Answer:He could either let the destructive personnel keep destroying america, or he could drop the atomic bomb because the Japanese government was refusing to reconcile and surrender.
Answer:
He wasn’t sure if a demonstration bomb would work and couldn’t afford to have it be a dud.
He only had two, and it was believed that two were needed to end the war.
Explanation:
edge 2020-21
which of the following describes the mexican government's position toward mexican texas after mexico won its independence from spain in 1821? question 2 options: a) it encouraged american settlers to move into the area to provide a buffer against raids from the powerful comanche indians until 1829. b) it passed laws in 1829 that banned slavery and required new immigrants to covert to catholicism, then banned in-migration starting in 1830. c) it went to war against texas in 1836 to suppress the texas revolution. d) all of the above.
The Mexican government's position toward Mexican Texas after Mexico won its independence from Spain in 1821 is best described by option D) All of the above.
In order to protect the region from Comanche raids, American settlers were encouraged to settle there. Additionally, rules governing slavery and religion for incoming immigrants were passed in 1829, and a war was declared against Texas in 1836 to put an end to the Texas Revolution. Immigration was outlawed beginning in 1830 when the government implemented laws outlawing slavery and requiring new immigrants to convert to Catholicism in 1829. Texas Revolution, also known as the War of Texas Independence, was a conflict between Mexican colonists and Texas colonists that lasted from October 1835 to April 1836 and led to Texas's independence. Mexico. Relations between the Republic of Texas and Mexico are referred to as Republic of Texas-Mexico Relations. As a result of the signing of the in 1836, relations were unofficially independence.
To know more about Independence refer :
brainly.com/question/13286249
#SPJ11
In 1637 , colonist killed between 500 and 600 American Indians in Connecticut
Answer: In 1637 English colonists, aided by Mohegan and Narraganset warriors, attacked the main Pequot fort at Mystic, Connecticut. Between 500 and 600 Pequot were burned alive or slaughtered in what became known as the Pequot War. After the war some Pequot decided to separate into small bands and abandon the area.
Explanation:
Bedford of Delaware believed that if the large states continued to crush the smaller States the smaller States would seek aid from who?
Answer: Foreign nations
Explanation:
Gunning Bedford, Jr. was a delegate from Delaware to the Constitutional Convention that aimed to introduce a new constitution that would make the Federal government more powerful in order to increase its effectiveness.
Bradford gained a reputation during the Convention for being bold and commanding as he argued ceaselessly for the rights of smaller states in the Union whom he felt were being marginalised by the larger states.
He even went so far as to say that if this continued, the smaller states would be forced to make foreign alliances in order to protect themselves and their interests.
Which partisan theory explains why the Democratic Party identifiers moved from supporting segregation to spearheading civil rights
A citizen's non-public affinity for a political celebration, typically expressed through an inclination to vote for the applicants of that celebration.
As a end result of partisan polarization, compromise among politicians will become greater difficult. the New Deal and regulations regarding civil rights. Partisan (partisanship) an adherent or supporter of someone, group, celebration, or cause, specially someone who suggests a biased, emotional allegiance. Political Party prepared corporations that strive to steer the authorities through electing their contributors to crucial authorities offices. . Partisan sorting is whilst American citizens kind themselves into the Democratic or Republican events due to the fact they're efficaciously matching their celebration and problem options greater than before.
To learn more about civil rights check the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/8852160
#SPJ4
Which best states how the Renaissance affected Europe between 1300 and 1600? The Renaissance led to major artistic changes but few social changes in Europe. The Renaissance led to major social changes but few political changes in Europe. The Renaissance led to no major artistic, social, or political changes in Europe. The Renaissance led to major artistic, social, and political changes in Europe.
The correct answer is D) The Renaissance led to major artistic, social, and political changes in Europe.
The sentence that best states how the Renaissance affected Europe between 1300 and 1600 is "The Renaissance led to major artistic, social, and political changes in Europe."
