which of the following terms best replace the question mark in the excerpt above?
A) oligarchy
B) theocracy
C) Republic
D) monarchy

Answer:

Probably to find treasures, and to conquer more land.

Explanation:

Subscribe to Zlates on you tube

Based on the poem, do not go gentle into that good night, it is TRUE that the message is that people should fight to live.

“Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night” is a poem by Dylan Thomas where he encourages the reader not to give up on fighting to live. The poem talks about several types of people and what they should do when faced with death.

In all of the situations described, the message was that people should "not go gentle into that goodnight" which meant that they should not allow death to take them calmly. They must fight death with everything they can. They should fight to live and to be able to avoid the light dying in their eyes.

Options for this question include:

Find out more on “Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night” at https://brainly.com/question/28086660

#SPJ1

Yes, I drew original inferences based on the information I was presented.

Information is the knowledge and understanding gained through study or experience. It is data that has been collected, organized, and presented in an understandable format. Information is used to make decisions, solve problems, and increase understanding. It is also used to educate, entertain, and influence people's actions and decisions.

This activity helped me better understand the history of the Cold War by illustrating the impact it had on US domestic policies, as well as the ways in which the US attempted to counter the spread of communism and the Soviet Union's influence. I was especially challenged by the complexity of the foreign policy decisions and the multiple levels at which they were made. I also gained a new appreciation for the amount of work and resources that went into creating and maintaining the Cold War.

To learn more about information
https://brainly.com/question/267656
#SPJ1

Joan of Arc, a young Frenchwoman, played a significant role in the Hundred Years' War by turning the tide of English victories in France.

She achieved this by liberating the city of Orléans and persuading Charles VII of France to assert his claim to the throne. Joan claimed to be divinely inspired, which motivated and inspired the French troops. Her successful military campaign at Orléans boosted French morale and shifted the momentum of the war. By securing Charles VII's position as the rightful king, Joan played a crucial role in the ultimate victory of the French against the English. In summary, Joan's actions and influence were instrumental in reversing the fortunes of the French and in the outcome of the war.

To know more about war visit:

brainly.com/question/10024951

#SPJ11

Southern advantages

 outstanding military officers – most had experience from the Mexican War, they had a

strong military tradition and had been educated at military schools

 strong motivation – were fighting to keep way of life

 fighting on home ground – knew the territory

 soldiers skilled with guns and horses because they lived in rural areas

Southern disadvantages

 weak leadership skills of Jefferson Davis

 no navy

 fewer men and supplies

 few factories

 less money

 weaker government

I believe that you can form a paragraph from this information

  All of the statements about Sojourner Truth are true, except for the fact that she killed her master to escape from slavery.

  Sojourner Truth was indeed born into slavery, and she became a prominent advocate for women's rights and abolition. She changed her name from Isabella after a mystical experience where she believed she had a conversation with God. She was born in New York in the late 1790s and faced numerous hardships as a slave before eventually escaping to freedom.

  However, it is important to note that there is no historical record or evidence to support the claim that Sojourner Truth killed her master to escape slavery. Her path to freedom involved legal means and support from abolitionist networks. Sojourner Truth's incredible life and activism left a lasting impact on the fight for equality and justice, particularly for African Americans and women.

Learn more about slavery here: brainly.com/question/866336

#SPJ11

The  constitutional action starts the process by which a president is removed from office proportional representation .

Relating to, inherent in, or affecting the charter of frame or mind. Of, regarding, or moving into the fundamental make-up of some thing crucial.  being in accordance with or authorized via the charter of a nation or society a constitutional government.

Constitutional rights are the protections and liberties assured to the humans by the U. S. constitution. lots of these rights are outlined within the bill of Rights, together with the proper to unfastened speech and the proper to a rapid and public trial.

Constitutional rights are breached at some point of the criminal justice method, and the breach contributes to a guilty conviction, you could pursue an attraction based on an mistakes inside the criminal technique or jury misconduct, or document a movement for a new trial.

Learn more about constitutional  here:https://brainly.com/question/453546

#SPJ4

Answer:

impeachment

Explanation:

The ideas about immigration expressed in the excerpt refer to the immigration rates during the 1990s, which dropped to their lowest point in the twentieth century.

The correct option is C.

