The criminal justice system is not often effective in dealing with acts that occur in prison because the nature of the prison environment creates unique challenges that cannot be easily addressed through traditional criminal justice methods. The internal sanction that can be used by prison officials to control behaviour within the prison is the use of disciplinary measures or administrative segregation.
The criminal justice system is often not effective in dealing with acts that occur in prison for several reasons:
1. Overcrowding: Prisons are often overcrowded, making it difficult for the criminal justice system to effectively investigate and prosecute each case.
2. Limited resources: Both prisons and the criminal justice system have limited resources, which can make it challenging to handle all incidents that occur within prisons.
3. Fear of retaliation: Inmates may be reluctant to report incidents or cooperate with investigations due to fear of retaliation from other inmates.
4. Inmate subculture: The prison environment can foster a code of conduct that discourages cooperation with authorities and reporting of incidents.
5. Difficulty proving cases: Gathering evidence in a prison setting can be challenging, making it difficult to prove cases beyond a reasonable doubt.
An internal sanction that can be used by prison officials to control behaviour within the prison is administrative segregation. This involves isolating an inmate from the general population and placing them in a separate unit, often with increased security measures and limited privileges. This can serve as a deterrent for engaging in criminal acts within the prison and also protect the inmate from potential retaliation.
Another type of internal sanction that can be used by prison officials to control behaviour within the prison is the use of disciplinary measures. This can include measures such as loss of privileges, isolation, or even transfer to a higher security unit. These measures are often more effective than traditional criminal justice methods because they are designed to target specific behaviours and address them in a more focused and proactive manner. Additionally, disciplinary measures are typically administered by prison officials who have a more nuanced understanding of the unique challenges of the prison environment and can tailor their responses accordingly.
Learn more about Prison: https://brainly.com/question/22650492.
#SPJ11
A buyer entered into a written contract with a seller to purchase his commercial property for $100,000. The contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed, and made no mention of easements or reservations. The closing was set for November 25, three months from the signing of the contract. Shortly thereafter, the buyer obtained a survey of the property, which revealed that the city had an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Because this actually enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not mention it to the seller. Subsequently, the buyer found a better location for her business. On November 1, the buyer notified the seller that she no longer intended to purchase the property. The seller told her that he intended to hold her to her contract. At closing, the buyer refused to tender the purchase price, claiming that the seller's title is unmarketable and citing the sidewalk easement as proof of that fact. In a suit for specific performance, will the seller likely prevail? A: Yes, because the contract did not specify the quality of title to be conveyed. B: Yes, because the buyer was aware of the visible easement and it enhanced the value of the property. C: No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders title unmarketable. D: No, because the buyer gave the seller sufficient notice of her change in plans and yet he made no effort to try to find another purchaser.
No, because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable.
The presence of an easement that was not addressed in the contract renders the title unmarketable, as stated in option C. As a result, the seller will not likely prevail in a suit for specific performance.
Specific performance is a legal concept where a court orders one party to perform a specific act. It is frequently employed in contract law cases. The goal of specific performance is to make the contract come to life. Specific performance is a legally binding contract remedy that allows a party to force the other party to perform their contractual obligations. According to the case mentioned, in a suit for specific performance, the seller is unlikely to prevail because an easement not provided for in the contract renders the title unmarketable. The buyer found out that there was an easement for the public sidewalk that ran in front of the store. Although it enhanced the value of the property, the buyer did not tell the seller about it.
The seller could hold the buyer to the contract, but the buyer refused to tender the purchase price because the title is unmarketable, citing the sidewalk easement as proof. Furthermore, the contract did not specify the quality of the title to be conveyed, nor did it mention easements or reservations.
Read more about valid binding contract in terms of performance here:
https://brainly.com/question/32959753
#SPJ11
What are your thoughts on this interview? Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments? If you had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, which would you choose?
I believe the interview of Richard Clarke was meaningful as he gave some in-depth knowledge of what is happening in the Department of Homeland Security.
Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments?Yes he does because he stated that due to the reason of the White House not nominating the senior managers to replace those who were said to have left. the homeland security is said to be leaderless.
If you had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, which would you choose?If I had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, i will chose to keep it the same as it is the right thing to do, splitting will lead to more cost. The best thing is keeping it the same and appointment of leadership head.
Therefore, I believe the interview of Richard Clarke was meaningful as he gave some in-depth knowledge of what is happening in the Department of Homeland Security.