This was completely true because the changes during this important era of transformation in Europe were artistic, political, and social. The Renaissance was a time in which authors, thinkers, and artists discover the importance of humans and their capacity to use the mind to reason and not only believe in the religious teachings that dominated and controlled people during the dark ages of the Medieval Times.
It also was a time of fantastic artistic expressions in places like Florence, Italy, and the advent of magnificent artists such as Leonardo Da Vinci. Michel Angelo, and Rafael.
Answer:
The Renaissance led to major artistic, social, and political changes in Europe.
Explanation:
i just took the test
According to the concept of laissez-faire, prices and wages are best determined by the
A. federal government.
B. free market.
C. gross national product.
D. individual states.
Answer: Free Market
Explanation: The concept of laissez faire insofar as governmental involvement can be better understood when applied to a business situation such as this one. A laissez faire economy is built on fundamental concepts, including: The individual is the basic unit in society. The individual has a natural right to freedom.
According to the concept of laissez-faire, prices and wages are best determined by the free market. Hence, option B is correct.
What is free market?Government intervention is absent in a free market, and supply and demand and voluntary exchange serve as the only pillars of the economic system. An essential component of free markets is the absence of compelled transactions or restrictions on transactions.
Economists define a free market as one where buyers and sellers transfer things voluntarily. Paying for goods at a certain price set by the agricultural farmer is a great example of an economic transaction.
When applied to a corporate scenario like this one, the idea of laissez-faire insofar as state intervention can be better understood. The essential tenets of a laissez-faire economy include: The individual is the primary element of society. A person's natural right to freedom exists.
Thus, option B is correct.
For more details about free market, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13172440
#SPJ2
Use the list to answer the question.
. Magna Carta
• Mayflower Compact
• English Bill of Rights
. Common Sense
How did these documents influence early American leaders' views of government in the United States?
O They strengthened their belief in parliamentary democracy, leading them to support British representatives in the colonies.
O They weakened their belief in self-government, leading them to support British representatives in the colonies.
O They strengthened their belief in self-government, leading them to declare independence from Great Britain.
O They weakened their belief in parliamentary democracy, leading them to declare independence from Great Britain.
The way the documents influenced early American leaders' views of government in the United States is C. They strengthened their belief in self-government, leading them to declare independence from Great Britain.
What was the result of the early governing documents of the British American colonies ?The documents mentioned - Magna Carta, Mayflower Compact, English Bill of Rights, and Common Sense - all strengthened early American leaders' belief in self-government, leading them to declare independence from Great Britain.
The Magna Carta, written in 1215, established the idea that everyone, including the king, was subject to the law. This idea was later incorporated into the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The Mayflower Compact, written in 1620, was a social contract among the Pilgrims who settled in Plymouth, Massachusetts. It established the idea that people could govern themselves through elected representatives.
Find out more on the Mayflower Compact at https://brainly.com/question/1680356
#SPJ1
how did imperialism affect people (positively and/or negatively)?
Elinor is looking for reputable sources to support the reasons for her essay's claim. So far, she has found a lot of personal blogs that address the topic. She wants to use them but knows that she should not, because
A. anyone can change the information in personal blogs.
B. personal blogs are generally unreliable sources.
C. personal blogs usually are trying to sell a product.
D. any information from a personal blog is incorrect.
Answer:the answer is B.
Explanation:
Personal blogs are generally unreliable sources.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A strong claim needs to
consider all positions of an argument.
be based on an emotional response.
respond directly to the writing prompt.
argue for and against something.
What events and conditions led to World War II?
Causes of World War IIThe Failure of Peace Efforts. ...The Rise of Fascism. ...Formation of the Axis Coalition. ...German Aggression in Europe. ...The Worldwide Great Depression. ...Mukden Incident and the Invasion of Manchuria (1931) ...Japan invades China (1937) ...Pearl Harbor and Simultaneous Invasions (early December 1941)
#pglubestiehere
When India became independent, what factor determined where people would live in the new states that were created?
Answer:
Religion
Explanation:
Hindus were settled in India, while Muslims went to Pakistan
All powers of the local government are given to them by the constitution of Virginia and acts passed by what legislative body?