During this decade, immigrants from Europe once again became the largest group, following drops in immigration rates from other regions. Immigration debates in this period increasingly became politicized, as global events had largely unaffected immigration.

As a result, policymakers had to reconcile different sides on the debate through immigration reform. So the context in which the ideas about immigration are situated are the distinctly politicized debates about immigration in the 1990s.

To know more about immigration, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29998020

#SPJ4

Explanation:

It is difficult to provide an accurate answer to this question, as reliable data on the number of slaves held by plantations is limited. However, an analysis of the 1860 U.S. Census shows that approximately 4.5% of slaveholders owned fifty or more slaves, suggesting that a similar percentage of slaves lived on plantations with holdings of fifty or more slaves.

The Glorious Revolution, also called “The Revolution of 1688” and “The Bloodless Revolution,” took place from 1688 to 1689 in England.

It entailed the toppling of the Catholic King James II, who was succeeded by Mary, his Protestant daughter, and William of Orange, a Dutchman.

The revolution's causes were multifaceted and comprised both political and theological considerations.

The event is a watershed moment in the English history as it bought a complete realignment of the political geography within the country.

The incident ultimately altered England's system of government by giving Parliament more control over the crown and sowing the seeds of a democratic democracy.

To know more about Glorious Revolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/4972121

#SPJ1

The Apartheid laws violate the human rights of people in South Africa by  assault and torture in police custody, detention without charge or trial, and restriction orders.

The Apartheid laws affected the people of South Africa where the pass laws and Apartheid policies prohibited the Black people there from entering urban areas without immediately finding a job. However, it was illegal for a Black person not to carry a passbook.

Black people could not even marry white people. Also, in South Africa they could not even set up businesses in white areas. So, this way the  Apartheid laws violate the human rights of people in South Africa.

Hence, Apartheid was a system of segregation and discrimination.

To learn more about the Apartheid laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/3860599

#SPJ1

Answer:

 Myths are stories created to teach people about something important and meaningful

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

What is the difference between a civil right and a human right? Simply put, human rights are rights one acquires by being alive. Civil rights are rights that one obtains by being a legal member of a certain political state.

Answer:

Explanation:

The artist in question is John White, a 16th century Englishman known for his drawings and watercolors of the New World

In 1587, he was appointed governor of the second Roanoke colony, a settlement on the coast of present-day North Carolina.John White appointment was in part due to his close relationship with Sir Walter Raleigh, who sponsored the colony. White was a man of peace, and he believed that the key to success in the New World was to coexist peacefully with the Native Americans. He had witnessed the violence and bloodshed of previous expeditions, and he was determined to avoid a similar fate for his colony. To this end, White established friendly relations with the local Algonquian tribe and attempted to learn their language and customs. He also sought to trade with the natives, exchanging European goods for food and other supplies. In fact, White's artistic skills proved to be a valuable asset in these negotiations, as he was able to use his drawings to communicate with the Algonquians.

learn more about  John White here:

https://brainly.com/question/9483092

#SPJ4

Answer: For the first question the answer is D.

Explanation: For the second question the answer is F. Ahimsa is the ancient Indian principle of nonviolence which applies to all living beings. It is a key virtue in Indian religions: Jainism, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Sikhism. Ahimsa is one of the cardinal virtues of Jainism, where it is the first of the Pancha Mahavrata.

The purpose of the demonstration at Tiananmen Square in 1989 was multifaceted with protesters voicing various grievances and demands

The demonstration initially began as a student-led movement calling for political reform freedom of speech freedom of the press and greater government accountability in China The protesters sought to address issues such as corruption lack of political participation and perceived social inequality

The demonstration at Tiananmen Square attracted a diverse range of participants including students intellectuals workers and citizens from different backgrounds

Read mroe on  Tiananmen Square  here https://brainly.com/question/720320

#SPJ1

No. The Ancient Roman economy was actually based on the private land ownership and the slavery. It was nothing like any form of the socialism.

The economy of the Ancient  Roman Empire was to be predominantly agrarian: the Roman landowners, the agricultural laborers, and also the small tenant the farmers were they highly dependent upon one of the another for assuring stability. Agriculture was the basis of there economy. There were mostly little of the farmers but also the wealthy landowners that was employed so many peasants and the slaves to work on their huge lands. The main crops were, that logically, the Mediterranean triad of the wheat, grapes and the olives.

