Which sentence is in the first person point of view?
The wolf talked to Little Red Riding Hood
The wolf went to Grandma's house.
The hunter helped Little Red Riding Hood.
We shouldn't trust the wolf.

Answer:

Sabnam didn't meet Sudha yesterday.

Explanation:

A negative sentence tells you that something is not so. Positive sentences can be formed into negative sentences by adding the words not, doesn't, didn't, wasn't, can't couldn't, shouldn't, etc.

Sabnam met Sudha yesterday is a positive sentence, so it must be changed into a negative sentence.

We can do this by adding one of the words mentioned above.

Sabnam didn't meet Sudha yesterday is a negative sentence and your answer.

Have a great rest of your day! :)

Answer:

B im 100% sure :333

<33333

Answer:

i think anger and frustration

Explanation:

Answer:

a

Explanation:

it says that when he pulled the tides it saved the paddling.

Answer:

I'd say the last option since he is money hungry

In my opinion, yeah, it's very good lol

The sentence "here is a sunken boat" is an example of a clause.

The sentence "Here is a sunken boat" is an independent clause, as it contains a subject ("here") and a verb ("is") and forms a complete thought. It can stand alone as a sentence. An independent clause is a clause that can function as a sentence by itself, while a dependent clause cannot.

In other words, the sentence "Here is a sunken boat" can be considered a clause because it has a subject and a verb and forms a complete thought.

Learn more about clauses here;

https://brainly.com/question/19711531

#SPJ1

Answer:

B.) To travel all the way around something.

Explanation:

Circum means around, surrounding, or encircling.

Navigate means sail or travel over.

Hope this helps!

Have a nice dayy! :)

Answer:

1. are, is

2. is

3. were

Please mark me as brainliest..!

Answer:

Explanation:

In the book Night by Elie Wiesel's opening few chapters, Moishe the Beadle plays a key role. Eliezer, the narrator and protagonist, shares the same town as Moishe, a poor and illiterate Jew. Since he is from a nearby town, Moishe is also a foreigner.

The Jews of Sighet initially pay little attention to Moishe the Beadle. They view him as an oddball who spends a lot of time alone in his thoughts and consider him to be an outsider. Eliezer, on the other hand, is captivated to him and ends up becoming his disciple. They spend a lot of time together talking about spirituality and religion.

Later in the narrative, Moishe the Beadle plays a pivotal role since he is the sole Jew to survive a mass deportation of Jews to extermination camps. They do not believe him when he returns to Sighet and warns the Jews about the horrors he has witnessed. The Sighet Jews do not take Moishe's warnings seriously because they believe he is crazy or exaggerated.

The sorrow and disaster that the Jewish people would eventually experience are symbolized by Moishe the Beadle. He is the first to attempt to warn the Jews of Sighet about the impending danger, but his advice is ignored. The persona of Moishe exemplifies how the Jews of Sighet, and consequently, the Jewish people,were originally smug and unable to see the danger looming. The character of Moishe in the narrative highlights the idea of denial and the Jews' inability to realize the horrors that awaited them.

Brown Cat I adore Midnight, my black cat. She is very adorable and cosy. She loves to nap on my lap and has an incredibly loud purr. She enjoys being petted, and I enjoy petting her.

She enjoys being rubbed and has really silky fur. Midnight has a great disposition. She enjoys chasing her toys around the house and is quite energetic. She enjoys lying in the sun and watching the birds outdoors as well.

She has a strong sense of curiosity and enjoys travelling. Midnight makes a fantastic friend. She is constantly available for me. She is really sweet and devoted. She always recognises when I need a hug and is a fantastic listener. I am extremely blessed.

Learn more about  capitalization at:

https://brainly.com/question/32408251

#SPJ1

Explanation:

today when I was going to the market I saw a masked person ( wearing a anonymous mask) going silently towards mall.

some crazy peoples were following him asking him to take off the mask ( he was new in the city so they are trolling him) but he was ignoring them.

after some time someone from crowd take out his mask forcefully at this the man hit a single blow and the guy fell far away.( the guy was a martial artist)

everyone was surprised he was so good looking but he put his mask again and acted nothing happened.

that's was funny how he was ignoring girls trying to talk .