All the powers of the local government are given to them by the constitution of Virginia and acts passed by a legislative body known as General Assembly.
Which body enacted the constitution of Virginia Acts?Since 1776, the people of Virginia have been defined as the source of authority for the state government. However, that foundation should not be used to conclude that "the people" are the source of authority in Virginia's 95 counties, 38 cities, and 191 towns.
Local governments in Virginia derive all of their decision-making authority from laws passed by the state legislature, the General Assembly. The authority cited for breaking away from King George III - and for establishing the Federal government, "We the People..." - is not the authority for establishing local government in Virginia.
Read more about local government
brainly.com/question/25192887
#SPJ1
COMPLETE
In addition to paying debts and promoting industry, Hamilton wanted to
-Establish a national bank
-promote farming
-reduce manufacturing
Answer:
1. Establish a National Bank
Explanation:
Answer:
Choose the right word or phrase to complete these sentences.
Hamilton wanted the federal government to promise to pay off
✔ both state and national debts
.
In addition to paying debts and promoting industry, Hamilton wanted to
✔ establish a national bank
.
Hamilton’s plan to increase US manufacturing was a
✔ failure
.
Explanation:
Most soldiers in the Civil War lived in these type of communities before they joined the civil war
Army
Answer:
ik
Explanation:
pole dancer community
Just like pirates cherished their earrings and Vikings dyed their hair, samurai demonstrated their
dedication to the code and to their lifestyle in some unique ways. Describe some of these. *
Samurai demonstrated their dedication to their code and lifestyle by following the bushido code, an unwritten norm about honour, loyalty, sacrifice, and bravery.
One way the Samurai observed this code was by testing the sharpness of their weapons on corpses and criminals. This was known as the practice of tameshigiri or cutting tests. Samurai wanted the sharpest weapons possible to successfully perform the Takeuchi - death by one single blow.
Another way these norms were manifested was by seppuku. It was done by a samurai and his wife if he violated the bushido code. It could also be used to avoid falling into enemy hands, demonstrate loyalty to a fallen lord, or as a method of execution.
For more information on Samurai, please refer to the question given below:
https://brainly.com/question/20369272
The letter's significance as a source of information on popular attitudes to Bolshevik revolutionary policies lies in the fact that it suggests that some Soviet citizens
To potentially hostile Bolshevik revolutionary policies , Yanaihara wanted to defend the continuation of Japanese colonial rule over Korea.
What is the author's main argument and what is the focus of the article?the most crucial argument a writer is attempting to make regarding the subject. This is also known as a main idea. These details, instances, arguments, and other details are provided to clarify and further develop the main concept.
What is one of the main motivations behind student writing publication?Your students will write and read better after learning about the publishing process. It demonstrates to them firsthand the importance of editing and enables them to interact more effectively with team members and the general public.
To know more about Bolshevik revolutionary policies visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/31181106
#SPJ1
in what ways have historical experiences of minority groups have been similar and how have they differed
Minority groups share a common fate throughout history as they have encountered various forms of prejudice, marginalization and systematic oppression.
What ways have historical experiences of minority groups have been similar and how have they differedMembers of certain minority backgrounds such as African Americans, Native Americans and those who identify themselves as LGBTQ+ have frequently experienced social imbalances, financial insecurity, unjust governance in accordance with their identities.
According to this pattern of shared experiences among minorities, all these oppressed communities have found it necessary to protest and demonstrate for their justice and equality. They aimed to raise awareness about the challenges of bigotry that persistently threaten their livelihoods by boycotting, engaging in civil disobedience or other forms of activism in order to bring about change.
Read more on minority groups here:https://brainly.com/question/14948712
#SPJ1
an ancient egypt workers were paid in products insted money
In ancient Egypt, workers were paid in products instead of money. This was a common practice in many ancient civilizations, where the barter system was prevalent and cashless transactions were the norm.