To know more about Ancient  Roman visit:

https://brainly.com/question/765845

#SPJ1

An argument between states that participated and those that did not at the constitutional convention was resolved by the three-fifths compromise. So, D is the best choice for us.

Three-fifths of the slave population would be taken into account for calculating direct taxes and House of Representatives representation, Northern and Southern state delegates from the United States Constitutional Convention (1787) agreed as a compromise.

Many of the Founding Fathers recognized that slavery went against the ideal of liberty that was at the heart of the American Revolution, but they were unable to act decisively to end it because they were dedicated to the sanctity of private property rights, the ideas of limited government, and the pursuit of intersectional harmony.

How to calculate population was a very complicated issue. After failing to achieve the abolition of slavery, several delegates from the Northern states attempted to tie representation to the proportion of free people in each state.

Conversely, Southern delegates threatened to withdraw from the conference if enslaved people were not included. The framers ultimately came to an agreement on a compromise that stipulated that representation in the House of Representatives would be allocated based on a state's population of free people plus three-fifths of its number of slaves.

The term "three-fifths" was used to refer to this arrangement.

To know more about the "Three-fifth compromise" go to https://brainly.com/question/19864111

#SPJ4

Answer:

Treaty of Tordesillas

Explanation: hope this helps.

While women in ancient Rome did not have the same rights and opportunities as men, there were still ways in which they could assert their own agency and exercise power in their own spheres of influence.

While marriage in ancient Rome was indeed a patriarchal institution, there were ways in which some Roman women exercised their own freedom and power. For instance, wealthy women could own and manage their own property and businesses, which provided them with a degree of financial independence. Additionally, some women were able to gain political influence through their husbands or family connections, allowing them to have a say in important decisions. Women also played important roles in religion, with some serving as priestesses or participating in important religious ceremonies.

Learn more about Rome here: -

https://brainly.com/question/30497295

#SPJ11

Answer:

I’m pretty sure it’s groups paid by slave owners to capture runaway slaves.

Explanation:

They were armed men who punished and monitored slaves.

Answer:

The answer is "c" groups paid by slave owners to capture runaway slaves. it was much easier to catch slaves this way because they would use other slaves as spies to get intell on the underground railroad.

Explanation:

Answer:

It stretched from the Baltic Sea in the north to the Black Sea in the south, involved most of Eastern Europe, and stretched deep into Central Europe as well. The term contrasts with "Western Front", which was being fought in Belgium and France.

Explanation:

One of the most significant figures in Spanish history is undoubtedly King Phillip of Spain. His luck in acquiring land without going to war during his kingship came from being born into a family with origins all over Europe.

The Vaucelles Truce was ratified by King Phillip and France in the same year. The Hapsburg-Valios war was put an end by this truce. King Phillip thereby ended a conflict and extended Spain within the first year of his administration. Following this, the French were destroyed at the Battle of St. Quentin by a Spanish and English team.

Before the Queen of England rejected him, King Phillip was enjoying a successful reign. Fortunately, he married Elizabeth of France and signed a treaty with them the following year. Phillip II dispatched the military in 1567 to put an end to the Protestant insurrection in the Netherlands.

Learn more about acquiring land here

https://brainly.com/question/7602509

#SPJ4

Answer:

The rooms were super small. They would separate the rooms into smaller rooms and fit many families into the tiny spaces.

Explanation:

Answer:

Many people had to share space with other families

Explanation:

APEX

The two main strategies used by the Allies contributed to the success of DDay are:

The first strategy was the element of surprise. The Allies made great efforts to conceal their true intentions and mislead the Germans about the location and timing of the invasion. They created a complex web of deception tactics, such as using fake radio transmissions and inflatable tanks, which convinced the Germans that the main invasion would take place at a different location.

The second strategy was the coordinated effort of the different branches of the military. The invasion involved a massive and complex operation that required the coordinated efforts of soldiers, sailors, and airmen from multiple countries.

Read more about D-Day

brainly.com/question/16529260

#SPJ1

Answer: Handcrafted yarn will be scarcer because it takes more time and labor to produce it.

