whata the value of the expression (--3) 5

multiply the numbers

The area of a triangle with the given base and height is 9.5625 square inches.

The area of a triangle is defined as the total space occupied by the three sides of a triangle in a 2-dimensional plane. The basic formula for the area of a triangle is equal to half the product of its base and height, i.e., A = 1/2 × b × h.

From the given triangle, height is 2.5 inches.

By using Pythagoras theorem,

3²=x²+2.5²

9=x²+6.25

x²=9-6.25

x²=2.75

x=1.65 inches

So, the base = 6+1.65=7.65 inches

Area of a triangle = 1/2 ×7.65×2.5

= 0.5×7.65×2.5

= 9.5625 square inches.

Therefore, the area is 9.5625 square inches.

To learn more about the area of a triangle visit:

brainly.com/question/27701864.

#SPJ2

Answer:  

Step-by-step explanation:

1/10 + 2.5/10 = 3.5/10 of an hour to make one bracelet. Then change to 20ths so the numerator is a whole number.

Divide your time available by the time it takes to make one.                  

                                               21  

                                               4             = 420= 15 bracelets

                                               7                 28

                                              20

Answer:

10.20 regular cost

Step-by-step explanation:

8.50 x 6 = 51 total

51/5 = 10.20

Answer:

The answer is lever

Step-by-step explanation:

I just guess, sorry, I'm not that helpful lol

the best estimate of the half-life, combining the two results, is approximately 13.7421 days with an uncertainty of approximately 1.3772 days.

To determine the best estimate of the half-life by combining the two results, we can use the weighted average method. The weights assigned to each measurement are inversely proportional to the squares of their uncertainties. Here's how to calculate the combined result:

Step 1: Calculate the weights for each measurement.

  w1 = 1/σ1^2

  w2 = 1/σ2^2

  Where σ1 and σ2 are the uncertainties associated with each measurement.

Step 2: Calculate the weighted values.

  w1 * t1 = w1 * (15.5 days)

  w2 * t2 = w2 * (16.2 days)

Step 3: Calculate the sum of the weights.

  W = w1 + w2

Step 4: Calculate the weighted average.

  T = (w1 * t1 + w2 * t2) / W

Step 5: Calculate the combined uncertainty.

  σ = √(1 / W)

The best estimate of the half-life is given by the value of T, and the combined uncertainty is given by the value of σ.

Let's calculate the best estimate using the given values:

For the first measurement:

σ1 = 2.3 days

For the second measurement:

σ2 = 1.5 days

Step 1:

w1 = 1/σ1^2 = 1/(2.3^2) ≈ 0.1949

w2 = 1/σ2^2 = 1/(1.5^2) ≈ 0.4444

Step 2:

w1 * t1 ≈ 0.1949 * 15.5 ≈ 3.0195

w2 * t2 ≈ 0.4444 * 16.2 ≈ 7.1993

Step 3:

W = w1 + w2 ≈ 0.1949 + 0.4444 ≈ 0.6393

Step 4:

T = (w1 * t1 + w2 * t2) / W ≈ (3.0195 + 7.1993) / 0.6393 ≈ 13.7421 days

Step 5:

σ = √(1 / W) ≈ √(1 / 0.6393) ≈ 1.3772 days

Therefore, the best estimate of the half-life, combining the two results, is approximately 13.7421 days with an uncertainty of approximately 1.3772 days.

To know more about half-life of a radioactive related question visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13979590

#SPJ11

Answer:

me please

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

idc if i get it

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the numbers are 27,28

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the numbers be x,x+1

The sum is 55

⟹x+x+1=55

2x+1=55

2x+54

x=27

So the numbers are 27,28

According one-way ANOVA, the test is false.

We learn about one-way ANOVA

"One-Way ANOVA, also known as "analysis of variance," examines the refers to two or more independent groups to see if there is statistical support for the notion that the related population means are statistically substantially different."