I was the friend of his

Critical thinking in school includes evaluating situations and texts to determine an opinion on a subject, looking for deeper meanings or significance in texts, identifying assumptions the material is making, the evidence it is using as support, the quality of the argument, and conclusions based upon the material. In short, all of the choices mentioned are correct.

To explain further, critical thinking involves actively analyzing and evaluating information to form a well-reasoned opinion. Let's break down the different components of critical thinking:

1. Evaluating situations and texts: This means carefully examining a situation or text to gather information and evidence. For example, when reading a news article, you would assess its credibility, sources, and biases to form an informed opinion.

2. Determining an opinion: Critical thinking requires forming an opinion based on the evaluation of different perspectives and evidence. It involves considering multiple viewpoints and drawing conclusions supported by logical reasoning.

3. Looking for deeper meanings or significance: Critical thinkers go beyond the surface level and seek to understand the underlying meanings and implications of the information they encounter. They consider context, subtext, and underlying assumptions to gain a more comprehensive understanding.

4. Identifying assumptions, evidence, and quality of argument: Critical thinkers analyze the assumptions made in a text, the evidence provided to support those assumptions, and the quality of the argument. They question the reliability and validity of the evidence and assess the logical consistency and coherence of the argument presented.

5. Drawing conclusions: Critical thinkers synthesize the information they have evaluated and draw conclusions based on the evidence and reasoning. They avoid jumping to hasty conclusions and instead rely on logical deductions and inferences.

By engaging in these processes, students can develop critical thinking skills that are essential for academic success and everyday life. Critical thinking helps individuals become better problem solvers, decision-makers, and independent learners.

Overall, critical thinking involves actively engaging with information, analyzing it from various perspectives, and using logical reasoning to form well-informed opinions. It is a crucial skill that enables students to navigate complex situations, evaluate information critically, and make informed choices.

To know more about Critical thinking refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/33441964#

#SPJ11

The Legend of Sleepy Hollow, 1820 was inspired by "A real Hessian soldier decapitated by a cannonball at the Battle of White Plains around Halloween in 1776."

Irving wrote a legend while living in England. Some scholars suggest that Irving's story may have been inspired by the folk tales he heard abroad. German, English and Scandinavian folk tales of headless knights chasing unhappy travelers have been told for generations.

The lesson of The Legend of Sleepy Hollow is to keep superstitions from shaking you and overwhelming your reason.

The moral of the story is a small town, and the romantic competition between local bullies and school teachers culminates in horrifying night rides. In a small town called Sleepy Hollow, a skinny school teacher named Ichabod Crane comes to town.

Learn more about The Legend of Sleepy Hollow here:https://brainly.com/question/1374947

#SPJ1

Answer: Barney Northrup was old in the movie, but young in book.  Westing's Company was called “Westing Paper Products” in the book, but “Westing International” in the movie. Turtle never looked at stocks in the movie, but in the book she was very interested in the stocks.

Explanation:

Can you pls put brainliest:)

Art may be designed and offered in lots of uncommon ways, along with artwork that makes music.

Art this is appealing may be used to make humans privy to a sad hassle withinside the world. The imperative concept withinside the Newsela article "Washed-Up Plastics Become Art with a Vital Message is that there has been an Increased recognition of the risks of ocean pollutants are growing hobby in Pozzi's artwork. The element from the textual content great conveys the solution is that "She now has extra than 70 portions in 3 exhibitions presently visiting at some stage in the United States. She additionally has requests from overseas." In any article, the said major concept is frequently referred to as the thesis statement. But while the writer does now no longer country the principle concept in a uncomplicated terms, then it may be known as implied major concept.

To learn more about Newsela article check the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/22186472

#SPJ4

Answer:

1. The conclusion that can be drawn from this passage is that Gilgamesh is encouraging his brother to be courageous and face their current situation without succumbing to fear.

2. The evidence that best supports this conclusion is found in the following statements:

- "Courage, dear brother, this is no time to give in to fear."