Explanation: Scarcity in economics is a term describing finite resources, or the perception of limited resources, when there’s not enough to fulfill human needs and wants. Scarcity affects the monetary value people place on goods and services and how governments and private firms decide to distribute resources. Things that are scarce, like gold, diamonds, or certain kinds of knowledge, are more valuable for being scarce because sellers of these goods and services can set higher prices.

Handcrafted yarn will be scarcer than mass-produced yarn because it takes more time and labor to produce it. Time and labor are limited resources that have alternative uses. For example, a craftsperson could use their time and labor to make something else instead of yarn. Therefore, handcrafted yarn has a higher opportunity cost than mass-produced yarn. Opportunity cost reflects the inputs’ scarcity.

Mass-produced yarn will be less scarce than handcrafted yarn because it does not take as much time and labor to produce it. Machines can produce yarn faster and more efficiently than humans. Therefore, mass-produced yarn has a lower opportunity cost than handcrafted yarn.

The company should consider how scarcity affects the supply and demand of yarn before making a decision. Supply is the amount of a good or service that sellers are willing and able to offer at a given price. Demand is the amount of a good or service that buyers are willing and able to purchase at a given price. The price of a good or service is determined by the interaction of supply and demand in a market.

If the company chooses to make wool sweaters from handcrafted yarn, it will face a lower supply and a higher price of yarn. This means that the company will have to pay more for the raw material and may not be able to produce as many sweaters as it wants. The company will also have to charge a higher price for its sweaters to cover its costs and make a profit. This may reduce the demand for its sweaters, as some buyers may not be willing or able to pay the higher price.

If the company chooses to make wool sweaters from mass-produced yarn, it will face a higher supply and a lower price of yarn. This means that the company will have to pay less for the raw material and may be able to produce more sweaters than it wants. The company will also be able to charge a lower price for its sweaters and still make a profit. This may increase the demand for its sweaters, as more buyers may be willing and able to pay the lower price.

The company should weigh the pros and cons of each option and decide which one maximizes its utility, or satisfaction, given its budget constraints and preferences.

Hope this helps, and have a great day! =)

Answer:

hey !!

1. Availability of resources: The scarcity of raw materials required for yarn production, such as wool, needs to be considered. If the supply of high-quality wool is limited, using it for individual craftspeople's yarn may result in a higher opportunity cost for the company.

Cost of production: Scarcity can affect the cost of production. Mass-produced yarn may be more cost-effective due to economies of scale and the availability of machinery, whereas yarn produced by individual craftspeople might require higher labour costs and specialized skills.

Time and efficiency: Consider the time required to produce yarn using either method. If the demand for wool sweaters is high, mass-produced yarn could be more efficient in meeting customer demands within shorter timeframes. Individual craftspeople may have limited capacity and slower production rates.

Uniqueness and craftsmanship: Scarcity can also create value in terms of uniqueness and craftsmanship. Yarn spun and dyed by individual craftspeople might result in higher-quality and more distinctive products, appealing to customers seeking handcrafted, artisanal items. This uniqueness can be a competitive advantage.

Consumer preferences: The company should consider customer preferences and market trends. Some customers may be willing to pay a premium for products made with artisanal yarn, while others may prioritize the affordability and availability offered by mass-produced yarn.

To clarify, scarcity refers to the limited availability of a resource relative to its demand. In the context of yarn production, scarcity can be understood differently based on the factors involved:

Availability and production capacity: Handcrafted yarn may be considered scarcer if there are limited craftspeople available or if the production capacity is low. It requires skilled individuals to spin and dye the yarn, and if there is a shortage of such artisans, the availability of handcrafted yarn may be limited.

Scalability and production efficiency: Mass-produced yarn, on the other hand, benefits from economies of scale and production efficiency. With machinery and automated processes, mass production can meet higher demands more quickly and consistently. In this sense, mass-produced yarn is less scarce in terms of availability and production capacity.

It's important to note that scarcity can be evaluated from different perspectives. If we focus on the scarcity of labour and time, handcrafted yarn may indeed be scarcer due to the manual labour and time-intensive nature of the process. However, if we consider availability and scalability, mass-produced yarn may be less scarce due to its ability to meet larger market demands.

hope this helps :)