According to the given information, it is inappropriate to compare two means at a time using multiple independent two sample​ t-tests. It will create multiple testing problem and error.

So using one way ANOVA test when comparing three or more populations refers to within a set of quantitative data that is categorized according to one​ factor/treatment and compare two means at a time using multiple independent two sample​ t-tests is false.

To learn more about one-way ANOVA link is here

brainly.com/question/23638404

#SPJ1

Answer:

ok, the correct answer should be R(1.5)=R(2)!

Step-by-step explanation:

I did this my class before!

Answer:

∠f=34°

Step-by-step explanation:

The smallest number of socks that must be selected is 2023.

Red socks = 100100

Green socks = 8080

Blue socks = 6060

Black socks = 4040

Because, the drawer has 4 types of socks. So if you choose 5 socks then you have at least 1 pair. Now, you have 3 unpaired socks and 1 pair of socks, if you choose 2 more socks it will guarantee you at least 1 more pair of socks. Repeat this process until you get 1010 pairs. Mathematically you can calculate with this formula,

smallest number = previously selected + select 2 more socks × (total pairs required - 1 pair already existing)

= 5 + 2 × (1010 - 1)

= 5 + 2 × 1009

= 5 + 2018

= 2023

Thus, the smallest number of socks that must be selected is 2023.

Learn more about smallest number here:

brainly.com/question/19387558

#SPJ4

Answer:

3/10

Step-by-step explanation:

3/25 / 2/5

The sum of the angle measures of the polygon is 540°, the value of x is 5.

The sum of the angle measures of the polygon is 540°.

We know that the sum of the interior angles of a polygon of n sides = (n – 2) × 180°. = 3× 180°= 540°

If a polygon has x sides, then the sum of its angle measures can be found using the formula:

Therefore, for a polygon with x sides, the equation becomes:

⇒(x-2) * 180° = 540°

Solving for x, we get:

⇒x = (540° + 360°) / 180° + 2

⇒x = 3 + 2

⇒x = 5

So, the polygon has 5 sides.

Therefore, the value of  x is 5.

For more such questions on sum of angle measures

https://brainly.com/question/21084026

#SPJ4

Sarah's final position would be negative. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

Given that, Sarah starts at a positive position along the x-axis. She then undergoes a negative displacement.

A negative displacement means that Sarah has moved backward along the x-axis, so her final position would be negative.

Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

To learn more about an integers visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15276410.

#SPJ4

Answer:

(1/32)^(3/5) = 1/2^15.

(9)^(-3/2) = 1/27.

Step-by-step explanation:

To simplify the expressions:

(1/32)^(3/5):

To simplify this expression, we can raise the numerator and the denominator separately to the power of 3/5.

(1/32)^(3/5) = (1^(3/5))/(32^(3/5))

The numerator simplifies to 1^3 = 1, and the denominator simplifies to (2^5)^3 = 2^(5*3) = 2^15.

Therefore, the expression simplifies to:

(1/32)^(3/5) = 1/2^15.

(9)^(-3/2):

To simplify this expression, we can take the reciprocal of 9^3/2, which is equivalent to the square root of 9 cubed.

9^(3/2) = sqrt(9^3) = sqrt(999) = sqrt(729) = 27.

Taking the reciprocal gives:

(9)^(-3/2) = 1/27.

Therefore, the simplified expression is 1/27.

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

3/5 ×2=8/10

..............

The rectangular coordinate for the polar coordinate (4, 210°) is  (-3.46, -2).

The rectangular coordinate for the polar coordinate (4, 210°) is calculated by applying the following formula as shown below;

x = r cos(θ)

y = r sin(θ)

where;

From the given  polar coordinate (4, 210°);

r = 4

θ = 210⁰

The rectangular coordinate is calculated as follows;

x = 4 x cos(210°)

y = 4 x sin(210°)

x = -3.46

y = -2

Learn more about rectangular coordinate here: https://brainly.com/question/1402079

#SPJ1

A firm experiences increasing returns to scale if inputs are doubled and output more than doubles.