- "You were raised in the wild, with your own hands you have killed marauding lions and wolves."

- "You are brave, your heart has been tested in combat."

- "Though your arms feel weak now and your legs tremble, you are a warrior, you know what to do."

These statements highlight Gilgamesh's understanding of his brother's bravery and past experiences. He acknowledges his brother's courage and reminds him of his ability to overcome challenges. By emphasizing his brother's background and accomplishments, Gilgamesh aims to motivate and reassure him in the face of their current situation.

Gilgamesh is shown as a motivational and courageous character in this passage, with evidence coming from his direct dialogue encouraging his brother to remain brave in the face of adversity.

From this passage, we can conclude that Gilgamesh is a very courageous and motivational figure. He emphasizes the importance of courage in the face of adversity, reminding his brother of their journey and all the obstacles they have overcome. His words reveal a strong, encouraging personality. The evidence supporting this conclusion comes from the direct dialogue of Gilgamesh in the passage- he directly urges his brother to be brave, harking back to his brother's feats as a warrior. The courage he exuding and the underlying motivation in his words portray him as a motivational figure.

https://brainly.com/question/34181903

#SPJ2

The article provides a summary of its main idea, supported by evidence, and employs an argumentative strategy to establish the point. The author's reasoning is of good quality, receiving a rating of 8 out of 10 for the support provided. The article effectively builds upon the ideas expressed by the relevant philosopher, demonstrating a strong connection. Two significant questions that arise from the reading are: 1) How can the author's argument be applied to other philosophical concepts? 2) What are the potential implications of this argument on society and ethics?

The article summarizes its main idea by emphasizing the importance of understanding the argumentative strategy employed by the author and the quality of reasoning present. It highlights the relationship between the article and the ideas expressed by the relevant philosopher, focusing on the effectiveness of building upon those ideas

Supporting evidence is provided throughout the article to reinforce the main point. The author references specific examples and quotes from the original text, showcasing the relevance and applicability of the philosopher's ideas. Additionally, the author presents logical reasoning and analysis to further solidify the main point.

The argumentative strategy employed by the author can be characterized as persuasive. The author uses a combination of logical reasoning, evidence, and examples to convince the reader of the validity of the main point. The method of establishing the main point involves presenting a clear thesis statement, supporting it with evidence and analysis, and concluding with a strong summary that reinforces the argument.

The quality of reasoning in the article is generally strong, scoring an 8 out of 10. The author provides a clear and logical progression of ideas, effectively using evidence and examples to support the main point. However, there may be a few instances where certain aspects could be further elaborated or addressed to enhance the overall quality of reasoning.

The article effectively builds upon the ideas expressed by the relevant philosopher. The author carefully examines the philosopher's concepts and integrates them into the argument, demonstrating a deep understanding of the original ideas. The author expands on these ideas by providing additional analysis and connecting them to real-world scenarios, thereby effectively building upon the philosopher's foundation.

Two significant questions that arise from the reading are: 1) How can the author's argument be applied to other philosophical concepts? This question is significant as it explores the broader implications and potential connections of the main point with other philosophical ideas. Answering this question would involve examining different philosophical frameworks and evaluating the compatibility of the author's argument with them.

2) What are the potential implications of this argument on society and ethics? This question is significant as it delves into the practical consequences of the main point. Answering this question would involve analyzing the societal and ethical implications of adopting the author's perspective, considering potential benefits and drawbacks, and exploring its alignment with existing ethical theories.

To answer these questions, further research can be conducted by exploring related scholarly articles, engaging in philosophical discussions, and critically examining various perspectives on the topic.

For more such questions on society, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/24116605

#SPJ8

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The correct answer to what Justin and Leah are doing when they advocate for their high school cafeteria to serve healthier food is;

An advocate is a proponent for a particular cause of action. An advocate does not achieve his purpose through violence.

He rather uses civil means to help people to see reasons why his own cause of action should be the best.

Advocates can plead their cause through writing or oral speech. For example, some lawyers are advocates for child welfare.

So, when the sentence says that Justin and Leah are advocates, it means that they present reasons why there should be a dietary improvement in the cafeteria.

