what is the main feature of a constitutional government?

During the Warring States period, various states in China engaged in conflicts and wars. Eventually, one state emerged victorious and unified China.

The Warring States period in ancient China was characterized by intense competition and warfare among multiple states vying for power and control. This period lasted from the 5th century BCE to the 3rd century BCE.

The unification of China was a complex process that involved military conquests, political maneuvering, and socio-economic changes. It brought about a new era of imperial rule and left a lasting impact on the political, social, and cultural development of China.

For more questions on conflicts

https://brainly.com/question/32663176

#SPJ8

Complete Question:

What do you understand by ''warring states were defeated and China unifies''.

Cross-cultural interaction of technology, due to bilateral agreements and interactions, changed the patterns of trade and travel in the 1450 to 1750 time period.

Cross-cultural communication is impacted by new technology, globalization, and changing organizational cultures. Over the past ten years, the importance of cross-cultural communications to corporate operations has grown considerably. Employers are seeking graduates with the capabilities necessary to satisfy their evolving business needs.

Social media and other digital technologies have made it possible for us to share and communicate in real time beyond conventional cultural barriers and increase trade and travel. Because of political connections and agreements, cross-cultural interaction caused technology to spread. Countries competed to export the most items in international trade.

To learn more about cross-cultural, follow the below link:

https://brainly.com/question/28420407

#SPJ4

Answer:

Both Empires began as republics

Explanation:

Both empires began as republics Both empires controlled territories in the Americas

Answer:

It's B.

Explanation:

I think it's B. because it makes the most sense, but I'm really sorry if it's wrong.

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

I think?

Answer:

Adam Smith is called the "father of economics" because of his theories on capitalism ,free markets, and supply and demand

The differences in the data presented by Source A and Source B can be attributed to various factors. Firstly, different sources might have utilized different methodologies or relied on different historical records, leading to variations in the reported numbers.

In terms of source reliability, both Source A and Source B have some credibility. Source A is a book written by university professors, suggesting a scholarly and academic approach. The expertise and research background of the authors lend credibility to their work.

On the other hand, Source B is from a well-known historical website, which implies a certain level of reputation and authority in historical information. However, it's important to note that not all websites are equally reliable, and further investigation is needed to assess the website's credibility.

Considering the context of a school research project, Source A, a book written by university professors, may be more suitable. Books often undergo a rigorous academic review process and are written by experts in the field.

They generally provide more comprehensive analysis and context, which is crucial for a thorough understanding of the topic. Moreover, the expertise and credibility of university professors contribute to the reliability of the information presented in Source A.

For such more question on historical:

https://brainly.com/question/25670011

#SPJ8

Answer:

Whattever Hamilton is for, Jefferson is aganist and the musical clearly captures the differences.

Explanation:

Answer:

Through this movement, women gained equal rights such as a right to an education, a right to work, and a right to vote. One of the most important issues that The Women's Liberation movement faced was the banning of abortion and contraception, which the group saw as a violation of women's rights.

The tribute of boy children or devshirme that the Ottoman Turks levied from their Christian subjects in the Balkans was a significant part of Ottoman military practice. The boys were raised for service in the civil administration or in the elite Janissary infantry corps.

Devshirme is a Turkish word that means "gathering" or "collecting." It refers to a system of taxation and recruitment that was used by the Ottoman Empire during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. Under this system, Christian boys between the ages of eight and eighteen were taken from their families and brought to Istanbul, where they were trained to become soldiers, bureaucrats, or members of the sultan's household. The devshirme system was particularly important for the Ottoman military, as it provided a steady supply of well-trained soldiers for the elite Janissary infantry corps.

The Janissaries were a highly respected military force within the Ottoman Empire. They were known for their discipline, their loyalty to the sultan, and their expertise in firearms. Janissaries were drawn from the devshirme pool, and they received extensive training in military tactics, marksmanship, and other skills. As a result, they were among the most effective soldiers in the world, and they played a key role in many Ottoman military victories.

The devshirme system was controversial, however, as it involved taking children away from their families and forcing them to convert to Islam. Some families tried to avoid the devshirme by hiding their children or paying bribes to Ottoman officials. Despite these efforts, the devshirme remained an important part of Ottoman military practice until the seventeenth century. Overall, the devshirme was a key element of Ottoman military and political power, as it helped to create a loyal and well-trained group of soldiers and administrators who were devoted to the sultan and the empire.

To know more about Ottoman Turks visit:

https://brainly.com/question/6804486

#SPJ11

The principles of joint operations are formed around the traditional principles of war, and restraint, perseverance, and legitimacy are three additional principles that are relevant to the use of combat power by the Armed Forces of the United States across the range of military operations.