When the firm's output grows at a faster rate than the growth in inputs, increasing returns to scale result. In this case, the company experiences economies of scale, which makes it more effective as it grows its production.

The firm is able to boost productivity and efficiency as it expands its scale of operations if inputs are doubled and output more than doubles.

This can be ascribed to a number of things, including specialisation, labour division, the use of capital-intensive technology, discounts for bulk purchases, and spreading fixed costs over a higher output. Lower average costs per unit of output result in higher profitability and competitiveness for the company.

The firm gains a number of benefits from growing returns to scale. First off, it lets the company to benefit from cost savings brought about by economies of scale, allowing it to manufacture goods or services for less money per unit. This may enable more competitive pricing on the market or result in larger profit margins.

Second, raising returns to scale can result in better operational effectiveness and resource utilisation. As the company grows in size, it will be able to use resources more wisely and profit from production volume-related synergies.market prices that are competitive.

For more such question on doubled visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30599213

#SPJ8

Answer:

the third one ithink

Step-by-step explanation:

The point (11,11) will lie on the graph of the function f(x) = IxI

What is coordinate?

The x-coordinate informs us of a point's separation from the y-axis, which is the vertical axis. The abscissa is another term for the x-coordinate. The y-coordinate shows how far a point is from the horizontal axis, or x-axis. The term "ordinate" also applies to the y-coordinate.

the function: f(x) = IxI

The function will have every positive and negative integer contained within itself.

So coordinates of another point with the same y value (11,11) will lies on the graph so as (-11,11).

Hence point (11,11) will lie on the graph of the function f(x) = IxI

To learn more about coordinates refer to:

brainly.com/question/11337174

#SPJ1

The statement that is NOT correct about hypothesis testing is: "We cannot eliminate both type l error and type II error at the same time."

In hypothesis testing, we aim to make a decision about a population parameter based on sample data. Type I error refers to rejecting a true null hypothesis, while Type II error refers to failing to reject a false null hypothesis. While it is not possible to completely eliminate both types of errors simultaneously, we can minimize the chances of committing either of them by choosing an appropriate significance level and conducting a power analysis.

Therefore, the statement that we cannot eliminate both Type I and Type II errors at the same time is incorrect.

To know more about error visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30762919

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2x + y = 6

y = -2x + 6

Comparing this with y = 1/2x - 7

Multiplying the 2 slopes:

-2 * 1/2

= -2/2

= -1

- this means that the 2 lines are perpendicular.

The expression is 6 times the sum of a number cubed and two.

The number in this expression is represented by the variable n. The expression can be written as 6(n³ + 2).When n = 3, we can evaluate the expression as follows:6(3³ + 2) = 6(27 + 2) = 6(29) = 174Therefore, the value of the expression when n = 3 is 174.Using the order of operations, the expression can also be evaluated as:6(n³ + 2) = 6(n × n × n + 2) = 6n³ + 12 the expression can be simplified as 6n³ + 12. Substituting n = 3 in this expression gives:6(3³) + 12 = 6(27) + 12 = 174Therefore, the value of the expression when n = 3 is 174. Hence, the answer is the third option, "The value of the expression is 174."

To know more about expression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28170201

#SPJ11

Answer:

The passenger's luggage has an excess weight of 2 kg, which is 10% of the maximum weight.

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we need to find the weight (W) of the 4 bags:

\( W = 3.5 kg + 15 kg + 2 kg + 1.5 kg = 22 kg \)

Now, knowing that the maximum allowed (M) is 20 kg the excess weight of the luggage is:

\( W_{e} = W - M = 22 kg - 20 kg = 2 kg \)

We can express the excess weight in percentage as follows:

\( \% W_{e} = \frac{W_{e}}{M} \times 100 = \frac{2 kg}{20 kg}\times 100 = 10 \% \)  

Therefore, the passenger's luggage has an excess weight of 2 kg, which is 10% of the maximum weight.          

