example of the DeChurch & Marks model in action.
A company that wants to improve its product development process can use the DeChurch & Marks model. Task: The company identifies the product development process as the task. Structure: The company analyzes the structure of the product development team, including the roles and responsibilities of team members, and how they interact. Process: The company examines the product development process, including the tools and techniques used to develop the product and how the team communicates. Context: The company looks at the external factors that affect the product development process, such as market trends and competition. By using the DeChurch & Marks model, the company can optimize the effectiveness of its product development team by making improvements in the four critical dimensions of task, structure, process, and context.
to know about product development process visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30910271
#SPJ11