please answer the boxes that are empty!
please get the answers from the text i gave out!
will: mark brainliest, a THX, a friend request, and will rate ur answer

THX

Answer:

.

Explanation:

Some new ideas that can be implemented is hiding the people in the dark to blend in with the dark

No in order to have a democracy u need federalism

For those of us interested in the spread and consolidation of democracy, whether as policy makers, human rights activists, political analysts, or democratic theorists, there is a greater need than ever to reconsider the potential risks and benefits of federalism. The greatest risk is that federal arrangements can offer opportunities for ethnic nationalists to mobilize their resources. This risk is especially grave when elections are introduced in the subunits of a formerly nondemocratic federal polity prior to democratic countrywide elections and in the absence of democratic countrywide parties. Of the nine states that once made up communist Europe, six were unitary and three were federal. The six unitary states are now five states (East Germany has reunited with the Federal Republic), while the three federal states—Yugoslavia, the USSR, and Czechoslovakia—are now 22 independent states. Most of postcommunist Europe’s ethnocracies and ethnic bloodshed have occurred within these postfederal states.
Yet in spite of these potential problems, federal rather than unitary states are the form most often associated with multinational democracies. Federal states are also associated with large populations, extensive territories, and democracies with territorially based linguistic fragmentation. In fact, every single longstanding democracy in a territorially based multilingual and multinational polity is a federal state. [End Page 19]
Although there are many multinational polities in the world, few of them are democracies. Those multinational democracies that do exist, however (Switzerland, Canada, Belgium, Spain, and India), are all federal. Although all these democracies, except for Switzerland, have had problems managing their multinational polities (and even Switzerland had the Sonderbund War, the secession of the Catholic cantons in 1848), they remain reasonably stable. By contrast, Sri Lanka, a territorially based multilingual and multinational unitary state that feared the “slippery slope” of federalism, could not cope with its ethnic divisions and plunged headlong into a bloody civil war that has lasted more than 15 years.
In addition to the strong association between multinational democracies and federalism, the six longstanding democracies that score highest on an index of linguistic and ethnic diversity—India, Canada, Belgium, Switzerland, Spain, and the United States—are all federal states. The fact that these nations chose to adopt a federal system does not prove anything; it does, however, suggest that federalism may help these countries manage the problems that come with ethnic and linguistic diversity. In fact, in my judgment, if countries such as Indonesia, Russia, Nigeria, China, and Burma are ever to become stable democracies, they will have to craft workable federal systems that allow cultural diversity, a robust capacity for socioeconomic development, and a general standard of equality among their citizens.
Consider the case of Indonesia, for example. It seems to meet all the indicators for a federal state. It has a population of over 200 million, and its territory is spread across more than 2,000 inhabited islands. It has great linguistic and ethnic fragmentation and many religions. Thus it is near the top in virtually all the categories associated with federalism. If Indonesia is to become a democracy, one would think that it would have to address the question of federalism or decentralization. Yet at a meeting of Indonesian political, military, religious, and intellectual leaders that I attended after the fall of Suharto, most of the participants (especially those from the military) rejected federalism out of hand because of secessionist conflicts at the end of Dutch colonial rule. Indonesia should at least consider what I call a federacy to deal with special jurisdictions like Aceh or Irian Jaya. A federacy is the only variation between unitary states and federal states. It is a political system in which an otherwise unitary state develops a federal relationship with a territorially, ethnically, or culturally distinct community while all the other parts of the state remain under unitary rule. Denmark has such a relationship with Greenland, and Finland with the Aaland Islands.
A Misleading Picture of Federalism
In seeking to understand why some countries are reluctant to adopt federal systems, it is helpful to examine what political science has had [End Page 20] to say about federalism. Unfortunately, some of the most influential works in political...

Answer:

In the War of 1812, the United States took on the greatest naval power in the world, Great Britain, in a conflict that would have an immense impact on the young country’s future

Explanation:

hope i helped

Answer:

cool nice awsome good for u

the answer is A nice pfp btw lol

The Progressives' efforts led to significant changes in American society. Their reforms resulted in improved working conditions, increased political accountability, expanded access to education, and the creation of social welfare programs.

The Progressives of the late 19th and early 20th centuries aimed to address a wide range of social, economic, and political issues.

They focused on several key areas for societal reform. One area targeted was labor conditions.

Progressives advocated for improved workplace safety, the establishment of minimum wage laws, and the regulation of working hours.