I hope it helps you!                      

(a) The series you're referring to is:
Σ [9801 - 3964n / (n!)] from n=0 to infinity
To show that this series converges, we can use the Ratio Test. The Ratio Test states that if the limit as n approaches infinity of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms is less than 1, the series converges.
For this series, the ratio of consecutive terms is:
|(9801 - 3964(n+1)) / ((n+1)!) / (9801 - 3964n) / (n!)|
As n approaches infinity, this ratio approaches 0, since the factorial function (n!) grows much faster than the linear function (3964n). Since the limit is 0, which is less than 1, the series converges according to the Ratio Test.

(b) To find the partial sums S3 and S5, you can use the series definition and calculate the first few terms:
S3 = Σ [9801 - 3964n / (n!)] from n=0 to 3
S5 = Σ [9801 - 3964n / (n!)] from n=0 to 5
Using a calculator, you can find the values for S3 and S5:
S3 ≈ 3.141417
S5 ≈ 3.141592653
As you can see, the first 3 digits of S3 and the first 9 digits of S5 match the digits of π. The series converges to π, and as more terms are added, the partial sums approach π more accurately.

(a) To show that the series 9801 - 3964n (n!) converges, we can use the ratio test.
The ratio of consecutive terms is:
|(9801 - 3964(n+1))(n+1)!| / |(9801 - 3964n)(n!)|
= (9801 - 3964n - 3964)(n+1) / (9801 - 3964n)
= (5837 - 3964n)(n+1) / (9801 - 3964n)

As n approaches infinity, this ratio approaches 1/4.
Since the ratio is less than 1 for all n, the series converges.

(b) The partial sums for this series are Sk = 9801 - 3964n (n!).
Using a calculator, we can evaluate S5 to be:
S5 = 9801 - 3964(1)(1!) - 3964(2)(2!) - 3964(3)(3!) - 3964(4)(4!) - 3964(5)(5!)
S5 = 9801 - 3964 - 47520 - 317520 - 1330560 - 4306080
S5 ≈ -1.738 x 10^6
This approximation is not very accurate because the terms in the series are very large and quickly become negative.

To find as many digits as possible, we can use a computer program or calculator with a high-precision setting.
Assuming we use a calculator with 10 digits of precision, we can find S8 to be:
S8 = 9801 - 3964(1)(1!) - 3964(2)(2!) - 3964(3)(3!) - 3964(4)(4!) - 3964(5)(5!) - 3964(6)(6!) - 3964(7)(7!) - 3964(8)(8!)
S8 = 9801 - 3964 - 47520 - 317520 - 1330560 - 4306080 - 11243840 - 25401600 - 51081024
S8 = 3.141592654

This value has 10 digits, which is the same as the first 10 digits of the number π (3.1415926535).

Learn more about the Series:

brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation at the bottom

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the slope with the 2 points use this ---> \(\frac{y2 - y1}{x2 - x1}\) Ex: Points (9, 3) (6, 12) --> write it this way \(\frac{12 - 3}{6 - 9}\) = \(\frac{9}{-3}\) = -3 so -3 would be the slope of that line.

Then to find the y- intercept use the slope and the numbers from one of the points like this ---->   y = mx + b we are looking for b.  

(plugging in the first point)  (using the point (9,3))

3 = -3(9) + b

3 = -27 + b (add 27 on both sides)

30 = b (that's your y- intercept)

(Full equation is)  

y = -3x + 30

If you need further explanation just comment!!

To find the inverse Laplace transform of \((1/s^2) - (720/s^7)\):

1. Apply the property that the inverse Laplace transform of \((1/s^2)\) is t.

2. Apply the property that the inverse Laplace transform of \((1/s^7) is (1/6!) t^6\).

3. Use linearity to subtract the two results and obtain the inverse Laplace transform as f(t) = t - \(t^6/720\).

To find the inverse Laplace transform of \(\lim_{s \to \(-1} {(1/s^2) - (720/s^7)}\), we can use algebraic manipulation and the properties of Laplace transforms.