These three principles, along with the original nine, constitute the 12 principles of joint operations. The traditional principles of war, such as objective, offensive, mass, economy of force, maneuver, unity of command, security, surprise, and simplicity, provide a foundation for guiding military planning and execution to achieve mission success. Restraint emphasizes the importance of employing appropriate and proportional force, minimizing collateral damage, and avoiding unnecessary harm to non-combatants. Perseverance underscores the need to maintain effort and resolve in the face of adversity and challenges. Legitimacy highlights the adherence to laws, rules of engagement, and ethical standards, ensuring that military operations are conducted lawfully and ethically.

By incorporating these three additional principles, the Armed Forces of the United States aim to conduct military operations with a greater emphasis on minimizing harm, sustaining resilience, and upholding moral and legal standards in their actions across various military operations.

To know more about collateral damage, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14316060

#SPJ11

Answer:

Its A

Explanation:

The statement "During the 15th century, the sackbut was com-monly performed at outdoor gather-ings during renaissance period." is False beca-use of its small-er size, the sackbut differs from the mo-dern trombone.

Sackbut (some-times sackbutt or sagbutt): a differ-ent name for the trombone, which re-placed the slide trumpet by the mid-dle of the 15th century. The sack-but differs from today's trom-bone by its small-er bore, its bell which is less fla-red, and in the lack of a water key, slide lock, and tun-ing slide on the bell curve. Sack-buts could ad-just tuning at the joint bet-ween the bell and slide. The shallow brass mouth-piece was un-plated.

To know more about renaissance period click below:

brainly.com/question/30358444

#SPJ4

Answer:

The answer is C. On a grid

Explanation:

I really hope this helps you. I've already had this question and I got it right, so you should get it right as well. I apologize that I don't have a better explanation.

Answer:

C. On a grid

Explanation:

Tired Tired Tired Tired Tired

Answer:

Effects of Imperialism -

Imperialism is when a mother country takes over a smaller nation or colony for political, social, and/or economic reasons.  Imperialism has been a major force in shaping the modern world.  The effects of Imperialism have been interpreted from a variety of viewpoints.  This major Imperialism occurred during the late 19th Century and early 20th century.  It had more negative effects in the modern world today then positive effects.

A positive effect is seen in document one called "Modern Progressive Nations," it shows how the larger nations gave to the smaller colonies.  The nations built them roads, canals, and railways.  Showed them the telegraph, newspaper, established schools for them, gave them the blessing of their civilization, and overall made them economized.  They were part of modern culture after this occurred.  Another positive effect is seen in document three called "Colonial Governments and Missionaries. " It shows how the colonial governments introduced improved medical care, and better methods of sanitation.  There were new crops; tools and farming methods, which helped, increase food production.  These changes meant less death to smaller colonies, and overall improve the state of living.  They now could live longer and have better sanitation compared to the earlier imperialism.

A negative effect is seen document two-called "Colonization."  In the picture you can see that the colonies doing the mother countrys hard work did not civilize the smaller colonies.  They were put to work as cheap labor.  They had no freedom, had to do what the mother country said since it has so much towering power over them, they were exploited and were taken advantage of.  Another negative effect is seen in document four called "Missionaries."  In this quote you can see that when the white people came to the Africans they had nothing but power over them.  They came with the Bible and no land, and instead took their land and forced the religion Christianity upon them.   In document five-called "The White Man," another negative effect occurs.  In this little tale or quote, David Diop talks about how the whites came and killed the innocent.  This had many negative effects on Africa such as the African's were put to work as slaves but more like cheap labor.  Many of them dies from this, they were resettled, exploited, weren't taken at their free will and took all of their land.  The last negative effect can be seen in document seven called "The German Cartoon." This cartoon shows how severely the presence of imperialism affected such continents as Africa.  The man in the machine is being forced to drink hard liquor and alcohol, they were corrupted and given evil minds, their money was all taken away, and most of all religion was forced upon them.

Imperialism is never considered as a good cause and effect.  At first when it occurs it may seem as a positive effect, but in the long run, for example in this case it was a negative effect.  All Africans and Asians were heavily exploited and were given no rights to do anything even though the mother countries gave them modern culture.  Colonies inside colonies would fight because they wanted independence and have their own government and rule.  There were many ethnics group that had nationalistic feelings but could not accomplish anything and become a free nation because of Imperialism.  The mother country's that did the taking over were only after a few things and unfortunately did happen to accomplish what they were after.  They wanted raw materials, markets for goods, national glory, balance of power and they also felt as though they needed to help smaller nations as though it was their burden, which Europeans called "White Man's Burden."  In their point of view they thought they were helping people but really all they were doing was hurting the smaller colonies.  Mother countries were destroying ethnic groups and causing civil wars between smaller nations.  This newer modern Imperialism was never productive.  