Learn more about Homeland Security from
https://brainly.com/question/850432
#SPJ1
how many justices currently sit on the supreme court
Answer:
nine justices
Explanation:
There are currently nine justices on the Supreme Court, though that number is not set in the Constitution and has changed throughout history. There are eight associate justices, and one chief justice. Supreme Court justices are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. They serve a life term.
populism arises when citizens are frustrated with politics that are focused on the needs and interests are
Populism arises when citizens are frustrated with politics that are focused on the needs and interests are it has institutions such as a parliament, prime minister, or other public officials.
It is frequently associated with anti-established order and anti-political sentiment. The term developed inside the late nineteenth century and has been applied to numerous politicians, events and movements considering that that point, frequently as a pejorative.
The Populist motion changed into a rise up through farmers within the South and Midwest in opposition to the Democratic and Republican events for ignoring their pastimes and difficulties. For over a decade, farmers had been suffering from crop disasters, falling charges, negative advertising, and lack of credit score facilities.
Farmers inside the South and Midwest revolted against the Democratic and Republican parties for ignoring their concerns and issues, resulting in the Populist movement. Charismatic or influential figures who gift themselves as the "voice of the people" regularly lead
They demanded an increase within the circulating forex (to be executed by the limitless coinage of silver), a graduated earnings tax, authorities possession of the railroads, a tariff for sales simplest, the direct election of U.S. senators, and different measures designed to bolster political democracy and deliver farmers .
Learn more about Populism arises here
https://brainly.com/question/11716977
#SPJ4
A narrative case report consists of the following elements:
Select one:
a. Introduction, reporting party/victim statement, witness
statement(s), conclusion
b. Face sheet, witness statement(s), facts of the case,
conclusion
c. Introduction, your opinion, facts of the case, suspect
statement(s), conclusion
d. Face sheet, reporting party/victim statement, witness
statement(s), your opinion, facts of the case
e. Face sheet, introduction, reporting party/victim statement,
witness statement(s), facts of the case, suspect statement(s),
conclusion
Plzz help
Which two sentences in the scenario show
some of the symptoms of stress among law
enforcement, correctional, and public
security workers?
1, Not only has she started drinking copious
amounts of alcohol, but she's also started
smoking excessively.
2, Ruiz put on a charming and witty façade
at a recent family dinner to quell her
parents' worries about her.
3, It's become impossible for her to get a
good night's sleep-she fears she's
developing insomnia.
4, However, Ruiz is still hopeful. She's
planning to visit her counselor to improve
her mental and physical health.
Answer:
Not only has she started drinking copious amounts of alcohol, but she's also started smoking excessively
Of the following, turnout among young voters is likely to be highest among
black educated females
low-income male college students
young white, non-Hispanic males
non-college factory workers
Answer:
Black educated females
How do I answer What duties do you believe you'll be conducting as a Police Officer?
Answer:
Duties to protect people in their cities, and to stop criminals from committing crimes; Such duties are;
Violent offenseNon- violent offenseCivil Disputes (Although a Judge is needed LEO's (Law Enforcement Officers handle some of these) Missing Children'sSo Much more
which of the following is not one of james q. wilson’s operating styles?a. watchman c. service b. legalistic d. aggressive
The option that is not one of James Q. Wilson's operating styles is (d) aggressive.
James Q. Wilson identified three operating styles of policing in his book "Varieties of Police Behavior: The Management of Law and Order in Eight Communities" - watchman, legalistic, and aggressive. The watchman style focuses on maintaining order and keeping peace, while the legalistic style emphasizes strict adherence to the law. The aggressive style involves a more proactive approach to policing. Wilson did not include the service style as one of his operating styles.
James Q. Wilson identified three main operating styles for police officers, which include (a) watchman, (b) legalistic, and (c) service styles. The aggressive style is not part of Wilson's classification.
Learn more about operating styles: https://brainly.com/question/31173064
#SPJ11
Under the provisions of the Uniform Securities Act, for willful violations, the State Administrator can:
A. institute criminal proceedings
B. impose a monetary fine
C. file suit under civil liability provisions
D. revoke registration of persons
Option d is Correct. The State Administrator may withdraw a person's registration under the Uniform Securities Act for intentional violations.
In the USA, it is illegal for an investment adviser to participate as the principal or agent in a transaction with an advising client without consent and before the trade has been settled. By submitting an application to the Director and including the information required by the Director's rules to maintain the information in the initial registration application current, a broker-dealer or investment adviser may acquire a renewal registration.
By submitting an application to the Director that includes the names of the agents or investment adviser representatives it is affiliated with and a certification that, to the best of its knowledge, information, and belief, the information in the application has not changed, a broker-dealer, investment adviser, or issuer may renew the registration of the agents or investment adviser representatives associated with it. Each renewal registration application will take effect on the later of the day it is received by the Director or the date the prior registration expires.