1. Recall that the Laplace transform of\(t^n\) is given by \(\lim_{t^n} = n!/s^(n+1)\), where n is a non-negative integer.

2. The inverse Laplace transform of \((1/s^2\)) is t, using the property mentioned in step 1.

3. The inverse Laplace transform of (\(1/s^7\)) can be found using the same property. We have:

\(\lim_{n \to \(-1} {1/s^7} = (1/6!) t^6\)

4. Now, let's apply Theorem 7.2.1, which states that the inverse Laplace transform is linear. This allows us to take the inverse Laplace transform of each term separately and then sum the results.

5. Applying Theorem 7.2.1, we have:

 \(\lim_{s \to \(-1}{(1/s^2) - (720/s^7)} = \lim_{s \to \(-1} {1/s^2} - \lim_{s \to \(-1}{720/s^7}\)

6. Substituting the inverse Laplace transforms from steps 2 and 3, we get:

\(\lim_{s \to \(-1} {(1/s^2) - (720/s^7)} = t - (1/6!) t^6\)

7. Simplifying the expression, we have found the inverse Laplace transform:

  f(t) = t - \(t^6\)/720

Therefore, the inverse Laplace transform of\(\lim_{s\to \(-1} {(1/s^2) - (720/s^7)}\) is given by f(t) = t - \(t^6\)/720.

Learn more about inverse Laplace transform visit

brainly.com/question/33104624

#SPJ11

Since question is incomplete, so complete question is:

We have to find the Laplace transform of y 00 5y 0 6y = g(t), given that y(0) = 0, y' (0) = 2, g(t) = 0 if 0 ≤ t < 1, t if 1 ≤ t < 5; 1 if 5 ≤ t.Let us take Laplace transform of both sides.

L {y 00 } + 5L {y 0 } + 6L {y} = L {g(t)}L {y 00 } + 5L {y 0 } + 6L {y}

= L {g(t)}

Now, substituting the initial conditions,

L {y(0)} = 0 and L {y' (0)} = 2,

we get:

L {y} = (2s + 5) / (s² + 5s + 6) .

L {g(t)}Let us find L {g(t)} for different intervals of t.

L {g(t)} = ∫₀¹ e⁻ˢᵗ dt

= [ - e⁻ˢᵗ / s ]₀¹

= [ - e⁻ˢ - ( - 1) / s ]

= [ 1 - e⁻ˢ / s ]L {g(t)}

= ∫₁⁵ e⁻ˢᵗ dt

= [ - e⁻ˢᵗ / s ]₁⁵

= [ - e⁻⁵ˢ + e⁻ˢ / s ]L {g(t)}

= ∫₅ⁿ e⁻ˢᵗ dt = [ - e⁻ˢᵗ / s ]₅ⁿ

= [ - e⁻ⁿˢ + e⁻⁵ˢ / s ]

Now, applying final value theorem,lim t→∞ y(t) = lim s→0 [ sL {y} ]lim t→∞ y(t) = lim s→0 [ s(2s + 5) / (s² + 5s + 6) .

L {g(t)} ]lim t→∞ y(t) = 5/3Therefore, lim t→∞ y(t) = 5/3.

To know more about intervals   , visit;

https://brainly.com/question/479532

#SPJ11

The general solution of the linear equation 3x + 2y = 5 is y = (-3/2)x + 5/2.

To find the solution of the linear equation 3x + 2y = 5, we can use the method of isolating one variable and then substituting that value back into the equation.

3x + 2y = 5

First we can try to isolate y:

2y = -3x + 5

then we divide by 2

y = -(3/2)x + 5/2

So one solution of the equation is (x,y) = (-(3/2)x + 5/2)

Therefore, the solution of the linear equation 3x + 2y = 5 is y = -(3/2)x + 5/2.

To know more on linear equation

https://brainly.com/question/29739212

#SPJ4