What are the coordinates of the circumcenter of this triangle?
Enter your answer by filling in the boxes.

The inequality to show the values of [w] that will not exceed the weight limit of the elevator is w + 1643 ≤ 2000. On solving the inequality, we get w ≤ 357. The graph of the inequality is attached.

        ≤ : less than or equal to

        ≥ : greater than or equal to

        < : less than

        > : greater than

        ≠ : not equal to

Given is the maximum load for a certain elevator is 2000 pounds. The total weight of the passengers on the elevator is 1400 pounds. A delivery man who weighs 243 pounds enters the elevator with a crate of weight [w].

        1400 + 243 + w ≤ 2000

        w + 1643 ≤ 2000

        w + 1643 ≤ 2000

        w ≤ 2000 - 1643

        w ≤ 357

Therefore, the inequality to show the values of [w] that will not exceed the weight limit of the elevator is w + 1643 ≤ 2000. On solving the inequality, we get w ≤ 357. The graph of the inequality is attached.

To solve more questions on inequalities, we get -

https://brainly.com/question/11897796

#SPJ1

Answer:

Online Real Estate Investment Opportunities

Hiring a Property Management Company

Make Sure There's Enough Money Available

Calculate Your Expenses

You Should Earn roughly 10% After Costs and Income are Calculated

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps

mark me brainliest

The linear cost function is C(x) is (2100 + 20x).

What is Cost function?

The cost function calculates the absolute lowest cost of generating a specified level of output at some fixed factor prices. A firm's economic potential is described by the cost function.

As given,

Marginal cost $20; 170 items cost $5500 to produce.

Evaluate the Fixed cost:

Fixed cost = 5500 - 20 × 170

                  = 5500 - 3400

                  = 2100

Now,

cost function = fixed cost + x × (marginal cost)

Substitute values respectively,

cost function = 2100 + 20x.

Hence, the linear cost function is C(x) is (2100 + 20x).

To learn more about Cost functions from the given link.

https://brainly.com/question/2292799

#SPJ4

Answer:

greater than

hope this helps! <3

Answer:

8.2 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

\( \cos \: 47 \degree = \frac{h}{12} \\ \\ h = 12 \cos \:47 \degree \\ \\ h = 12 \times 0.6819983601 \\ \\ h = 8.18398032 \\ \\ h \approx \: 8.2 \: cm\)

Answer: C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: I think the answer is A.

Step-by-step explanation:

The study has a confounding variable since the two groups differ in the time they were supposed to report to the testing room. Since the groups differed in terms of sleep deprivation and the time they were supposed to report to the testing room, the effect of sleep deprivation on learning could not be isolated.

The statement that is true is: d. All of these are true.Explanation:A study may have various sources of variability, including participant selection, the setting in which the study is conducted, and the measure used. The following options are as follows:a. The study may be affected by a situational variable.b. The construction noise may contribute to variability in test scores.c. The study has a confounding variable. The groups differ in the time they are to report to the testing room.d. All of these are true.Therefore, all of these options are true. For example, the study may be affected by a situational variable if a natural disaster or other unforeseen event happens that causes the study to be disrupted. In this case, the study was disrupted by a noisy construction crew, which may have contributed to variability in test scores. The study has a confounding variable since the two groups differ in the time they were supposed to report to the testing room. Since the groups differed in terms of sleep deprivation and the time they were supposed to report to the testing room, the effect of sleep deprivation on learning could not be isolated.

To know more about isolated visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32227296

#SPJ11

Answer:

12.6

Step-by-step explanation:

3.5 x 3600 divided by 1,000 = 12.6 kilograms

The scatterplot with the least squares line provides insights into the relationship between average annual global surface temperature and the years from 2000 to 2015, allowing us to assess trends, strength of correlation, and make predictions within certain limitations.

The scatterplot represents the relationship between the average annual global surface temperature, in degrees Celsius, and the corresponding years from 2000 to 2015. The line drawn on the plot is the least squares line, which is the best fit line that minimizes the overall distance between the observed data points and the line.

The least squares line is determined using a statistical method called linear regression. It calculates the equation of a straight line that represents the trend in the data. This line serves as a mathematical model to estimate the average temperature based on the year.

By analyzing the scatterplot and the least squares line, we can make several observations. Firstly, we can see whether the temperature has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining relatively stable over the given years. If the slope of the line is positive, it indicates a positive correlation, implying that the temperature has been increasing. Conversely, a negative slope suggests a decreasing trend.

Additionally, we can evaluate the strength of the relationship between temperature and time by examining how closely the data points cluster around the line. If the points are closely grouped around the line, it suggests a strong correlation, indicating that the line is a good representation of the data. On the other hand, if the points are more scattered, the correlation may be weaker.