Learn more about Uniform Securities Act Visit: brainly.com/question/17147712
#SPJ4
What was the law or issue in Miranda V. Arizona case
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that a defendant's statements to authorities are inadmissible in court unless he has been informed of his right to have an attorney present during questioning and an understanding that anything he says will be held against him in a court of law.
When a title company issues an ALTA policy, it will extend the risk beyond that which is covered by a standard policy, to include all of the following, except:
A. the rights of parties in possession
B. unrecorded easements
C. the effect of zoning regulations
D. unrecorded mechanic's liens
When a title company issues an ALTA policy, it will extend the risk beyond that which is covered by a standard policy, to include all of the following, except: Unrecorded Mechanic's Liens. The correct option is D.
The American Land Title Association (ALTA) is the association that developed the policy. An ALTA policy is an extensive insurance policy that can protect a homeowner's interest in a property. ALTA policies usually offer increased insurance coverage than traditional home insurance policies. This policy covers most of the same issues that a typical title insurance policy would cover, such as title defects and legal ownership issues. Also, unlike a standard policy, ALTA policies extend to matters that are not included in standard insurance policies, such as unrecorded mechanic's liens. ANSWER: D. unrecorded mechanic's liensLearn more about American Land Title Association: https://brainly.com/question/28522721
#SPJ11
Foreign Policy Elaborate and Evaluate
Foreign policy refers to a government's strategy in dealing with other nations. Its effectiveness is evaluated based on its outcomes.
Foreign policy involves decisions and actions taken by a country's leaders to achieve specific goals and objectives in the international arena.
Foreign policy can be evaluated based on its effectiveness in achieving the desired outcomes. Key factors that determine the effectiveness of foreign policy include the ability to protect national security interests, promote economic development, maintain positive relationships with allies and other countries, and advance the country's values and ideals.
An effective foreign policy requires a deep understanding of global politics, economics, and culture. It also requires strong diplomatic skills, effective communication, and the ability to negotiate and compromise when necessary.
Overall, foreign policy plays a critical role in shaping a country's relationship with other nations and in promoting its interests and values on the world stage. The effectiveness of foreign policy can have a significant impact on a country's security, prosperity, and global standing.
For more such question on Foreign policy
https://brainly.com/question/2196996
#SPJ8
A defendant runs a red light and causes permanent injuries to a plaintiff. The plaintiff suffers a huge loss,
estimated at $500,000 over the course of the plaintiff's lifetime. Why might the plaintiff settle his or her claim
against the defendant for pennies on the dollar (say $10,000)?
The main reason why the plaintiff might settle his or her claim against the defendant for pennies on the dollar (say $10,000) is that the plaintiff would want to avoid a protracted court case.
What is an Out of Court Settlement?This refers to the formal agreement to resolve a case outside of the court's jurisdiction in order to pay for damages usually and avoid a protracted court case.
Hence, we can note that the estimated damages to the plaintiff which is about $500,000 in the lifetime of the plaintiff is a large sum and might not be paid, which would make the plaintiff want an out-of-court settlement to collect a sum of about $10,000.
Read more about out-of-court settlement here:
https://brainly.com/question/2783258
jerome and jana relinquish the legal right to exercise control of their 17 year old daughter meredith because
Jerome and jana relinquish the legal right to exercise control of their 17 year old daughter Meredith because of the act emancipation.
The Emancipation Proclamation was issued by President Abraham Lincoln on January 1, 1863, as the country was approaching its third year of a bloody civil war. In the rebellious states, the proclamation stated "that all persons held as slaves are, and henceforth shall be free."
Instead, it sought to abolish the extensive plantation slavery that existed in Britain's tropical colonies, where the population of slaves was frequently greater than that of the white colonists. In British North America, there were far fewer and more isolated enslaved Africans. In 1774, Rhode Island became the first state to outlaw slavery.
Learn more about Emancipation at:
brainly.com/question/29788953
#SPJ4
Question 10 (1 point)
Consent searches occur when there is an immediate threat to public safety or the risk that evidence will be
destroyed. In a consent search, officers may search, arrest, or question suspects without obtaining a warrant or
following other usual rules of criminal procedure.
True
O False
Answer:
False. Hope this helped!
Explanation:
If someone loses their court case in federal district court in Florida, they have a right to have their case heard a second time by the ______ U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals under that court's __________ jurisdiction.