When a mother country took over a smaller colony for economic, political or social reason, they were Imperialistic.  As shown they changed the modern world plenty and pretty much made it a harder world to live in at that time.  It all depends on which viewpoints you may look at.  Some may think it was a positive thing but overall, it only led to things in this world that were negative.  Even thought the modern Imperialism occurred no more then 100 years ago, it still affects us greatly, and how our nation is broken down.

Explanation:

there's your essay

The imperialism had both positive and negative effects.

Positive effects- The imperialism promoted the technological and educational development in the colonial country. They established schools, industries, railways, telegraph for development.

Negative effect- The imperialism destroyed the local handicraft of the colonial nation and also started destroying the local religion and customs and promoted Christianity through missionaries.

Religion is a set of organized beliefs, practices, and systems that most often relate to the belief and worship of a controlling force, such as a personal god or another supernatural being.

Religion often involves cultural beliefs, worldviews, texts, prophecies, revelations, and morals that have spiritual meaning to members of the particular faith, and it can encompass a range of practices, including sermons, rituals, prayer, meditation, holy places, symbols, trances, and feasts.

It is also commonly regarded as consisting of the way people deal with ultimate concerns about their lives and their fate after death.

Learn more about religion here:

https://brainly.com/question/4791540

#SPJ2

Militiamen fired at British soldiers from the woods at the Battle of Concord. Option 2 is Correct.

However, it's worth noting that the Battle of Concord was fought during the American Revolutionary War, and it involved British soldiers encountering resistance from American colonists who were armed and fighting for their independence. So, any of the options could potentially be correct.  Militiamen are citizens who are trained and organized to provide military service to their country in times of emergency or war.

They are typically part-time soldiers who are not full-time members of the regular armed forces, but who are called upon to serve when necessary. In the United States, the National Guard is the primary organization responsible for maintaining a militia force. Militias have a long history in many countries, and are often associated with defending against external threats or upholding domestic order.  Option 2 is Correct.

Learn more about Militiamen visit: brainly.com/question/30783469

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

who fired at british soldiers from the woods at the battle of concord?

1. french troops

2. militiamen

3. native americans

4. politicians

Answer:

Delegates were chosen by each state's legislature. The Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia met to address the problems of the weak central government that existed under the Articles of Confederation (poor finances, states' power over federal, no army, etc.)

Answer:

C. Pardon people who have committed federal crimes

Explanation:

Answer: The service of African-Americans in the military had dramatic implications for African-Americans. Black soldiers faced systemic racial discrimination in the army and endured virulent hostility upon returning to their homes at the end of the war.

Explanation:

Answer:

He's asking if you should change every little fault and follow him like the directions to a hidden treasure.

Explanation:

Answer: Cricket

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I studied this in the fifth grade and I'm in middle school

Answer:

The National Assembly Conversing about the future of France

Human Ingenuity is the way which human minds operate, influencing how humans behave, interact and find solutions to problems. The French revolution is a clear example in history in which Human Ingenuity is used. We can observe that we, as humans, cannot stand the violation of one's own rights, causing us to protest to the one's suppressing us and when we reached a certain point of frustration, or realise the futile attempts of protesting, we will then act and upthrow the person in charge. It is only nature for us to do so and the only times humans unite and cooperate with one another is either under a common interest or cause.

Conflict between Paris and the king's men

The French Revolution has caused dramatic changes throughout France, paving way for a new order contradictory to that of the monarchy system used before it. At the time before the revolution, France was considered to be a nation cast in chaos and in the process of downfall due to its economic instability and wealth gaps between different social classes. The new creation of the middle class and the unity of the revolution managed to stabilise the economic conditions and unite most of the country, once again on the path to becoming a global superpower. The class previously known as peasants in France benefited most from the revolution, as the use of a metric system in France is implemented shifting from absolute control of the nobles over the majority of the population to republicanism and nationalism, the belief in which the control of a country belongs to all the people living in it. After the revolution, occupations and jobs are free to all male applicants, allowing those that are ambitious to succeed, giving rise to the more talented. The military has also changed, instead of rankings based on class, achievements during war is the sole evaluation of a solider. However, notice that even though the revolution emphasises on change for the entire nation, only men are benefited. Equality of women would not be introduced until much later in the course of history.

Explanation:

pls make me braniest if I'm right

The sexual revolution of the 1960s is likely to have an impact on the sexuality of the incoming population of the elderly.

This revolution, characterized by increased sexual freedom and a shift in societal attitudes toward sexuality, may result in a more open and accepting environment for exploring and expressing sexuality among the elderly. However, the specific impact can vary depending on various factors such as cultural norms, generational attitudes, and individual experiences.