However, this system was not limited to just workers; in fact, most people, including farmers and merchants, traded their goods and services for other goods and services.In ancient Egypt, the most commonly traded items included grain, wine, oil, and linen. Workers were often paid in goods that were essential for their livelihoods, such as food and clothing. The products were given to workers as compensation for their labor and were usually distributed by the pharaoh or other high-ranking officials.The workers in ancient Egypt were divided into different groups based on their professions. The different groups included farmers, laborers, craftsmen, and others. Each group had its own set of products that were used for payment. For example, farmers were paid in crops, while craftsmen were paid in the products they produced.Ancient Egyptians also used a bartering system called "heqats," which were small pieces of copper that were used to measure the value of goods. This system was used to ensure that all transactions were fair and equal, and that everyone received their fair share of goods.For such more questions on Egypt
https://brainly.com/question/28420312
#SPJ8
hich of the following might be a negative externality of introducing a soft drink in a developing country? increased use of contaminated water increased health care costs lower sales of plastic and paper products increased local business comp
A negative externality of introducing a soft drink in a developing country could be an increased use of contaminated water.
Soft drinks require water for production and consumption, and in developing countries, the main water source may not be potable or up to industry standards. The soft drink industry would increase demand for water, and while some suppliers may be able to meet this demand, some may turn to contaminated or unclean sources, leading to health impacts such as gastrointestinal illnesses.
Increased use of contaminated water in the production of soft drinks could also lead to health care costs associated with illnesses caused by the contaminated water. In addition, increased demand for production and consumption of soft drinks could lead to a lowering in sales of plastic and paper products, as these materials are commonly used in packaging soft drinks.
Finally, the introduction of a major soft drink industry could have both pros and cons for the local businesses in terms of increased competition and the potential for new employment opportunities.
To know more about negative externality , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13901028
#SPJ4
How is Laertes described in Hamlet?.
Laertes is a fierce, compulsive individual who acts without wondering. He is likewise brave and geared up to kill all people who could have been part of his father's demise.
Laertes isn't brazenly emotional approximately the loss of life of his father however is eager to are looking for revenge.
The word that best describes Laertes is “passionate.” In act IV, he is informed of his father's dying and makes a decision to return to Denmark. He gathers a mob and, taking the fort, opposes Claudius.
Laertes /leɪˈɜːrtiːz/ is a person in William Shakespeare's c. 1600 play Hamlet. Laertes is the son of Polonius and the brother of Ophelia. inside the very last scene, he mortally stabs Hamlet with a poison-tipped sword to avenge the deaths of his father and sister, for which he blamed Hamlet.
Learn more about Laertes Hamlet here: brainly.com/question/806658
#SPJ4
The U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 led to:
A. The total defeat of Al-Qaeda
B. Many terrorists groups relocating to Pakistan
C. Major terrorist attacks in the United States
D. The Taliban taking control of the country
Answer:
the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 led to B, Many terrorist groups relocating to Pakistan
Explanation:
Dubbed “Operation Enduring Freedom” in U.S. military parlance, the invasion of Afghanistan was intended to target terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida organization, which was based in the country, as well as the extreme fundamentalist Taliban government that had ruled most of the country since 1996
It held control of most of the country until being overthrown after the American-led invasion of Afghanistan in December 2001 following the September 11 attacks.
...
Taliban.
Taliban طالبان (Pashto)
Headquarters Kandahar, Afghanistan (1996–2001)
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!! HAVE A GREAT DAY AND GOD BLESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
In your own words, tell me what you think a revolution is and do
you think revolutions are still necessary in the 21st century?
A revolution, in broad terms, refers to a radical and transformative change in society, often accompanied by significant shifts in political, social, economic, or cultural structures.
It typically involves widespread and collective actions taken by individuals or groups to challenge and overthrow existing power structures in pursuit of a new vision or ideology.Revolutions historically have been driven by various factors, such as oppressive regimes, inequality, social injustice, political repression, or economic hardships. They can emerge as a response to the grievances of marginalized groups, seeking to challenge and reshape the status quo.