Answer:
Explanation:
u
True/false. In an automobile negligence action by a plaintiff against a defendant, a bystander testified for the plaintiff. The defendant later called a witness, who testified that the bystander's reputation for truthfulness was bad
In an automobile negligence action by a plaintiff against a defendant, a bystander testified for the plaintiff. The defendant later called a witness, who testified that the bystander's reputation for truthfulness was bad is said to be True.
A witness testifying on behalf of the plaintiff in an automotive negligence lawsuit brought by the plaintiff against the defendant may be vulnerable to cross-examination over their track record of being truthful. The spectator's credibility may be questioned and the defendant's case may be strengthened if the defendant later summons a witness who attests that the bystander has a poor reputation for being truthful.
For such more question on plaintiff:
brainly.com/question/15649498
#SPJ4
In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions commits the offense of aggravated
perjury.
O True
O False
The statement that "In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions commits the offense of aggravated perjury," is False.
What happens when a witness does not answer a question in Texan courts?In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions can be held in contempt of court for refusing to testify or failing to answer a question. This is not the same as aggravated perjury, which involves giving false testimony under oath with the intent to deceive or mislead.
Aggravated perjury is a serious offense in Texas and can result in significant criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines.
Find out more on perjury at https://brainly.com/question/30312181
#SPJ1
What are your thoughts on this interview? Does Richard Clarke have a point when discussing breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments? If you had to make the decision to split the Department of Homeland Security or keep it the same, which would you choose?
1. Richard Clarke does not have a point when he discussed breaking the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments because what this achieves is increased departmentalization.
2. I would not split the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments. Rather, I would split the department into operational units to manage the various threats that the United States faces while keeping the department as one.
What are the goals of the Department of Homeland Security?The Department of Homeland Security, created after the 9/11 attacks, to strengthen the security architecture of the nation at home, has the responsibility to pursue the following security goals:
Prevent terrorismEnhance securitySecure and manage U.S. bordersEnforce and administer U.S. immigration laws.Under these broad goals, the Department of Homeland Security oversees the national security of the United States from numerous threats.
Some of the direct responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security include:
Border securityAviation securityCountering terrorismEmergency responseChemical facility inspectionIT and cybersecurity securityNatural disaster planning and response.Thus, instead of discussing splitting the Department of Homeland Security into multiple departments, Richard Clarke should look at ways to strengthen and empower the department to achieve its goals.
Learn more about the Department of Homeland Security at https://brainly.com/question/19521614
#SPJ1
The Health Planners’ Evaluation of the Physicians Supply survey found that there was a surplus of practicing physicians in the U. S. In the 1960’s. True or False
Question 2
According to the principal-agent problem;
A) Patients chose to be rationally ignorant
B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor
C) Both 1 and 2
D) Health maintenance organizations do not insure people for their pre-existing conditions
Question 3
The strongest predictor in the variation in health care demand among countries is;
A) GDP per capita
B) Population size
C) Medical Insurance System
D) Availability of physicians
1. True. 2. B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor. 3. The strongest predictor in the variation in health care demand among countries is C) Medical Insurance System.
1. In the 1960s, there was indeed a surplus of practicing physicians in the United States. The Health Planners’ Evaluation of the Physicians Supply survey conducted during that time period found evidence of an oversupply of physicians relative to the demand for their services. This surplus was attributed to various factors, including the rapid growth of medical schools, changes in healthcare financing, and increased government support for medical education. As a result, the number of physicians entering the workforce exceeded the demand, leading to a surplus.
2. The principal-agent problem refers to a situation in which an agent (in this case, the doctor) is entrusted by a principal (the patient) to make decisions on their behalf. The correct statement regarding the principal-agent problem is B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor. In this context, patients often rely on doctors' expertise and knowledge to make informed decisions about their healthcare. However, this delegation of decision-making can sometimes lead to issues of information asymmetry, where the doctor may prioritize their own interests or have different goals than the patient. The principal-agent problem recognizes this potential conflict of interest and the need for mechanisms to align the doctor's actions with the patient's best interests.
3. Among the given options, the strongest predictor of the variation in healthcare demand among countries is C) Medical Insurance System. The type and structure of a country's healthcare insurance system can significantly influence healthcare demand. Countries with comprehensive and accessible healthcare insurance systems tend to have higher demand for healthcare services due to increased affordability and availability of care. On the other hand, countries with limited or fragmented insurance systems may experience lower demand for healthcare services. While factors such as GDP per capita, population size, and availability of physicians can also contribute to healthcare demand variation, the medical insurance system has been found to be a key determinant.