The sexual revolution of the 1960s marked a significant shift in societal attitudes toward sexuality, challenging traditional norms and promoting greater sexual freedom. This cultural movement emphasized the importance of individual autonomy and sexual liberation, leading to changes in sexual behaviors and practices. As a result, the incoming population of the elderly, who were influenced by the sexual revolution during their formative years, may carry forward some of the attitudes and beliefs that emerged during that time.

One potential impact is that the elderly may experience a more open and accepting environment for their sexual expression. The sexual revolution helped to break down taboos and stigmas surrounding sexuality, creating a more permissive culture that acknowledges and respects diverse sexual orientations, desires, and needs. This can provide older individuals with a greater sense of freedom and acceptance in exploring and expressing their own sexuality.

However, it is important to note that the impact of the sexual revolution on the elderly's sexuality can be influenced by various factors. Cultural norms and generational attitudes towards sexuality can vary, affecting how individuals perceive and approach their own sexual desires and relationships. Additionally, individual experiences and personal factors such as health, mobility, and availability of partners can also shape the expression of sexuality in older age.

In conclusion, the sexual revolution of the 1960s is likely to have an impact on the sexuality of the incoming population of the elderly. While it may contribute to a more open and accepting environment for exploring and expressing sexuality, the specific impact can vary depending on cultural norms, generational attitudes, and individual experiences. It is important to recognize and support the diverse needs and desires of older individuals as they navigate their own sexual well-being in light of their unique historical and personal contexts.

To learn more about Sexual revolution click here: brainly.com/question/32222750

#SPJ11

Answer:

maybe that they were being treated like slaves

Explanation:

The United States' cold war foreign policy in Asia and Latin America shared certain similarities. One common aspect was the containment strategy employed against the spread of communism.

The United States viewed the spread of communism as a threat to its own interests and sought to prevent its expansion globally. In both regions, the United States supported anti-communist regimes and intervened militarily to counter communist influences.

In Asia, the United States engaged in the Korean War (1950-1953) and the Vietnam War (1955-1975) to prevent the spread of communism, supporting South Korea and South Vietnam respectively. Similarly, in Latin America, the United States intervened militarily and supported various anti-communist governments during the Cold War.

Examples include the interventions in Guatemala (1954) and the Dominican Republic (1965). Economically, the United States pursued policies of economic integration and trade liberalization in both regions. In Latin America, this was exemplified by the establishment of the Organization of American States (OAS) and initiatives such as the Alliance for Progress, which aimed to promote economic development and counter communist influences.

know more about cold war here:

https://brainly.com/question/856013

#SPJ8

Answer: They had a large influence. They helped to create more fair conditions for Black workers and people living in the South during Reconstruction. They also changed the party balance, the Republican party seats were mostly occupied by Black people, and the Republicans became the dominant party, and remain so.

Explanation:

A cartoon is a type of visual art that is often produced in an exaggerated or semi-realistic manner and frequently animated.

What is the cartoon's central theme?

An irate, belligerent individual like Hitler was motivated to wage war because of anything in the conditions of the Versailles Treaty.

By treating Germany unfairly in these three ways—reducing their army, denying them territory, and placing all the blame on them—the Treaty of Versailles contributed to the outbreak of World War II.

Today, cartoons are mostly utilized in periodicals and newspapers for visual wit and social comedy as well as political commentary and editorial opinion.

To learn more about Cartoon refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/27174550

#SPJ13

The Second Industrial Revolution had a significant impact on the Trans-Mississippi West. This era saw an increase in industrialization, which led to advancements in transportation, communication, and production. Additionally, there was a significant increase in population and migration towards the western region.The following are the effects of the second industrial revolution on the trans-Mississippi West:1. The growth of railroads - The expansion of railroads significantly increased transportation efficiency, making it easier and cheaper to transport goods and people across the West. It allowed the West to link up with the rest of the nation and facilitated westward expansion.

2. Agricultural production - The introduction of farm machinery such as the reaper, combine, and thresher made it easier to cultivate vast stretches of land, which, in turn, increased crop yields.

Know more about Industrial Revolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/32280733

#SPJ11

Answer:

Thousands of people left east Germany. the cultural Revolution set back China's modernization because Mao believed that was more important.

What happened when Hungary opened its borders is: Thousands of people left East Germany.

When the border was open  by Hungary  or when they remove the regulation they placed on the border many people left east Germany and move to West Germany during that period.

The border opening also enables people to go to Austria  to buy or purchase goods.

Therefore thousands of people left East Germany.

Learn more about What happened when Hungary opened its borders here:https://brainly.com/question/2696116

#SPJ11