Their efforts led to the creation of labor unions and the passage of important legislation, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Another area of concern was political corruption.

Progressives pushed for political reforms, including the direct election of senators, the introduction of primary elections, and the adoption of anti-corruption measures. These changes aimed to increase government transparency and accountability.

Education was also a major focus for Progressives. They promoted the idea of universal education and worked to improve school facilities, teacher training, and curriculum standards.

These efforts resulted in the expansion of public education and the establishment of kindergarten programs. Lastly, Progressives sought to address social inequality and poverty.

They supported the establishment of social welfare programs, such as the creation of public housing and the introduction of welfare benefits. These initiatives aimed to alleviate poverty and provide a safety net for vulnerable members of society.

Overall, the Progressives' efforts led to significant changes in American society. Their reforms resulted in improved working conditions, increased political accountability, expanded access to education, and the creation of social welfare programs.

For more questions on American society.

https://brainly.com/question/13323062

#SPJ8

Boston Massacre: an event that occurred on Monday, 5th of March, 1770 in Boston, which helped spark the American Revolution.

Boston Tea Party: it was a political protest that happened in Boston in 1773 and it was led by the Sons of Liberty against the British parliament.

French And Indian War: these were series of battles between France and England in the new world, which resulted in the loss of all French possessions such as lands.

Sons of Liberty: it comprises a group of Patriots that was formed in 1765 to urge colonial resistance to the Stamp Act through the use of any means available such as violence.

Tax without Representation: this was a common complaint made by American Colonists because they felt they were being taxed from England without having any vote in the British Parliament.

Stamp Act: this was an Act passed by the British in 1765, requiring all legal documents to carry a tax mark in order to generate revenue to be used in paying the military for their presence in the American colonies

What was the war about?

Between April 19, 1775, and September 3, 1783, the United States of America fought in the American Revolutionary War, which was an independence conflict.

In essence, the American Revolutionary War began when the thirteen (13) American colonial representatives in Congress (First Continental Congress) rose up in rebellion against Great Britain over their lack of representation in the colonies and refusal to agree to the king's taxation, such as the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts.

Learn more about American Revolutionary War on:

https://brainly.com/question/11476567

#SPJ1

Mercantilism is the economic theory that states that a country's wealth can be raised by the regulation of commerce, namely through the promotion of exports and the restriction of imports. Mercantilism, when applied to the European colonization of North America, describes the belief that colonies were established solely to enrich the mother country.

As such, the British viewed the American colonists as renters who "paid rent" in the form of resources. It was widely believed that global wealth was static at the time. There were two ways for a nation's leaders to grow their country's wealth: exploration and expansion, or the conquest of other countries.

By establishing colonies in the Americas, Britain was able to considerably expand its economic foundation. Britain sought to maintain a surplus of exports over imports in order to retain its earnings. According to the mercantilist view, Britain should prioritize hoarding its wealth and avoiding international trade in order to meet its material needs. Many of these goods were supplied to the British by the colonists.

But at the time of the American colonies' drive for independence, and especially as they sought stable and egalitarian economic foundations for the emerging American state, mercantilism was not the sole understanding of how nations generated wealth.

Learn more about mercantilism

https://brainly.com/question/25281918

The statement that explains why the Common Era begins with the birth of Jesus of Nazareth over 2,000 years ago is: the period of time now described as the Common Era is based on older Christian periodization that divided time into a period before Jesus's birth and a period afterward.

What is the Common Era all about?

The uear notations for the Gregorian calendar (and its predecessor, the Julian calendar), the world's most widely used calendar era, are Common Era (CE) and Before the Common Era (BCE). Common Era and Before the Common Era are alternative notations for the same calendar era as Anno Domini (AD) and Before Christ (BC).

The Christian monk Dionysius Exiguus devised the concept of counting years beginning with the date then believed to be Jesus' birth date around the year 525.

Read more about Common Era

brainly.com/question/898349

#SPJ1

The Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) provided financial support to a variety of areas from 1932-1957.

What was the Reconstruction Finance Corporation?

The Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC) was a U.S. government agency established during the Great Depression in 1932 to provide financial assistance to struggling banks, railroads, and other businesses. The RFC was created as part of President Herbert Hoover's effort to address the economic crisis and stabilize the banking system. The RFC was authorized to lend up to $2 billion to businesses in need of financing, with the goal of promoting economic growth and creating jobs. The agency was empowered to make loans, purchase bonds and securities, and provide guarantees for loans made by private lenders. In addition to providing financial assistance to banks and businesses, the RFC also played a role in financing public works projects, such as the construction of dams and other infrastructure. The RFC continued to operate throughout the Great Depression and World War II, and was eventually abolished in 1957. While some critics argued that the RFC was an unnecessary government intervention in the economy, others credit the agency with helping to prevent the collapse of the banking system and supporting economic recovery during a time of crisis.

To learn more about Reconstruction Finance Corporation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/8878711

#SPJ1

Answer:banks

Railroads

Mortgage associations

Explanation:

The given statement "Each archetype in the heroic monomyth is exemplified by different entities representing the culture the myth originated from: one role, represented in many different ways," is true because  the hero's journey is a universal narrative pattern that is expressed differently across different cultures.

The heroic monomyth, also known as the hero's journey, is a common narrative pattern found in myths, legends, and stories from cultures around the world. This pattern typically involves a hero who embarks on a journey, faces various challenges and obstacles, and ultimately achieves a goal or triumphs over evil.

The archetypes, or universal character types, that appear in the hero's journey are often represented in different ways across different cultures. For example, the mentor archetype may be represented by a wise old wizard in one culture and a spiritual guide in another.

Additionally, different cultures may have their own unique archetypes that are not present in other cultures' hero's journeys. For instance, in Japanese folklore, there is the archetype of the oni, a demon-like creature that represents the villain or antagonist.

In summary, The archetypes that appear in the hero's journey are often represented in unique and culturally-specific ways.

For more question on archetype visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17910653

#SPJ11

The following Answer is False

A power that the Senate possesses that the House of Representatives does NOT is the power under the Constitution, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach government officials who are effectively public prosecutors. The Senate has the sole power to conduct impeachment trials and essentially acts as a jury and judge.

The Senate has the sole power to confirm presidential appointments requiring approval and to advise on and approve the ratification of treaties. However, he has two exceptions to this rule. The House must also approve the appointment of the Vice President and treaties affecting foreign trade.

The House has the power to impeach (formal) impeachment while the Senate does. In addition, the Senate approves treaties and certain presidential appointments, such as ambassadors and Supreme Court justices.

Learn more about Senate at

https://brainly.com/question/747425

#SPJ9

Colonies exported Tobacco to Great Britain

Answer: Tobacco

Explanation: The colonial economy depended on international trade. American ships carried products such as lumber, TOACCO , rice, and dried fish to Britain. In turn, the mother country sent textiles, and manufactured goods back to America.

The correct option is b) purchases, decrease.

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) purchases government securities in a bid to decrease the stock of money in the economy. This process is known as open market operations, where the RBI buys government securities from commercial banks and other financial institutions.

By purchasing these securities, the RBI reduces the amount of money available in the economy, effectively decreasing the stock of money. This is done to control inflation, manage liquidity in the banking system, and influence interest rates.

Learn more about RBI, here;

https://brainly.com/question/17160313

#SPJ1

The answer is F but it would be easier to answer if there was a pic

In  triumphs and troubles by Paul Mason, many sores appeared on people's faces and bodies as a result of the infections.

What is the explanation for this?

Some people were unable to walk or move because they were powerless, and they wailed in anguish.

Many people died not just from infections, but also from starvation since they "couldn't get out to look for food" and "everyone else was too sick to care for them, so they starved to death in their own beds."

Hence the cause was the infection the effect was pain an suffering.

Learn more about cause and effect ;
https://brainly.com/question/16556938
#SPJ1

The factors that led to the American Revolution and the establishment of American democracy. They help us understand the origins and development of American identity, as well as the principles and values that continue to shape American society today.

What is the importance of American history?

People of any age, including children, can benefit from learning about American history. Your child will develop a sense of patriotism and pride in his country if he is exposed to American history at a young age. It will teach him to respect his forefathers' sacrifices and struggles.

The three topics mentioned in Chapter 5 of a typical textbook on War and Empire, 1754-1774, are important to American history for the following reasons:

The French and Indian War (1754-1763) was a pivotal event in American history as it led to significant territorial changes and tensions between the British and the colonists, which eventually culminated in the American Revolution. British policies and colonial reactions highlight the tensions between the colonists and the British government and how they contributed to the growing sense of unity and identity among the colonists. The emergence of colonial unity demonstrates how the colonists were able to put aside their differences and work together to resist British policies that threatened their autonomy and rights.