It is important to note that these answers are based on general knowledge and may not encompass all possible perspectives or nuances related to the topics.
To learn more about delegates click here: brainly.com/question/30112239
#SPJ11
In which of these states is it illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop, NEW YORK, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, PENNSYLVANIA?
Answer:
Illinois is the state where it is illegal to do this.
Among the given options, it is not explicitly illegal to fall asleep in a cheese shop in any of the states: New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, or Pennsylvania.
It's important to note that specific laws and regulations can vary within each state, and there might be local ordinances or specific circumstances where falling asleep in a cheese shop could potentially be considered a violation.
However, as a general statement, there are no known laws in these states that explicitly prohibit falling asleep in a cheese shop. It's always advisable to be respectful of the rules and policies of any establishment and to inquire about any specific guidelines regarding sleeping or resting on the premises.
Learn more about cheese shop here:
https://brainly.com/question/22734191
#SPJ2
Glen is a dairy farmer who owns 500 milk cows. His fences are in poor repair, and his cows are often found eating the grass on Hank's land. Hank believes that Glen is responsible for damages to Hank's land on a theory of strict liability. The court will most likely find that Glen is:
Answer:
I would say that Glen is responsible for all of the damages that are caused to Hank's land because the cows belong Glen and it is Glen's responsibility to fix things that are broken on his land so that way the animals don't escape. There fore I would say that Glen is responsible for the damages because he failed to keep his cows under control.
Explanation:
Statistics show that drivers who text while driving spend what percentage of time driving in the wrong lane
Answer:
Drivers spend 10% of their time outside their lane while texting
Explanation:
Texting makes a crash up to 23 times more likely. Teens who text while driving spend 10% of the time outside their lane. According to AT&T's Teen Driver Survey, 97% of teens agree that texting while driving is dangerous, yet 43% do it anyway.
The war on terror primarily involves wars in witch two nations in the Middle East?
Answer:
Iran and Afghanistan
Explanation:
Which of the following was a former name for the FBI?
The Division of Investigation
The United States Bureau of Investigation
the US Secret Service
The National Bureau of Criminal Identification
Answer:
B The United States Bureau of Investigation
Explanation:
Answer:
all of them
A. the US Secret Service
B. The United States Bureau of Investigation
C. The National Bureau of Criminal Identification
D. The Division of Investigation
Explanation:
Under which circumstances would you consider filing an amicus brief in an appeals case?
Answer:
An amicus curiae brief in support of a petitioner or appellant shall be filed within 30 days after the case is placed on the docket or a response is called for by the Court, whichever is later, and that time will not be extended.
Which of the following is the system designed to protect the right of a government to control its citizens’ behaviors through written law? A. Criminal law B. Specific criminal law C. General criminal law D. Common law
Answer:
criminal law
i am confused
Answer: the government use civil service examinations based on the teachings of Confucianism or just C
Explanation: I also use brainly.com I was just searching it up and I saw nobody was doing the answer so here you go
Locke’s purpose in examining the “state of Nature”is
A) To show how primitive human beings lived before they formed societies.
B)To determine the natural rights of human being and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power.
C)To show that all governments represents at least marginal improvements to the state of nature.
D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.
E)To show the rights to property obtains in the state of nature but not in civil society.
Answer:
b) to determine the natural rights of human beings and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power.
The purpose in examining the “state of Nature” is To determine the natural rights of a human being and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power. Thus, option (B) is correct.
What is natural rights?Natural law claims that persons have certain rights. For instance, Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are listed as natural rights in the United States Declaration of Independence.
The right to property, the freedom to criticize the government, and the right to free, and independent thought are all examples of natural rights.
These are universal and inalienable since they are not founded on the laws, customs, or beliefs of any one community or government.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the goal of studying the "state of Nature" is to evaluate a human being's inherent rights and, as a result, the rightful degree of political authority. Hence, option (B) is correct.
Learn more about natural rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/20887193
#SPJ2
The Whig party was previously known as which party? Democratic-Republicans.
The Whig party was previously known as the Democratic-Republicans.
In 1834 by opponents of President Andrew Jackson and his Jacksonian Democrats, the Whig Party was formed. The name “Whigs” was derived from the English antimonarchist party and was an attempt to portray Jackson as "King Andrew".
As a coalition of National Republicans, Anti-Masons, and disgruntled Democrats, who were united by their opposition to Jackson and his policies the Whig Party was formed. The Whig Party was active in the period 1834–54 and espoused a program of national development but was founded on the rising tide of sectional antagonism.
To learn more about Whig Party:
https://brainly.com/question/26326295
#SPJ4