Learn more here:

https://brainly.com/question/14368207

Referential ambiguity and grammatical ambiguity are two types of ambiguities that can occur in language.

Referential ambiguity refers to a situation in which a word or phrase can refer to more than one object or concept. For example, in the sentence "The farmer killed the pig," the word "pig" could refer to either an animal or a type of food. This type of ambiguity can be resolved by looking at the context in which the word is used, or by asking additional questions to clarify the meaning.

Grammatical ambiguity, on the other hand, refers to a situation in which a sentence or phrase is grammatically correct but can be interpreted in more than one way. For example, the sentence "She bought a pair of shoes" could be interpreted in two ways: either she bought two pairs of shoes or she bought a single pair of shoes and plans to buy another pair later.

This type of ambiguity can be resolved by looking at the context in which the sentence is used or by considering the speaker's intended meaning.

Overall, both referential and grammatical ambiguity can make communication more difficult and can lead to misunderstandings. It is important to use clear and unambiguous language to avoid these types of ambiguities and ensure that communication is as effective as possible.

To learn more about ambiguities, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10631637

#SPJ11

Because that is what his whole speech was about... it was about freedom from racism u should giver her brainllest

Answer:
A complex sentence.

Answer:

Explanation: tense

peace

dirty deeds

panoramic

flow dynamics

Answer:

The sentence that best accomplishes the goal of elaborating on Linnaeus’ neighbors’ perceptions to show how unique he was is: D. They did not know what to make of him; neither did his own father and mother. This sentence provides additional information about how Linnaeus was perceived by those around him and emphasizes his uniqueness.

Explanation:

The details about sugar's dependency on slavery because sugar set people in motion all across the world help inform readers about why sugar was millions of them as slaves, in chains; a few in search inexpensive.

In this text, the author explains that sugar was a cheap commodity during this time period.

This was the case despite the fact that sugar was produced thousands of miles away. The main idea of this excerpt is that sugar was such an inexpensive good because it relied on slavery.

By using free labour, production costs were kept extremely low, allowing for sugar to be inexpensive, and therefore, popular all over the world.

Thus, option "B" is correct.

To learn more about Sugar Changed the World click here:

https://brainly.com/question/26279167

#SPJ1

Held believes that the historical philosophy of reason and emotion has been incorrect because it neglects the importance of emotions and focuses mainly on reason. The feminist theorists she describes suggest remediating this problem by emphasizing the significance of emotions and promoting a more holistic approach to understanding human cognition and behavior.

According to Held, what has been wrong with the history of philosophy regarding reason and emotions is that it has been dominated by men who tend to suppress emotions and emphasize reason. Held argues that this has resulted in a distorted view of human nature that ignores the importance of emotions in shaping human behavior and decision-making.

Feminist theorists suggest remedying this problem by developing a new approach to philosophy that acknowledges the importance of emotions in shaping human behavior and decision-making. They argue that emotions should be recognized as a legitimate source of knowledge and that reason and emotion should be seen as complementary rather than oppositional.

This approach, they argue, will help to provide a more accurate and complete understanding of human nature and will help to promote a more just and equitable society.
 

You can learn more about the history of philosophy at: brainly.com/question/18559260

#SPJ11

The best explanation for the change in the size of Grinnell Glacier between 1910 and 1997, based on the photographs, would be a. Higher average temperatures. Therefore option A is correct.

Rising temperatures due to climate change have a significant impact on glaciers worldwide. As temperatures increase, glaciers melt at a faster rate than they can accumulate new snow and ice.

This leads to a reduction in the size and volume of glaciers over time, as seen in the photographs of Grinnell Glacier. The melting of glaciers is a direct consequence of the higher average temperatures caused by climate change.

Therefore, option a, higher average temperatures, best explain the change in the glacier's size between 1910 and 1997.

Know more about Glacier:

https://brainly.com/question/28474050

#SPJ1

The error in the sentence is the spelling of the word "ne". It should be "no" instead. The corrected sentence would be: "Next morning, the town mouse found that there was no breakfast ready."