Furthermore, the line can be used to predict the average annual global surface temperature for future years beyond the data range of 2000 to 2015. However, it's important to note that such predictions should be made with caution and considering other factors that may affect global temperatures, such as climate change and natural variability.

for such more question on least squares

https://brainly.com/question/3617398

#SPJ8

Question

The given scatterplot shows the average annual global surface temperature, in degrees celsius, for each year from 2000 to 2015. the line drawn is the least squares line for the data set.

The mean would be increased by c, but the median and mode would be unaffected if each data value had a constant value of c added to it.

When a constant value of c is added to each data value, the mean, median, and mode of the data set would be affected in the following way:The mean would be increased by c, but the median and mode would be unaffected.Hence, the correct option is:

The mean would be increased by c, but the median and mode would be unaffected.Mean, median, and mode are the measures of central tendency of a data set.

The effect of adding a constant value of c to each data value on the measures of central tendency is as follows:The mean is the arithmetic average of the data set.

When a constant value c is added to each data value, the new mean will increase by c because the sum of the data values also increases by c times the number of data values.

The median is the middle value of the data set when the values are arranged in order. Since the value of c is constant, it does not affect the relative order of the data values.

Therefore, the median remains unchanged.The mode is the value that occurs most frequently in the data set. Adding a constant value of c to each data value does not affect the frequency of occurrence of the values. Hence, the mode remains unchanged.

Therefore, the mean would be increased by c, but the median and mode would be unaffected if each data value had a constant value of c added to it.

To know more about central tendency visit:

brainly.com/question/28473992

#SPJ11

Answer:

x=9

Step-by-step explanation:

y=4x-8 y=2x+10​

4x-8=2x+10​

2x=18

x=9

If the canopy of a parachute is a semicircle with a radius of 13 feet, 88.5 ft² is needed to make a single parachute canopy. So, correct option is B.

To determine the amount of fabric of each color that will be needed to make a single parachute canopy, we first need to find the total area of the canopy. The canopy is a semicircle, so we can use the formula for the area of a circle (A = πr²) and divide it by 2 to get the area of a semicircle:

A = 1/2 x π x r²

A = 1/2 x π x 13²

A ≈ 265.33 ft²

So the total area of the canopy is approximately 266.29 square feet.

Since the parachute needs to be made from equal parts of red, white, and blue fabric, we can divide the total area by 3 to get the amount of fabric needed for each color:

265.33 ft² / 3 ≈ 88.5 ft²

Rounded to one decimal place, we get approximately 88.5 ft² of fabric for each color.

Therefore, the Correct answer in B.

To learn more about semicircle click on,

https://brainly.com/question/2871931

#SPJ4

Complete question is:

The canopy of a parachute is a semicircle with a radius of 13 feet. A company that is making parachutes for a Fourth of July celebration wants each parachute to be made from equal parts of red, white, and blue fabric.

Approximately how much fabric of each color will be needed to make a single parachute canopy?

A) 88.5 ft

B) 88.5 ft²

C) 265.5 ft

D) 265.5 ft²

Yes it is correct that the expected value of a random variable can be interpreted as a long-run average.

The expected value of a random variable is a concept used in probability theory and statistics. It is a way to summarize the average behavior or central tendency of the random variable.

To understand why the expected value represents the average value that the random variable would take in the long run, consider a simple example. Let's say we have a fair six-sided die, and we want to find the expected value of the outcomes when rolling the die.

The possible outcomes when rolling the die are numbers from 1 to 6, each with a probability of 1/6. The expected value is calculated by multiplying each outcome by its corresponding probability and summing them up.

To know more about random variable,

https://brainly.com/question/29851447

#SPJ11

Answer:33

Step-by-step explanation: Subtract 91 by 58

After that it gives you 33 so the beans weigh 33 more g's than the rice

Answer:

The beans weigh 33 grams more than the rice.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this, find the difference between the two numbers by subtracting the smaller number from the larger one.

91-58=33

Answer:

1/ $ 4.08

2/ $675.92

Step-by-step explanation:

Take 68 times 0.06% = $4.08

680 - 4.08= 675.92

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

40.80 it told me the answer

M is true, which is the first part of the conjunction, and H must be wrong.

To get the first part of conjunction, use CP; to get the second part, use the conditional as a premise, but don't take the second part of conjunction from CP. With that said, let's look at the premises and the conclusion that this practice can generate.
C: (H → M) & ~F
1: ~H V ~F
2: ~M → F
3: (~H V M) → ~F
The first premise says that H implies M and F is not true. Premise two says that ~M implies F.