Learn more about American history here:

https://brainly.com/question/21425542

#SPJ1

The true statements are Hitler ruled as a dictator and persuaded people to believe in a "pure” German race, and Nazism and fascism have some similarities.

Economic, but not social, activities are restricted under a fascist government: This statement is not true. Fascist governments typically exert control over both economic and social aspects of society, aiming to centralize power and suppress individual freedoms in both spheres.

Hitler ruled as a dictator and persuaded people to believe in a "pure” German race: This statement is true. Adolf Hitler was the dictator of Nazi Germany and propagated the idea of an Aryan "master race" as part of his ideological beliefs.

Hitler appealed to Europeans who believed in the unification of the continent: This statement is not specifically mentioned in the provided information. While Hitler aimed for German expansion and dominance in Europe, his appeal was primarily focused on promoting the interests and supremacy of Germany rather than unification across the continent as a whole.

Nazism and fascism have some similarities: This statement is true. Nazism is a specific form of fascism associated with Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany. Both Nazism and fascism share common characteristics, such as authoritarian rule, a focus on nationalism, suppression of dissent, and the use of propaganda.

In a fascist government, worker strikes are never allowed: This statement is not true. While fascist governments tend to suppress worker strikes and labor movements, it is not accurate to say that worker strikes are never allowed. The extent to which labor movements are suppressed may vary depending on the specific regime and its policies.

know more about Fascist governments here:

https://brainly.com/question/12922809

#SPJ8

Answer:

The better toil shall not be lost, The rebel thought unbowed.The sister of misfortune

Explanation:

Answer: example "The smallest atom of truth represents someone's bitter toil and agony

Explanation:

To write an essay about a character who has changed the law, we must take into account the following steps:

1. Choose a character.2. Present part of his life.3. Present what was his contribution to the laws.4. Conclude with a reflection.

Essays are argumentative texts that seek to persuade readers of a position or opinion on a specific topic through a series of true and verifiable arguments.

To write an essay we must take into account its structure:

IntroductionHypothesisDevelopingConclusion

According to the above, we could give an example taking Martin Luther King as one of the characters who changed the laws. So, in the first part, we must give a brief explanation of who was MLK the biography of him, and his importance for the laws.

In the hypothesis we expose our position, that is, in it, we could establish why we consider Martin Luther King as a person who changed the laws.

In the development, we present arguments and quotes from other sources to support our hypothesis. The sources and citations must be used appropriately so that we are not blamed for plagiarism by exposing the ideas of experts on the subject.

In the conclusion, we include a summary of our essay and the final ideas that the essay left us. For example, we can say in which specific field of law Martin Luther King influenced.

Learn more about essay in: https://brainly.com/question/1556386

Answer:

To adopt the culture of Western  European countries - Westernize

To westernize simply means to change the culture of a country in order to make it seem more like the culture of Western European countries.

Belief that God created the monarchy to  act as his representative - Divine right

The idea of the Divine right gave great power to monarchs, because they were seen almost as demi-gods.

A large fleet of warships - Armada

An armada is simply a large navy fleet.

High-ranking Russian nobility and  landowner - Boyar

A Boyar was a high feudal lord who owned large sections of land. Boyars were also part of the nobility in Wallachia, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Moldavia.

Answer:

divine right- belief that god created the monarchy to act as his representative.

armada- a large fleet of warships.

westernize- to adopt the culture of Western European countries.

boyar- high-ranking Russian nobility and landowner.

ideal-existing as a perfect example.

Explanation:

correct on edge 2020

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

C. They challenged the law in court

Explanation:

Answer:

Israel it was established on may 19 1948 on middle east

The most appropriate  answer is "Equilibrium Point". However, based on the options given, it is "The product's equilibrium price" (Option A).

What is equilibrium price?

The equilibrium price   is the price at which the quantity demanded by consumers equals the quantity supplied byproducers in a market.

It is important because it   represents a point of balance wheresupply and demand are in harmony.

It ensures that resources are   allocated efficiently, prevents shortages or surpluses,and allows markets to function smoothly.

The equilibrium price also serves as a reference point for businesses and consumers in making economic decisions.

Learn more about Equilibrium Point at:

https://brainly.com/question/26075805

#SPJ1

Despite being two different concepts, secularism and individualism have a lot in common. They are both related to keeping church and life apart.