As for the necessity of revolutions in the 21st century, it is a complex and subjective question. While many societies have made substantial progress in terms of democracy, human rights, and social justice, significant challenges and inequalities persist. Issues like wealth disparity, systemic discrimination, political corruption, environmental degradation, and the limitations of existing systems can still generate discontent and demands for change.
However, the nature of social and political activism has evolved in the 21st century. Movements and protests have increasingly embraced nonviolent means, advocating for reform, social movements, and incremental change rather than seeking to completely overthrow existing systems through violent revolutions.
Whether a revolution is deemed necessary or not depends on the specific context and the goals being pursued. Some argue that incremental reforms and peaceful means of change can address societal issues effectively, while others believe that fundamental structural changes may require more disruptive and transformative approaches.
Ultimately, the question of whether revolutions are still necessary in the 21st century is a matter of ongoing debate and depends on one's perspective on the existing systems, the specific issues at hand, and the effectiveness of various means of social and political change.
To know more about transformative visit
https://brainly.com/question/33487023
#SPJ11
A revolution can be described as a profound and often violent change in the social, political, or economic structures of a society. It typically involves a collective uprising by a significant portion of the population against an existing system or regime, driven by a shared desire for fundamental transformation. Revolutions aim to challenge and overthrow oppressive or unjust power structures and establish new ones that reflect the aspirations and needs of the people.
In the 21st century, while many societies have made significant progress in terms of social and political advancements, there are still instances where revolutions can be seen as necessary. Factors that might contribute to the need for revolutions include systemic inequality, political corruption, authoritarianism, lack of basic human rights, and social injustices. In such cases, revolutions can serve as a catalyst for change, giving a voice to marginalized groups and creating opportunities for building more inclusive, equitable, and democratic societies.
It's important to note that not all revolutions are violent or result in widespread destruction. Peaceful revolutions, driven by mass protests, civil disobedience, and collective action, can also bring about transformative changes. In the 21st century, advancements in technology and communication have provided new avenues for mobilization and organizing, making peaceful revolutions more viable than ever before.
However, it is crucial to evaluate each situation individually and consider the potential consequences of revolution. While revolutions have the potential to bring about positive change, they can also be accompanied by significant instability, violence, and loss of life. Therefore, it is essential to seek peaceful means of addressing grievances and pursuing social progress whenever possible.
To know more about revolution Visit
https://brainly.com/question/21398749
#SPJ11
While they lived in England, King James I told the Puritans that they had to attend the Church of England or face legal punishment.
True
False
Answer:
Correct answer: True
Explanation:
Puritan is commonly applied to a reform movement that aim to purify the practices and structure of the Church of England. They believe that civil authorities should enforce religion. King James 1 had series of issues with the Puritans regarding to religion and its affilated problems.
Due to this issue, most Puritians left England and moved to America inorder to escape the religious persecution they are facing in the hand of King James 1.
Which sentences need to be revised to make the tone and word choice appropriate for an argumentative essay? Check all that apply.
Answer:
ALL OF THE ABOVE
Explanation:
NN
Acts are Judged by____
(islamic)
Answer:
intentions
Explanation:
Answer:
Acts are judged by intentions
use your graphic organizer to compare how german and japanese aggression affected the united states.
Both German and Japanese aggression had significant impacts on the United States. They drew the U.S. into World War II, led to economic sanctions, necessitated military mobilization, and resulted in the internment of Japanese Americans.
German Aggression | Japanese Aggression
Military Actions | 1. Attack on Pearl Harbor
Germany engaged in military actions primarily in Europe, leading to the outbreak of World War II. The U.S. became involved in the war after the German invasion of Poland in 1939.
Japan's aggression was primarily focused on the Asia-Pacific region. The surprise attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 brought the United States into World War II.
Economic Impact | 2. Economic Sanctions
German aggression threatened U.S. economic interests as it aimed to control resources and markets in Europe. The U.S. implemented economic sanctions and trade restrictions against Germany.
Japanese aggression in the Pacific threatened U.S. economic influence and access to resources. The U.S. responded with economic sanctions, including an oil embargo, against Japan.