The third premise says that ~H or M implies ~F.

The idea here is to use CP to get the first part of the conjunction from the first premise, which is H → M. This means that either H is false, or M is true.

The second premise gives you ~M → F, which means that if ~M is correct, F must be correct. Therefore, M is true, which is the first part of the conjunction.
The third premise says that if ~H or M is correct, ~F must be true. We know that M is correct because of the first premise, so if ~H is correct, then ~F must be correct, which is the second part of the conjunction. The first premise gives you M.

The second premise gives you ~M → F.

This means that ~M is false, so F must be correct. The third premise says that if ~H is correct, ~F must be correct, and we know that F is right, so H must be wrong.

In conclusion, to get the first part of conjunction, use CP. To get the second part, use the conditional as a premise, but don't take the second part of conjunction from CP. The first premise gives you H implies M and F is not true. Premise two says that ~M implies F. The third premise says that ~H or M implies ~F. Therefore, M is true, which is the first part of the conjunction, and H must be wrong.

To know more about conjunction visit:

brainly.com/question/32355977

#SPJ11

Answer: a≈2.22

V=a3

a=V⅓=11⅓≈2.22398in

Step-by-step explanation:

The represented 'box' size in space, which is 2 feet (24 inches) on a side, is approximately 6.47 ×\(10^(^-^1^7^)\) parsecs.

To calculate the amount of space represented by a box that is 2 feet (24 inches) on a side, we need to convert the length in feet to parsecs. A parsec is a unit of length used in astronomy to measure vast distances.

First, we need to determine the scale factor that relates feet to parsecs. The conversion factor is based on the definition that 1 parsec is approximately equal to 3.09 × \(10^1^6\) feet.

To find the represented 'box' size in space in parsecs, we can use the following calculation:

Represented 'box' size (in parsecs) = Box size (in feet) / Conversion factor

Box size (in feet) = 2 feet

Conversion factor = 3.09 ×\(10^1^6\)feet/parsec

Substituting the values into the equation, we have:

Represented 'box' size (in parsecs) = 2 feet / (3.09 × \(10^1^6\)feet/parsec)

Simplifying the expression:

Represented 'box' size (in parsecs) = 2 / (3.09 × \(10^1^6\)) parsecs

Calculating the result:

Represented 'box' size (in parsecs) ≈ 6.47 ×\(10^(^-^1^7^)\) parsecs

In other words, the box's spatial representation corresponds to approximately 6.47 × \(10^(^-^1^7^)\)parsecs.

It is important to note that this calculation assumes a linear scale and does not account for the complexities of space and the actual distribution of objects. The approximation provides a rough estimate of the spatial representation of the given box size in parsecs.

For more such information on: space

https://brainly.com/question/29020717

#SPJ8

Option C is correct. When there is no other way to achieve a specific research goal  minimal deception considered ethical in research.

When there is no other way to achieve a specific research goal. Minimal deception is considered ethical in research only when it is necessary to achieve a specific research goal, and there is no other way to achieve that goal without using deception. In these cases, the use of deception should be justified and minimized as much as possible.

Researchers should consider the potential harm to participants, and carefully weigh the potential benefits of the research against any potential harm.

Additionally, the use of deception should be disclosed to participants as soon as possible after the completion of the study, so that they can understand what has occurred and why. Overall, researchers should strive to be transparent and to minimize the use of deception whenever possible, and to use it only when it is necessary to achieve a specific research goal that cannot be accomplished through other means.

To know more about ethical research click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17473456#

#SPJ11

Answer:

\( \sqrt{48} \times \sqrt{3} \\ \sqrt{144} \\ 12\)

Answer:  The choice will be any equation where the slope is the same and the y-intercept is different.

\(y=\frac{5}{6}x + b\)

Step-by-step explanation:  Using slope-intercept form, y = mx + b,

m is the slope, b is the y-intercept.

Parallel lines will have the same slope.

So, you are looking for another equation that has 5/6 as the coefficient of x.

It could be an equation in the form 6y + 5x = _b_ where the constant, b, could be anything except -42, as that would be an identical line, not parallel.

Function 1 has a greater slope than Function 2, and the answer is Function 1.

Function 1 is defined by the equation y = \(\frac{5}{4}r - 1\).

Function 2 is defined by line p, which is shown on the graph.

The problem asks which function has a greater slope.

The slope of a line is calculated by the ratio of the difference between the vertical axis values and the difference between the horizontal axis values.

This is shown in the formula:

slope = rise/run.

Here, rise refers to the vertical difference and run refers to the horizontal difference.

This means that the slope of a line measures how steeply the line is increasing or decreasing.