Government and the individual are separated by secularism, which encourages individuals to focus more on what is relevant to their daily lives than what the Bible says.

What is Christianity?

According to Jesus of Nazareth's life and teachings, Christianity is an Abrahamic monotheistic religion. With almost 2.38 billion adherents, or one-third of the world's population, it is the biggest and most pervasive religion.

The majority of its followers, known as Christians, are thought to live in 157 nations and territories and hold to the belief that Jesus is the Son of God, whose advent as the messiah was foretold in the Hebrew Bible (known in Christianity as the Old Testament) and recorded in the New Testament.

Learn more about Christianity, from:

brainly.com/question/3749222

#SPJ1

The correct answer is: Americans fulfilled pent-up desires to buy manufactured goods after World War II.

The factors that contributed to the increase in wages during the time period of 1940 to 1960, as shown in the chart, were:

Americans fulfilled pent-up desires to buy manufactured goods after World War II.

After World War II, there was a surge in consumer demand for manufactured goods as the economy shifted from wartime production to peacetime production. The war had created a backlog of consumer desires and postponed purchases, leading to increased demand for goods and services. This increased demand, coupled with the growth of industries and the expansion of manufacturing, created more job opportunities and drove up wages for manufacturing workers.

Factors such as corporations sharing profits with union workers (A) and industries continuing to manufacture war materials due to the Korean War (B) could have played a role in wage increases to some extent, but they are not directly reflected in the chart. Additionally, the notion of women leaving the workforce to run households (C) could have had some influence on the labor market dynamics, but it is not a major factor evident in the provided information.

The right answer is D. Americans fulfilled pent-up desires to buy manufactured goods after World War II.

For more such question on World War II

https://brainly.com/question/651584

#SPJ11

America got independence on July 4th 1776. The American revolutionary war I think.

Answer:

Without knowing the specific context and dates referred to in the question, it is difficult to provide a definitive answer. However, assuming that the question is referring to a specific event during the American Civil War, it is possible to speculate on some reasons why Jefferson Davis might have chosen not to send reinforcements to a besieged town.

During the Civil War, the Confederacy faced significant challenges in terms of resources and manpower. The Confederacy was often stretched thin, particularly in the later years of the war, and was forced to make difficult choices about where to allocate its limited resources. As a result, Davis may have decided not to send reinforcements to a besieged town because he believed that the Confederacy simply did not have the resources to spare.

Another factor that may have influenced Davis's decision was the political and military situation at the time. Depending on the specific event in question, Davis may have been facing pressure from other Confederate leaders or from the public to focus on other priorities, such as defending the capital or winning a major battle. Additionally, Davis may have been concerned about the potential consequences of sending reinforcements, such as leaving other areas vulnerable to attack or further depleting the Confederacy's already-limited resources.

Overall, the decision not to send reinforcements to a besieged town during the Civil War likely involved a complex set of factors, including resource constraints, political pressure, and military considerations.

During the American Civil War, Jefferson Davis chose not to send reinforcements to Vicksburg during the siege because the Confederate army was also facing critical battles in other regions, such as Gettysburg in the east. Davis likely prioritized allocating resources to multiple fronts simultaneously, making it difficult to provide immediate assistance to Vicksburg.

Jefferson Davis made the decision not to send reinforcements to the besieged town of Vicksburg for several reasons. Firstly, the timing of the siege coincided with other crucial battles in the American Civil War, such as the Battle of Gettysburg. Davis had to allocate resources and troops to multiple fronts simultaneously, making it challenging to provide immediate aid to Vicksburg. Secondly, the geographical obstacles presented a significant challenge. Vicksburg was located on high bluffs along the Mississippi River, making it difficult to supply and reinforce the town. Additionally, Union forces had effectively cut off the city's access to the river, further limiting the Confederacy's ability to support Vicksburg.

Given these circumstances, Davis likely calculated that diverting resources from other critical fronts would be unwise and opted to concentrate efforts elsewhere.

Note: The complete question is:

Jefferson Davis called Vicksburg the "Nail that holds the Confederacy together" because it linked western Confederate states (LA, TX, AR) to eastern Confederate states. Despite this opinion, Jefferson Davis decided not to send reinforcements to help the besieged town. Why do you think he made that choice? (Hint: Look at the dates and think of the time period)

For more questions on American Civil War:

https://brainly.com/question/1020924

#SPJ8