Mobilization and War Effort | 3. Internment of Japanese Americans
German aggression prompted the United States to mobilize its military and industrial capabilities to support Allied forces in Europe. This led to increased production and the draft.
Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, the U.S. government implemented measures targeting Japanese Americans, including internment camps, based on fear and prejudice.
End of War and Aftermath | 4. Occupation and Rebuilding
Germany's surrender in 1945 marked the end of World War II in Europe. The United States played a significant role in the occupation, rebuilding, and democratization of post-war Germany.
The United States, along with Allied powers, occupied Japan after its surrender in 1945. The U.S. contributed to Japan's reconstruction and transformation into a democratic nation.
To learn more about World War
https://brainly.com/question/13382356
#SPJ4
True or False: According to the video, Franciscan Priests are the same thing as a "friar".
O True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Answer:
True is the answer
Explanation:
describe how this information connects to what we have been learning about white supremacy, Christian nationalism, and the attempted overthrow of the 2020 election by pro-Trump rioters on January 6th, 2021.
Answer: they didn't like how trump was running the contrey
Explanation: did the quiz and got it right
Write down a few lines of conversation exactly as you hear them spoken. Please review section 3 of the lesson "Mastering Dialogue." Punctuate and capitalize your quotations appropriately, and remember to start a new paragraph when a different person speaks.
Help, 20 points, mark as Brainly.
The conversation exactly as I have heard them spoken are enumerated below.
Conversation spoken verbatim"I can't believe we're finally here," Sarahexclaimed with excitement.
"I know, it's been a long journey," replied John,glancing around in awe.
"Look at that view! It's absolutely breathtaking," Sarah gasped.
"I'm glad we made the trip. This place is truly special,"John said, taking it all in.
"We should take some photos to capture this moment," Sarah suggested, reaching for her camera.
It is to be noted that the conversation provided adheres to the guidelines of proper punctuation and capitalization for dialogue.
Learn more about conversation at:
https://brainly.com/question/24549573
#SPJ1
PLS HELP
Abraham Lincoln is considered one of our greatest presidents. Explain what Lincoln did as president to earn this reputation.
• Include in your answer:
• Lincoln’s goals for the country
• Lincoln’s leadership during the Civil War
• Lincoln’s view of slavery and his emerging view of the government’s role in settling the slavery issue
• Lincoln’s vision for the future of the country
Abraham Lincoln's reputation as a great president stems from his goals to preserve the Union, his strong leadership during the Civil War, his evolving view on slavery, and his vision of a reunited and free nation.
Abraham Lincoln's reputation as one of the greatest presidents in U.S. history stems from his significant contributions and actions during his presidency. Lincoln's overarching goal was to preserve the Union and ensure the survival of the United States as a single, indivisible nation. He believed that the principles of liberty and equality enshrined in the Declaration of Independence were the foundation of the nation and sought to protect them.
During the Civil War, Lincoln exhibited strong leadership by effectively navigating the challenges posed by the conflict. He made crucial decisions such as the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862, which declared that all slaves in Confederate-held territory were to be set free. This move not only redefined the goals of the war but also led to the eventual abolition of slavery.
Lincoln's view of slavery evolved over time. While initially, he aimed to prevent the spread of slavery to new territories, he recognized the moral and social injustice of the institution. Lincoln believed that the government had a duty to address the issue, leading him to advocate for the eventual emancipation of all enslaved people.
In terms of the future of the country, Lincoln envisioned a reunited nation where all citizens could enjoy freedom and equality. His iconic Gettysburg Address in 1863 emphasized the importance of preserving the Union and honoring the sacrifice of those who fought for it. He advocated for post-war reconciliation and the rebuilding of the nation, expressing a desire for a united and prosperous United States.
Abraham Lincoln's leadership during the Civil War, his evolving view on slavery, his commitment to preserving the Union, and his vision for a united and free nation all contributed to his reputation as one of the greatest presidents in American history.
Know more about Civil War here:
https://brainly.com/question/24992590
#SPJ8