Function 1: y = \(\frac{5}{4}r - 1\)

Here, the equation of Function 1 is given as y = \(\frac{5}{4}\)r - 1.

From this equation, we can see that the slope of Function 1 is equal to \(\frac{5}{4}\).

Therefore, the slope of Function 1 is 1.25.Function 2: Line pNext, we need to determine the slope of line p, which represents Function 2.

To do this, we can use two points on the line.

From the graph, we can see that the line passes through the point (0, -2) and the point (4, 1).

The rise of this line is equal to 1 - (-2) = 3, while the run is equal to 4 - 0 = 4.

Thus, the slope of line p is equal to 3/4.

Therefore, the slope of Function 2 is 0.75.

Comparing the slopes, we can see that Function 1 has a greater slope than Function 2.

Specifically, the slope of Function 1 is 1.25, while the slope of Function 2 is 0.75.

For more related questions on slope:

https://brainly.com/question/3605446

#SPJ8

Answer:

wait.

Step-by-step explanation:

what do u really mean by zombies

The error in finding the measure of one exterior angle of a regular polygon lies in using the formula 360°/n, where n is the number of sides of the polygon.

The formula 360°/n is used to find the measure of each exterior angle of a regular polygon. It is based on the idea that the sum of all exterior angles of any polygon is always 360 degrees. However, this formula assumes that the polygon has internal angles of 180°, which is true only for regular polygons.

The error occurs when this formula is applied to a non-regular polygon, as non-regular polygons have varying internal angles. Using the formula 360°/n for a non-regular polygon will give incorrect results because the internal angles are not all equal.

For regular polygons, each exterior angle is indeed 360°/n, and the sum of all exterior angles will be 360 degrees. However, for non-regular polygons, this formula cannot be used, and the measures of exterior angles must be calculated differently based on their internal angles and sides.

To know more about regular polygon, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29722724#

#SPJ11

The error in finding the measure of one exterior angle of a regular polygon is they divided 360 by 10 instead of 5.

Given that,

There are a total of 10 exterior angles, two at each vertex, so the measure of one exterior angle is 360°/10 = 36°.

Here, at each vertex there are two angles.

So, there must be 5 vertices and 5 sides.

Then, the measure of one exterior angle = 360°/5

= 72°

Therefore, the error in finding the measure of one exterior angle of a regular polygon is they divided 360 by 10 instead of 5.

Learn more about the sum of exterior angles of polygon here:

https://brainly.com/question/1983075.

#SPJ4

"Your question is incomplete, probably the complete question/missing part is:"

Describe and correct the error in finding the measure of one exterior angle of a regular polygon. There are a total of 10 exterior angles, two at each vertex, so the measure of one exterior angle is 360°/10 = 36°.

Therefore, the 98% confidence interval for the population mean number of days per week that Americans who are members of a fitness club go to their fitness center is (2.661, 4.339) rounded to 3 decimal places.

To find the 98% confidence interval for the population mean number of days per week that Americans who are members of a fitness club go to their fitness center, we can use the following formula:

CI = X ± t*(s/√n)

where CI is the confidence interval, X is the sample mean, t is the t-score with n-1 degrees of freedom and a 98% confidence level, s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

Given that X = 3.5, s = 1.7, and n = 25, we first need to find the t-score from the t-distribution table with 24 degrees of freedom and a 98% confidence level. From the table, we find that t = 2.492.

Substituting the values in the formula, we get:

CI = 3.5 ± 2.492*(1.7/√25)

Simplifying the equation, we get:

CI = 3.5 ± 0.839

=(2.661, 4.339)

To know more about confidence interval,

https://brainly.com/question/23887405

#SPJ11

Answer:

.25 mph

Step-by-step explanation:

1320 feet per hour , 1/4 mph

Answer: 15 miles per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

110 feet in 5s

220 in 10 sec

1320 in 1 min

79,200 in 1 hour

79,200 feet= 15 miles

15 miles in 1 hour is 15mph

Answer:

We have parallel lines intersected by a transversal.

Corresponding angles are congruent:

5q + 3 = 3q + 11

2q = 8, so q = 4

Alternate interior angles are congruent:

3r - 4 = 6r - 19

3r = 15, so r = 5

Consecutive interior angles are supplementary:

4s + s + 90 = 180

5s = 90, so s = 18

Supplementary angles:

2t + 20 = 4t + 10

2t = 10, so t = 5

Answer:

Dis’ old bet you got help lolllllllllllllll *sings in gay ferret*

I might be better on my own

I hate you blowing up my phone

I wish I never met yo' a*s

Sometimes it be like that

But I'm not myself the nights you're gone

There ain't no way I'm moving on

I'm not afraid to need you bad

Sometimes it be like that